Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-21-2012, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,104 posts, read 34,720,210 times
Reputation: 15093

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
Actually the SEALs could have brought a bunch of modern stuff like cigarette lighters, binoculars, compasses, ball point pens etc, which would have been viewed as incredible treasures by the Romans and sold to them at huge prices. Then with their instant and immense wealth, the SEALs could do what the Romans typically did themselves, buy the loyalty of whatever legions were around and turn them against opposing legions.
They could. But then that would not be very fun, would it?

My guess is that 50-60 SEALS could take out a legion within 5 to 10 minutes. And that's just with high-powered rifles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-21-2012, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
Why would they have to go looking for Roman soldiers? They could fight their way to Rome and blow a whole right through its walls with C-4.

We're to assume that they're transporting all of their own equipment.
In order to determine whether such a military success could occur, you first need to define the tactical objective. Is it to "take out the entire Roman army" (as the OP stated), or is it to penetrate the wall of the Forum? Which would not be a target of value, because Caesar is hiding in a spider hole somewhere in Gaul.

The Seals can't "take out the entire Roman army" without somehow engaging the entire Roman army. Including those defending the Roman realm in Wales, Morocco, Azerbaijan, and Arabia.

Last edited by jtur88; 11-21-2012 at 02:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,104 posts, read 34,720,210 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
No, the key question is why would they WANT to go looking for Roman soldiers. In order to determine whether such a military success could occur, you first need to define the tactical objective. Is it just to "take out the entire Roman army" (as the OP stated), or is it to penetrate the wall of the Forum? Which would not be a target of value, because Caesar is hiding in a spider hole somewhere in Gaul.
So if the SEALS started pushing towards Rome, Caesar would not deploy as much of his army as he could to thwart an invasion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
So if the SEALS started pushing towards Rome, Caesar would not deploy as much of his army as he could to thwart an invasion?
It took weeks for Caesar to effect troop movements, or to even learn about attacks on the frontiers. He did not have the Internet.

The Seals advance would be slow. They would cross the border in Hummers, but when they ran out of gas, they would have to abandon their vehicles and move forward on foot, limited to whatever arms they could carry on their backs.

For a comparison, try to picture the Australian Aborigines staging a revolt, and Canberra decides to send 60 white Aussie special forces into the outback to quell the uprising all by themselves, with no logistical support. None would come back alive.

Last edited by jtur88; 11-21-2012 at 02:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Hudson County, NJ
1,489 posts, read 3,088,853 times
Reputation: 1193
Obviously should be tanks and helicopters aside, as that really isn't so much what seals are about.

I think another question is geography, and situation.

Is this two groups clashing in the desert, jungle. Is one on defensive, is one charging. What is the setup time.

I would think the ROmans would come out charging with their number rather than sit back, especially if you mentioned 50k Roman soldiers. That is a lot of weaponry needed to unleash and to haul around for the Seals. I kind of doubt it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,104 posts, read 34,720,210 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by nowitsshowtime View Post
Is this two groups clashing in the desert, jungle. Is one on defensive, is one charging.
Romans charging. SEALS on defense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nowitsshowtime View Post
I would think the ROmans would come out charging with their number rather than sit back, especially if you mentioned 50k Roman soldiers. That is a lot of weaponry needed to unleash and to haul around for the Seals. I kind of doubt it.
But wouldn't smoke screens and grenade launchers? They could even fire napalm and burn up whole legions within minutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 02:50 PM
 
2,479 posts, read 2,213,645 times
Reputation: 2277
Default Stand Off Weapons

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
I doubt if 60 men, during the course of their entire lifetime, could cover enough geography to engage every defending soldier over the entire empire. Unless they could all be enticed to stand together in a single field. Otherwise, all the Romans would need to do is hide when the Seals approached. Unless the Seals were intent upon inflicting heavy collateral damage, there would be no point in the Romans even getting into harms way, with nothing to defend the empire against. Just let the Seals drive around aimlessly in their Hummers and sit around in the cabarets and tuck American dollars into the bras of the artistes.

Is there an assumption that the Seals have the logistical support of the entire US military and all the allies we can bribe, or do they have to transport all their own equipment and forage for themselves as they search nooks and crannies for Roman soldiers?

My grand mother can beat your grand mother. Stupid thread.

Modern warfare is stand off weapons. So one man today with sufficient stand off weapons can destroy anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,104 posts, read 34,720,210 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistermobile View Post
Modern warfare is stand off weapons. So one man today with sufficient stand off weapons can destroy anything.
That's not necessarily true. What do you do when your stand off weapon jams?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
I doubt if 60 men could ever take a fairly large and populous country. They might be able to inflict considerable damage at the outset among regular troops and even storm the palace, but would be faced with guerrilla warfare virtually forever. The Russians couldn't take Afghanistan, the Americans couldn't take Vietnam, even with a half a million boots on the ground for more than a decade armed with weaponry fairly close to today's state of the art and with virtually unlimited logistic support..

Having said that, I'll bet 60 Navy Seals in white vans rented at Kuwait airport, pulling a couple of Uhaul trailers full of $100 bills, could have won the hearts and minds of Baghdad in 24 hours without firing a shot.

Last edited by jtur88; 11-21-2012 at 03:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,104 posts, read 34,720,210 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
I doubt if 60 men could ever take a fairly large and populous country. They might be able to inflict considerable damage at the outset among regular troops and even storm the palace, but would be faced with guerrilla warfare virtually forever. The Russians couldn't take Afghanistan, the Americans couldn't take Vietnam, even with a half a million boots on the ground for more than a decade armed with weaponry fairly close to today's state of the art and with virtually unlimited logistic support.
They wouldn't have to invade and occupy the whole entire Roman Empire. They would just need to decimate its military. I'm wondering if 60 SEALS could tear through legion after legion after legion given enough conventional firepower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top