Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-31-2014, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Vegas
1,782 posts, read 2,151,411 times
Reputation: 1789

Advertisements

Instead, they'll focus on damage control in the Senate.

Via Politico, "Democrats: Cede the House to save the Senate" @ Democrats: Cede the House to save the Senate - Alex Isenstadt - POLITICO.com

With Democrats’ grasp on the Senate increasingly tenuous — and the House all but beyond reach — some top party donors and strategists are moving to do something in the midterm election as painful as it is coldblooded: Admit the House can’t be won and go all in to save the Senate.

And, even after pouring millions into Senate races, it's not clear the Democrats can even keep control of that. Thanks you Obama and the ACA. [We don't want to offend anyone by calling it Obamacare]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2014, 08:14 AM
 
4,412 posts, read 3,980,219 times
Reputation: 2326
The House is going to be controlled by Republicans until after 2020. Gerrymandering has pretty much guaranteed that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2014, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,382,110 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
The House is going to be controlled by Republicans until after 2020. Gerrymandering has pretty much guaranteed that.
Something I thought the Republicans already knew. They should be kissing Michael Steele's butt for delivering the House to them instead of booting him from his job and replacing him with a guy who always sounds drunk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2014, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Kennedy Heights, Ohio. USA
3,871 posts, read 3,202,411 times
Reputation: 2282
Maybe if the Democrats when they had control of the House governed according to the interests of the voters who voted them in instead of the moneyed corporate interests they wouldn't be in this dilemma.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2014, 11:18 AM
 
4,683 posts, read 3,476,719 times
Reputation: 2668
Hell, if the Pelosi House at least pretended to wait a few days to pretend the read the ACA bill before voting they may have still had the house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2014, 11:23 AM
 
12,264 posts, read 6,534,584 times
Reputation: 9442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coseau View Post
Maybe if the Democrats when they had control of the House governed according to the interests of the voters who voted them in instead of the moneyed corporate interests they wouldn't be in this dilemma.
This is funny. Koch Bros., Halliburton, etc.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2014, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,669 posts, read 16,728,666 times
Reputation: 6092
Quote:
Originally Posted by sargentodiaz View Post
Instead, they'll focus on damage control in the Senate.

Via Politico, "Democrats: Cede the House to save the Senate" @ Democrats: Cede the House to save the Senate - Alex Isenstadt - POLITICO.com

With Democrats’ grasp on the Senate increasingly tenuous — and the House all but beyond reach — some top party donors and strategists are moving to do something in the midterm election as painful as it is coldblooded: Admit the House can’t be won and go all in to save the Senate.

And, even after pouring millions into Senate races, it's not clear the Democrats can even keep control of that. Thanks you Obama and the ACA. [We don't want to offend anyone by calling it Obamacare]
This article does not back up any of its claim, the only example it uses is George MIller and he won his House district 58 to 31 in 2012.

This is an opinion piece people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2014, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,268 posts, read 22,617,626 times
Reputation: 23940
Don't believe it for a second. The Democratic candidates are out to win, and will work hard to do it.
The gerrymandering makes some of the districts very difficult, but nobody is conceding anything right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2014, 01:06 AM
 
Location: SoCal
5,899 posts, read 5,840,635 times
Reputation: 1930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
The House is going to be controlled by Republicans until after 2020. Gerrymandering has pretty much guaranteed that.
Yes, this is very likely, and this is a good point to use in order to argue in favor of redistricting reform.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2014, 10:06 AM
 
4,683 posts, read 3,476,719 times
Reputation: 2668
Though i am in favor of redistricting reform, whatever plan is adopted needs to have many safeguards than California's system, which was circumvented by the parties right out of the gate.

How Democrats Fooled California’s Redistricting Commission - ProPublica


Now rather than degenerate into a democrat bash, kudos to them for figuring out how to legally game the system, instead I would rather use this as an education: Any other attempts at redistricting commissions need to have some form of "testimony under oath" aspect with perjury penalties. That would repair the lacking confidence in Ca's system. So when little granny Perkins from Colton testifies that she really wants her community in district x, and we find out later that in reality that she is a professional gerrymandering expert from Boise ID hired by the SEIU, which in several instnces really happened, she would be looking at some jail time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top