Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The two candidates have been tied or Obama has been ahead for the past three weeks or so. (Interestingly, they were exactly tied on the date 100 days before the election...the Gallup poll 100 days out has historically been very predictive.)
This can't be right. There are 356 threads here about how the selection of Paul Ryan will destroy the GOP's chances for the White House. Clearly Gallup reversed the numbers.
This can't be right. There are 356 threads here about how the selection of Paul Ryan will destroy the GOP's chances for the White House. Clearly Gallup reversed the numbers.
Or, as some liberals allege, that Romney chose Ryan because he was "intentionally conceding" the election.
The two candidates have been tied or Obama has been ahead for the past three weeks or so. (Interestingly, they were exactly tied on the date 100 days before the election...the Gallup poll 100 days out has historically been very predictive.)
Or, as some liberals allege, that Romney chose Ryan because he was "intentionally conceding" the election.
LOL....exactly. It's these types of comments from the liberal side of the aisle that make me question why I even dignify liberal points of view sometimes. Seriously......who in their right mind would actually think something like this if they weren't mentally disturbed or severely retarded?
Lol, a bump is always expected after a vice- presidential pick. Duh :0
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.