Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-16-2008, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Seward, Alaska
2,741 posts, read 8,890,153 times
Reputation: 2026

Advertisements

Finally, the truth: Obama hates plumbers!


Bud
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-16-2008, 11:38 AM
 
19,922 posts, read 11,050,993 times
Reputation: 27395
Quote:
Originally Posted by *Danielle* View Post
OK...so lets get this straight...Joe the rich ass plumber,,,who is tetering on the decision on buying his company...Is bent out of shape about a 3% tax increase because he makes over a 1/4 million/year...but will get a $3000.00 credit for each person he hires and a 50% tax credit on health care... But unfortunately does not have a plumbers license so now he will unemployeed in dire need of the "hand outs"...right?


This turned out to be another fantastic stratagy...
Correct, so whoever you support for President, Joe is now "Joe the Hired Hand".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
2,868 posts, read 9,557,490 times
Reputation: 1533
Quote:
Originally Posted by BudinAk View Post
Finally, the truth: Obama hates plumbers!


Bud
Only plumbers that really are not plumbers because they do not have a license to plum....Faux plumbers if you will..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 11:43 AM
 
2,794 posts, read 4,159,192 times
Reputation: 1563
Thanks for the clean-up,Mods! All those threads sure were getting annoying!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 11:55 AM
 
25 posts, read 28,851 times
Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
Tax Credits: speak for themselves and it's the only way to give money to people who mostly don't pay any taxes in the first place. Some call it welfare.

The excessive taxing of successful people: not much more socialistic than this idea: The top individual income tax rate, for example, would be increased by 13%, to 39.6%; the next-highest rate would be raised to 36%. The top rates on capital gains and dividends would rise by a third, to 20%

The Social Security payroll tax would be raised between 16% to 32% for families making over $250,000 a year. This means that the real returns these people get from their lifetime payments into the retirement program will be driven below 0%, according to my own previous research, which was published by the Cato Institute and elsewhere.

Death Tax:
Mr. Obama also wants a permanent federal estate tax, with a top rate of 45%; his health-insurance plan includes a new payroll tax on employers; and he also contemplates several increases in the corporate income tax, including a new so-called windfall profits tax on oil companies.

Oil companies make one of the lowest profit margins in our business structure. The death Tax is designed to keep people from passing on their wealth to family members. Again this is the idea in a socialistic structure to keep anyone from having to much power and wealth....that's something you don't hear much in America.

His American Opportunity Tax Credit would provide a $4,000, fully refundable tax credit for college tuition expenses.

For 100 hours community service. That's $40/hr for untrained un-skilled workers obviously not coming out of their pocket since they are in school. So who pays? The people at the top that already pay. If you put a number on the people that pay from $1 and up 60% of Americans pay that but the average income comes out to $21.20/hr. So you tell me who pays.

His Mortgage Interest Tax Credit would provide a 10% credit -- refundable -- to offset mortgage interest payments for lower- and middle-income families. His Health Care Tax Credits, which the campaign says "will ensure that health insurance is available and affordable for all families," include "a new refundable 50 percent health tax credit on employee premiums paid by employers."

Currently existing tax credits would also become spending programs in the Obama tax program. The Savers Credit would be made fully refundable, and would be expanded, according to the campaign, "to match 50% of the first $1,000 of savings for families that earn under $75,000." The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit would be made refundable and expanded to allow "low-income families to receive up to a 50 percent credit on the first $6,000 of child care expenses."



I don't even know what to say over this.

The Earned Income Tax Credit is already refundable. Mr. Obama would expand it to "increase the number of working parents eligible for EITC benefits, increase the benefits available to noncustodial parents who fulfill their child support obligations, increase benefits for families with three or more children, and reduce the EITC marriage penalty, which hurts low-income families." In short, welfare spending is to be increased by paying more money out to low-income income tax filers.



The Earned Income Tax Credit is already refundable. Mr. Obama would expand it to "increase the number of working parents eligible for EITC benefits, increase the benefits available to noncustodial parents who fulfill their child support obligations, increase benefits for families with three or more children, and reduce the EITC marriage penalty, which hurts low-income families." In short, welfare spending is to be increased by paying more money out to low-income income tax filers.



