Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-25-2008, 06:45 AM
 
5,715 posts, read 15,051,258 times
Reputation: 2949

Advertisements

This morning in an interview with Matt Lauer, Bill Clinton admitted that the Bill signed during his administration -- regarding mortgages to lower income families -- was the real beginning of our current mortgage crisis.

Of course, he said "it was much safer at the time..."

Good for you, Matt. Great interview.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-25-2008, 06:46 AM
 
2,857 posts, read 6,728,818 times
Reputation: 1748
Yes, the bill he signed that was created by the Republican-controlled legislature. And we have had Republican-controlled legislature for 6 of the 8 years Bush has sat on his thrown. Plently of time for the Republicans to reverse this position if they had cared.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2008, 06:51 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,333 posts, read 54,445,037 times
Reputation: 40736
Good for Bubba admitting it was the beginning.

Now what are the odds his successor will ever take his blinders off and admit he's been involved in any bad decisions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2008, 06:51 AM
 
5,524 posts, read 9,943,650 times
Reputation: 1867
Sure he signed the bill....then the shady lenders and investments firms on wall street all ran with it. Investment firms started banking on that money, lenders got greedy and it all fell to s**t. They had 8 years to do something about it after the fact. Glad to see people waited until the 11th hour to start working on a solution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2008, 07:08 AM
 
5,715 posts, read 15,051,258 times
Reputation: 2949
Quote:
Originally Posted by domino View Post
Yes, the bill he signed that was created by the Republican-controlled legislature. And we have had Republican-controlled legislature for 6 of the 8 years Bush has sat on his thrown. Plently of time for the Republicans to reverse this position if they had cared.
I'd really like to research that. Do you happen to know the name (and number) of the bill in question?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2008, 07:11 AM
 
2,857 posts, read 6,728,818 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by World Citizen View Post
I'd really like to research that. Do you happen to know the name (and number) of the bill in question?
No I don't, but in 1994 the Republicans became the majority party in both the House and the Senate. This continued through Clinton's administration and into W's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2008, 07:14 AM
 
Location: The Beautiful Pocono Mountains
5,450 posts, read 8,767,865 times
Reputation: 3002
We couldn't do anything in those years, always too busy trying to bail the Clinton's out of their personal messes.

How come no one ever complains about the money we wasted on them in legal fees, hours, etc.?

Talk about blinders??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2008, 07:16 AM
Noc
 
1,435 posts, read 2,071,223 times
Reputation: 614
It doesn't really matter who got the bill signed. It was the lack of oversight that followed and no one acting quickly to nip it in the butt before it got out of hand. It was still a good bill to pass. If they regulated they could have put the brakes of those trying to take advantage of the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2008, 07:17 AM
 
2,857 posts, read 6,728,818 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerseyt719 View Post
We couldn't do anything in those years, always too busy trying to bail the Clinton's out of their personal messes.

How come no one ever complains about the money we wasted on them in legal fees, hours, etc.?

Talk about blinders??
You mean too busy wasting taxpayer money trying to pin something on Clinton. Starr was a joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2008, 07:19 AM
 
Location: The Beautiful Pocono Mountains
5,450 posts, read 8,767,865 times
Reputation: 3002
Right.....

See, blinders
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top