Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-20-2008, 04:08 PM
BVH
 
Location: Pennsylvania
944 posts, read 609,761 times
Reputation: 79

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by teatime View Post

When you think about the exit poll demographics, this makes a whole lot of sense. Remember how it's been reported that Obama is getting a HUGE majority of voters earning over $150,000? The mainstream of the Democratic Party has traditionally been comprised of blue-collar and middle class folks.
Good point! Sometimes we get so deep into the trees that we fail to notice the forest....I failed to make the connection. Thank you for pointing that out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-20-2008, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, NJ
9,847 posts, read 25,316,113 times
Reputation: 3631
Quote:
Originally Posted by domergurl View Post
I don't know about that ... Froma Harrop wrote a decent article about it this morning:

Vaporous Obama Turns Off Many Centrists by Froma Harrop on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent
I would buy that more if McCain wasn't so hawkish on Iraq. I just don't see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2008, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Texas
8,064 posts, read 18,054,559 times
Reputation: 3732
Quote:
Originally Posted by NooYowkur81 View Post
Secondly, I don't see a whole bunch of democrats, even if they are to the center or even to the right, going towards McCain. I just don't see it, especially after eight years of Bush.
In the Dem. blogs I read and sometimes participate in, the anger at the Democratic Party for hanging Hillary out to dry is PALPABLE and getting stronger. Many folks are talking about registering as Independents and either voting for McCain or not voting for president in the general election. It's at the point where the Obama people are getting worried and begging people to stick with the party and vote for Obama if he gets the nomination.

Thus, if this article is correct and Rove and the Gang have been manipulating the Dem. primaries, some of Obama's GOP support will retreat after the mischief-making is done and the Hillary (and to some degree, the Edwards) supporters will be turning their backs on the Democratic Party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2008, 04:16 PM
BVH
 
Location: Pennsylvania
944 posts, read 609,761 times
Reputation: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by NooYowkur81 View Post
Secondly, I don't see a whole bunch of democrats, even if they are to the center or even to the right, going towards McCain. I just don't see it, especially after eight years of Bush.
The problem with this argument is that McCain ISN'T Bush. Not even close, in fact. (Yes, I realize he's pandering to the conservatives at the moment.) They call him a "maverick" because he's constantly viewed as being outside the "mainstream" of Republican politics. In this case, the "mainstream" that he is outside of is the radical right-wing evangelical 'christian' faction of the Republican Party.

McCain is clearly a centrist Republican. Why do you think so many Republicans are as pissed at him? That is a distinct plus for Democratic leaning centrists such as myself and a large number of other Hillary supporters.

If the ultra-liberal Socialist faction of the Democratic party continues to choose to nominate an unelectable general election candidate, McCain is where we'll go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2008, 04:20 PM
BVH
 
Location: Pennsylvania
944 posts, read 609,761 times
Reputation: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by NooYowkur81 View Post
I would buy that more if McCain wasn't so hawkish on Iraq. I just don't see it.
The reality of the situation at this point is that we will never leave Iraq regardless of WHO is elected. We are entrenched there and will always have Korea-like presence there. As a matter of fact, BUSH is going to see to it that that happens by cuircumventing Congress and establishing a treaty to that effect.

Do I want to be in Iraq for "100 years"? Hell no. But, the die is already cast and neither Hillary, Obama nor McCain can change it. Period. I think that all 3 would in fact remove the majority of the troops however because American's as a whole are sick of this $500,000-a-minute war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2008, 04:20 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,409,177 times
Reputation: 7627
Ah, I feel like I'm the only one present who's noticed the emperor has no clothes.

Did ANY of you bother to read the article and then LINK to the Time magazine webpage supposedly used to provide proof of the article authors' claim?

DUH!

