Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-08-2008, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,616,189 times
Reputation: 1680

Advertisements

David Brooks spoke frankly about the presidential and vice presidential candidates Monday afternoon, calling Sarah Palin a "fatal cancer to the Republican party"
Source
Fatal Cancer?! Wow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-08-2008, 05:26 PM
 
1,648 posts, read 2,562,448 times
Reputation: 481
USA USA USA ... LOL, nutjob Palin 6 years 6 colleges 1 degree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2008, 06:29 PM
 
502 posts, read 1,067,153 times
Reputation: 329

YouTube - Noonan and Murphy on Palin
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2008, 06:32 PM
 
30,902 posts, read 33,039,040 times
Reputation: 26919
Sarah Palin is NOT cancer.

She's more like herpes, actually.

She just keeps rubbing at you, irritating you to the very core, and just when you think she's gone, BAM, she's back again.

(No, for the record, I don't have herpes. I avoid that by not having sex with people who have herpes. And I don't have a warlike, frightening, anti-Semitic, unknowledgeable and bigoted attitude. I avoid that by being a Democrat...)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2008, 06:33 PM
 
2,305 posts, read 3,046,583 times
Reputation: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ View Post
Sarah Palin is NOT cancer.

She's more like herpes, actually.

She just keeps rubbing at you, irritating you to the very core, and just when you think she's gone, BAM, she's back again.

(No, for the record, I don't have herpes. I avoid that by not having sex with people who have herpes. And I don't have a warlike, frightening, anti-Semitic, unknowledgeable and bigoted attitude. I avoid that by being a Democrat...)
Dang it! Would you please pace yourself! They won't allow me to give that many reps!!!

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2008, 06:33 PM
 
30,902 posts, read 33,039,040 times
Reputation: 26919
Hmmm. Wheels turning here...

...or maybe she's more like...colitis. She makes you incredibly uncomfortable and even embarrassed, and what generally comes of it is a whole bunch of.................
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2008, 06:36 PM
 
3,758 posts, read 8,446,757 times
Reputation: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ View Post
Sarah Palin is NOT cancer.

She's more like herpes, actually.

She just keeps rubbing at you, irritating you to the very core, and just when you think she's gone, BAM, she's back again.

(No, for the record, I don't have herpes. I avoid that by not having sex with people who have herpes. And I don't have a warlike, frightening, anti-Semitic, unknowledgeable and bigoted attitude. I avoid that by being a Democrat...)
However, McCain has herpes. Pardon the pun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2008, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
8,882 posts, read 19,870,356 times
Reputation: 3920
Quote:
Originally Posted by rightofcenter View Post
Dang it! Would you please pace yourself! They won't allow me to give that many reps!!!

I gave him/her one for ya.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2008, 06:43 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,930,216 times
Reputation: 4459
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
David Brooks spoke frankly about the presidential and vice presidential candidates Monday afternoon, calling Sarah Palin a "fatal cancer to the Republican party"
Source
Fatal Cancer?! Wow.
is there a surprise here? he is a canadian who has criticized conservatism:

In a March 2007 article published in the New York Times titled No U-Turns, Brooks explains that the Republican party must distance itself from the minimal-government conservative principles that had arisen during the Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan eras. He claims that these outdated concepts had served their purposes and should no longer be embraced by Republicans in order to win elections.


frankly, i think a lot of americans wish that we had a more minimalist government right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2008, 06:43 PM
 
2,305 posts, read 3,046,583 times
Reputation: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by magellan View Post
I gave him/her one for ya.
Thanks! (it's a her BTW, we've been down this path before...)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top