The Economist endorses Barack Obama. (Limbaugh, John Kerry, interview, Reagan)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What difference does it make if it was Margaret Thatcher's favorite paper? I read my local paper, and the NY Times, which are very liberal and I'm a conservative. It, like most news media, leans to the liberal view, especially in 2008, we're not talking of Thatcher's era. After all, they're endorsing Obama!
What difference does it make if it was Margaret Thatcher's favorite paper? I read my local paper, and the NY Times, which are very liberal and I'm a conservative. It, like most news media, leans to the liberal view, especially in 2008, we're not talking of Thatcher's era. After all, they're endorsing Obama!
There's a difference between saying "liberal rag" and "left-leaning publication".
What difference does it make if it was Margaret Thatcher's favorite paper? I read my local paper, and the NY Times, which are very liberal and I'm a conservative. It, like most news media, leans to the liberal view, especially in 2008, we're not talking of Thatcher's era. After all, they're endorsing Obama!
It's a liberal leaning rag, as most of them are. Obama is not fit to be POTUS, more and more people are becoming aware of that. He will take us into a socialist state, kill enterprise, cause a recession or depression. More and more believe that. Sorry, I don't take chances with regards to my country.
Right, just throw that out there. How on earth do you figure that?
It's a liberal leaning rag, as most of them are. Obama is not fit to be POTUS, more and more people are becoming aware of that. He will take us into a socialist state, kill enterprise, cause a recession or depression. More and more believe that. Sorry, I don't take chances with regards to my country.
Nope. The Economist is libertarian and free market oriented, unlike the candidate you support.
It's a liberal leaning rag, as most of them are. Obama is not fit to be POTUS, more and more people are becoming aware of that. He will take us into a socialist state, kill enterprise, cause a recession or depression. More and more believe that. Sorry, I don't take chances with regards to my country.
I have a degree in Economics and I had to reply to the most idiotic post of the day. The Economist is one of the most respected economic publications in the world if not the most respected. Their articles are usually balanced, accurate and thought provoking. Obviously, you have never read the Economist in your life but if you are looking for something a bit more intellectual than FOX News and/or Rush Limbaugh, I would definitely recommend it.
Ugh, I guess I have to go over this again. Obama advocates socialist policies...he will enact the most aggressive push to socialism that our country has ever seen. Are you trying to say that Obama is "free market" and "conservative"? No, I didn't think so. So, I guess "The Economist" is more liberal than you thought.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
