Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-26-2014, 07:56 AM
 
566 posts, read 888,929 times
Reputation: 782

Advertisements

So apparently I've been hearing that out of the 139 primary races that we had across the country, not one incumbent was unseated. Despite having historically low congressional approval ratings. This is ludicrous! I find it really odd however, that I can only find information about this on various blogs and offbeat newspapers.. Does anyone else find this disturbing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2014, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,453,455 times
Reputation: 4586
Most of them bring home the bacon and, thus, will continue to win most of the time - even in primaries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2014, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,212 posts, read 19,509,699 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listennow32 View Post
So apparently I've been hearing that out of the 139 primary races that we had across the country, not one incumbent was unseated. Despite having historically low congressional approval ratings. This is ludicrous! I find it really odd however, that I can only find information about this on various blogs and offbeat newspapers.. Does anyone else find this disturbing?
Yes, it is disturbing, and it is the result of gerrymandering. Something needs to be done to quit carving districts into either blue or red.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2014, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,851,639 times
Reputation: 10371
It is a joke. People need to stop complaining if they continue to vote for the same ones who put us in this mess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2014, 11:07 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,212 posts, read 22,344,773 times
Reputation: 23853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
It is a joke. People need to stop complaining if they continue to vote for the same ones who put us in this mess.
Traditionally, the off year elections always tend to favor the incumbents in the primaries. A big part of why this is so is due to the much lower voter turnout that almost always happens. The voters who are most likely to show up are the voters who seldom miss any ballot measure- they're the same ones who vote for local school bonds and other local elections and all the other small ones, and these voters always tend to vote for the incumbents unless the incumbent has completely hit bottom somehow recently.

The Republican party's heavy pushback against the tea party, and the following election results shows the tea party agenda has largely succeeded in turning the party further toward the right, but the agenda may be beginning to crumble after the government shutdown of last year.

It's easier for a conservative incumbent to move toward the middle than it is for a challenger, especially a first timer. The pressure from all the public to get Congress to end the deadlock and go to work also favored the incumbents, as they're the ones who are congressional committee and caucus leaders. The challengers would all be junior members at a time when senior members are the only ones who can break the deadlock.

Since the House is Republican, the voters gave them very clear marching orders. This has happened before many times; it was another last-chance election, and a sign that if the deadlock does not change, the House could swing to the Democrats in 2016 as it did in 2006.

There is very little support for throwing all the bums out at once now. The 2010 election did that when it put a bunch of the tea party into Congress and they failed. In a time like this, voters will go for the one they know, even if they don't much like the person, rather than making a riskier choice with someone they don't know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2014, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,672,365 times
Reputation: 49248
there are reasons for this: no, not a reason for not making the news, but for incumbents having the edge: 1-mid term elections, specially the primaries do not hold the same interest as the elections during a presidential election year and name recognition plays a part. Just because an incumbent wins the primary, does not make him or her a shoe in to win the general election. In the states that also have governor elections you will see a better turn out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2014, 02:29 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
Yes, it is disturbing, and it is the result of gerrymandering. Something needs to be done to quit carving districts into either blue or red.
No it isn't. It's because people foolishly continue to vote for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2014, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,621,734 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
No it isn't. It's because people foolishly continue to vote for them.
True, but they may feel they had no other good alternative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2014, 06:36 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,672,365 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
True, but they may feel they had no other good alternative.
and many time the incumbent is running unopposed or their competition is a total unknown or not qualified experience wise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2014, 07:13 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
and many time the incumbent is running unopposed or their competition is a total unknown or not qualified experience wise.
Then come the general you have to vote for him because of the letter after his name no matter how sucky he has been.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top