The Time article does nothing of the sort. In fact, the article indicates that the Republicans pushing for Obama are doing so because they are UNHAPPY WITH THEIR REPUBLICAN CHOICES - and to me that seems to be the case. Go out to Hannity.com for example - which is overflowing with hard-core Conservatives and you'll see just how unhappy so many Republicans are. While few of THOSE posters - who tend to be very right-wing - are likely to vote for Obama, many of them are indicating they will stay out of the election all together so it doesn't surprise me that other (more central) Republicans are planning on switching sides - that happens for some members of both parties in virtually every election.

The main article is wishful thinking BS.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2008, 04:25 PM
 
Location: Texas
8,064 posts, read 18,054,559 times
Reputation: 3732
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Ah, I feel like I'm the only one present who's noticed the emperor has no clothes.

Did ANY of you bother to read the article and then LINK to the Time magazine webpage supposedly used to provide proof of the article authors' claim?

DUH!

The Time article does nothing of the sort. In fact, the article indicates that the Republicans pushing for Obama are doing so because they are UNHAPPY WITH THEIR REPUBLICAN CHOICES - and to me that seems to be the case. Go out to Hannity.com for example - which is overflowing with hard-core Conservatives and you'll see just how unhappy so many Republicans are. While few of THOSE posters - who tend to be very right-wing - are likely to vote for Obama, many of them are indicating they will stay out of the election all together so it doesn't surprise me that other (more central) Republicans are planning on switching sides - that happens for some members of both parties in virtually every election.

The main article is wishful thinking BS.

Ken
Of course I read it and the author of the main article WANTED everyone to read it. The link was posted as an example of how illogically the mainstream media is ga-ga over Obama and the main article showed how stupid the Time article's assertions were. (i.e. we're expected to believe that a large number of Republicans were SO impressed by Obama's speech in 2004 that they'll vote for THE most liberal Senator in the country?! )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2008, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, NJ
9,847 posts, read 25,316,113 times
Reputation: 3631
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Ah, I feel like I'm the only one present who's noticed the emperor has no clothes.

Did ANY of you bother to read the article and then LINK to the Time magazine webpage supposedly used to provide proof of the article authors' claim?

DUH!

The Time article does nothing of the sort. In fact, the article indicates that the Republicans pushing for Obama are doing so because they are UNHAPPY WITH THEIR REPUBLICAN CHOICES - and to me that seems to be the case. Go out to Hannity.com for example - which is overflowing with hard-core Conservatives and you'll see just how unhappy so many Republicans are. While few of THOSE posters - who tend to be very right-wing - are likely to vote for Obama, many of them are indicating they will stay out of the election all together so it doesn't surprise me that other (more central) Republicans are planning on switching sides - that happens for some members of both parties in virtually every election.

The main article is wishful thinking BS.

Ken
Plus people are forgetting to mention all the Independent voters who actually like Obama. They are a sizeable chunk as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2008, 04:30 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,409,177 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by teatime View Post
Of course I read it and the author of the main article WANTED everyone to read it. The link was posted as an example of how illogically the mainstream media is ga-ga over Obama and the main article showed how stupid the Time article's assertions were. (i.e. we're expected to believe that a large number of Republicans were SO impressed by Obama's speech in 2004 that they'll vote for THE most liberal Senator in the country?! )
Go to Hannity.com and see for your self just how extremely unhappy the right wing of the Republican party is.

Why do you think their primary turnout numbers have been so low? They hate their candidate. Others among them feel betrayed by the fiscal irresponsibilities of Bush and the current crop of Republicans in Congress.

A large number of Republicans ARE unhappy - intensely so in fact - some of them so much so that they want to teach their party a lessen or have given up on it completely.

Again, don't just take my word for it - visit the Conservative message boards and see what the members are saying - many of them LONG TIME members of the boards. They are a pretty unhappy bunch.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2008, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, NJ
9,847 posts, read 25,316,113 times
Reputation: 3631
Yeah maybe there's dems or hardcore Hillary backers switching to McCain but its kinda offset by all the pissed off Reps that aren't supporting McCain, plus throw in the Independents who like Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top