Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-18-2012, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Houston
940 posts, read 1,901,746 times
Reputation: 1490

Advertisements

My home in Houston got burglarized back in August, my loss at about $12,000 including some heirloom jewelry. About a month ago a couple of items, woodwind musical instruments worth $2500 total, turned up in pawn shops. I assumed that whoever turned the items into fast cash would become a suspect for either the burglary or at least receipt of stolen property. But no he gets a pass, you know why? Because some 3-4 weeks went by between the burglary and the sale to the pawn shop. Seems like this is the logic behind secret #1: since a burglar would probably want cash even faster, this guy can't be the burglar. OK fine, unless the burglar knows secret #1: that if he waits a month before the sale, he will not be a suspect in the burglary.

Well then there is at least the fallback on the receipt of stolen property statute right? A way to arrest the guy and at least get some questions in his face right? Wrong. They (Harris County DA) are just not going to go to the trouble. No arrest warrant for this felony. Which is secret #2. The secret is or maybe we should just say the joke is (since this really can't be all that secret) the uselessness of the statutes.

I think instead of the DA's office having these guys figured out, it is quite possibly the other way around.

Last edited by groovamos; 10-18-2012 at 06:25 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-17-2012, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Houston
940 posts, read 1,901,746 times
Reputation: 1490
I had heard from the investigator the number of days that went by and wrote "weeks", and it was actually 4 days after the theft when the items were pawned. The woman at the head of the DA's office has instituted a policy that if items are pawned more than 2 days after the report of the theft of such, the person will be deemed innocent of any felony. My investigator tells me Harris County is the only jurisdiction anywhere, that HPD knows of, where a rule like this is followed. Watch for Lisa Falkenberg to cover this if I can convince her.

The woman at the top: Office of District Attorney, Harris County, Texas, Patricia R. Lykos
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top