Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No matter how flat the valley/basins of certain cities are, the fact that those cities have Hills and Mountains running through or around them in the city-limits, or metro areas, should disqualify them. There are other cities in the US that are TRULY flat, in the sense that there are no Hills over 200ft anywhere in the metro. LV, Phoenix, LA, are too close to mountains terrain, to be considered "flat" in the same way Miami truly is. Especially a city like LA that actually has Mountains running through, and biseccting the geographic core of the County in Half. And plus, there's plenty of foothill areas in LA that reach 200+ feet in elevation, such as Baldwin Hills, View Park, Windsor Hills, City Terrrace in East LA, the Hollywood Hills, Beverly Hills, etc. Houston and Dallas are close, but they actually can get rather frigid in the winter. The only city that should truly be on this list is Miami.
Status:
"Pickleball-Free American"
(set 10 days ago)
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,483 posts, read 44,141,494 times
Reputation: 16886
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle19125
South Florida overwhelmingly isn't set up on a grid system.
Checked out a map of Miami/Fort Lauderdale lately? There's a reason the streets are numbered.
St. Petersburg fits the criteria as well.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.