Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2010, 09:42 PM
 
Location: Southern Minnesota
5,984 posts, read 13,407,878 times
Reputation: 3371

Advertisements

I drew up another "regions" map, similar to my Midwest, West, South and Northeast maps of a few months ago. This one is different in several ways:

1) I included Mexico, Canada, the Caribbean, Central America and Greenland. I ignored international boundaries in drawing the regions (unless the border really does define a cultural region).

2) I included all of North America in one map, instead of breaking it up into four sections.

3) I ignored labels like "Midwest," "South," "Northeast," etc., and just put in what I think are broad cultural and socioeconomic regions, for example, "Great Lakes."

So, here's the map. I'm sure most people will disagree with something:

Regions of North America
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2010, 12:41 AM
 
Location: America
5,092 posts, read 8,842,323 times
Reputation: 1971
it's late, so all i could think of was that the blue part of texas needs to be moved further west to include san antonio, and houston should be shaded in maroon with the rest of the south
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2010, 12:47 AM
 
Location: New Hampshire
2,257 posts, read 8,168,736 times
Reputation: 4108
Why not make a separate region for Quebec? If any region of North America is distinct from its surroundings, it's Quebec! I can't see any reason to include it with New England, with the possible exception of some areas of the Eastern Townships. Northern New England definitely has more in common with southern New England than with Quebec.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2010, 12:50 AM
 
Location: Boston
1,214 posts, read 2,518,230 times
Reputation: 2017
Really interesting, I like it. But, shouldn't New Orleans be the capital of the Gulf Coast, and Denver the capital of the Rockies? And maybe Vancouver could replace Seattle or be equal with it? But I'm no expert on that. And as long as you have Ottawa in New England, shouldn't that be the capital? Also, I'd change the name to like North Atlantic or New England/Eastern Canada or something like that.

Last edited by missRoxyhart; 08-23-2010 at 01:20 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2010, 01:18 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, United States
4,230 posts, read 10,480,380 times
Reputation: 1444
Capital of the Gulf Coast should go to Houston or New Orleans. The Gulf Coast shouldn't stretch more than 30 miles north of the I-10 and that's stretching it IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2010, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,873 posts, read 37,997,315 times
Reputation: 11640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Verseau View Post
Why not make a separate region for Quebec? If any region of North America is distinct from its surroundings, it's Quebec! I can't see any reason to include it with New England, with the possible exception of some areas of the Eastern Townships. Northern New England definitely has more in common with southern New England than with Quebec.
Even the Eastern Townships are for the most part are similar in culture to the rest of Quebec these days. The older parts of towns and place names may sometimes be New Englandish, but around the dinner table in those places it is generally pretty Québécois.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2010, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,873 posts, read 37,997,315 times
Reputation: 11640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Verseau View Post
Why not make a separate region for Quebec? If any region of North America is distinct from its surroundings, it's Quebec! .
Very true.

Alternatively, you could create a region called "New France", that would include a few towns in extreme Eastern Ontario (places like Hawkesbury and Casselman, but not Cornwall), go across Quebec and then into northwestern and northeastern New Brunswick, and then down the eastern coast of New Brunswick to the boundaries of (but not including) the city of Moncton. If you acted fast (before French dies out there), you might even be able to throw half a dozen small towns in extreme northern Maine like Fort Kent and Madawaska in there as well.

Also, Ottawa is certainly not "New England", nor is it "Quebec" or "New France". Ottawa is more "Great Lakes" I would say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2010, 09:01 AM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,598,982 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingwriter View Post
I drew up another "regions" map, similar to my Midwest, West, South and Northeast maps of a few months ago. This one is different in several ways:

1) I included Mexico, Canada, the Caribbean, Central America and Greenland. I ignored international boundaries in drawing the regions (unless the border really does define a cultural region).

2) I included all of North America in one map, instead of breaking it up into four sections.

3) I ignored labels like "Midwest," "South," "Northeast," etc., and just put in what I think are broad cultural and socioeconomic regions, for example, "Great Lakes."

So, here's the map. I'm sure most people will disagree with something:

Regions of North America
LOL You are right. I can't agree at all that most of Texas has much of anything (if indeed anything) in common with northern plains states, and up into Canada. Either historically, culturally or socio-economically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2010, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Florida
11,669 posts, read 17,937,475 times
Reputation: 8239
I think it's a fairly accurate map, but only just "fair." My biggest criticism is your New England area. How can you not include Connecticut and Rhode Island on there?!?! They are very characteristic of quintessential New England.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2010, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,397,087 times
Reputation: 5358
I'm curious how Detroit becomes the capital of the "Great Lakes" region and not, say, Chicago or Toronto...I also think Omaha, Indianapolis and Columbus should/would both be considered more part of the "Corn Belt"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top