All those should speak for themselves. The only thing we are short of is government buying up businesses......ohh well that's underway also. I see this as a huge leap towards socialism rather than hesitantly (through understanding what Socialism means and has meant throughout history) edging that way.


All that comes from:
Obama's Tax Plan Is Really a Welfare Plan - WSJ.com

And can be backed up by:
The Tax Foundation - Educating Taxpayers Since 1937
The Heritage Foundation - Conservative Policy Research and Analysis
The Foundation for Economic Education, home to free-market education, freedom and prosperity for over 50 years.
Tax Policy Center home
National Taxpayers Union & National Taxpayers Union Foundation
Citizens for Tax Justice Home Page CTJ
Thank you for this detailed sketch! I see much clearer now. Still, I question what does socialism in particular mean to you? Do you have an emotional stigma toward it and why? You list many points in Obama's plan which are, If I am understanding correctly, aimed toward a kind of standardization where standardization wasn't needed before. I understand that you do not like that idea. But surely there is a difference here between what Obama is proposing and socialism, isn't there? Or perhaps it is more "socialistic" than before. It is moving towards socialism, or something like that.

I am not socialist, nor am I promoting socialism. I am not educated enough on the subject. I am just curious how and why that word carries so much weight. Is it fear of becoming like the USSR? In a previous post, you mentioned that soon we will be called the USSA. Can you draw any parallels--specific parallels--between how the USSR conducted their tax plans and how Mr. Obama's intends to implement his tax plans? Or the progression toward certain government standardizations?

I see a weak connection between Obama's plan and the USSR, a connection driven mainly mainly by fear of becoming a former enemy and a fear of perhaps (by chance) adopting an opposing political ideology (maybe by mistake or gradually). It's true that the USSR failed, but is it not also true that America's free market capitalism has proved less than successful recently? We have moved far from Adam Smith and the invisible hand, though I think perhaps there is a way of retaining American capitalism and the political structures which support it while also entertaining certain socialist techniques in a time of economic crisis. In this respect, I don't see much of a difference between Obama and McCain other than Obama is focusing on quelling the economic crisis while McCain--based on what I've seen in the debates, which, granted, is not much--is focused on attacking Obama. Perhaps I'm just far too out of the loop.

Again, I want to stress that I am not socialist in the slightest. I'm to ignorant on the subject. I am not a political theorist or an economist. You did a terrific job of creating a realistic argument that was very well thought out and well supported. Thank you for taking the time to explain your thoughts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 11:56 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,928,226 times
Reputation: 4459
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
Didn't work that well...he was assassinated.
what kind of disrespectful answer is that? go back to london and worship your queen......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,984,873 times
Reputation: 7118
Is it not breathtaking to see the MSM go after this guy to try and destroy him?

For what? Because he asked The One a question that he stepped in and he has the gaul to criticize and call out Obama's policies for what they are.

The media has invested more time in JTP than Obama - Is that sad?

Obviously, if you work for someone else, you don't need a license for residential work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Ohio
826 posts, read 1,626,483 times
Reputation: 244
Default Joe the Plumber on MSNBC


YouTube - Joe the Plumber on social security, Iraq

Very good, stands up to this biased media channel
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
2,868 posts, read 9,557,490 times
Reputation: 1533
Wurzelbacher said Obama's tax plan wouldn't affect him right now, because he doesn't make $250,000. "But I hope someday I'll make that," he said.


So this faux plumber hypothosized a situation where he would make over 250,000/year..and Obama told him that he would have a 39% tax rate instead of a 36% tax rate....


so what is the issue with that? what is the point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,984,873 times
Reputation: 7118
Joe is in trouble. The media and the Obama thugs are coming after him. Coming after just your average, everyday, hard-working American. They must bring him down, destroy his credbility, his life.

They have set their sights on this guy all because he has made the One look bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top