Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
After reading some of the replies on another thread I felt I had to ask this. If Paul gets the GOP nomination, who should his running mate be? I ask this because it is very important to the Independent Voters and many Republicans. We saw how the last election for the Whitehouse went and what affect the running mate had on the election, who would You want as Pauls running mate?
Casper
this is a tough to discuss i think depending on how ron paul views his runnning mate on economics etc he might find someone who helped him audit the fed. Or has the general ideas on liberty thou he could look at the people running against him in the primaries but have to see about that.
I think you might be putting the cart before the horse.
Signed,
The horse
Hmmmmm, I see speculation all the time on this board, but all of a sudden few want to even try and name his running mate. Am I asking a question you are afraid to answer because the answer might turn people off to Paul?
I will add that I only ask this about Paul because if anyone else gets the GOP nomination it will not matter who their running mate is, they will lose anyway. IMO only Paul stands a chance of drawing in enough Inde voters to get elected but the choice of running mate can swing it away or towards him.
Casper
The governors should pick somebody with foreign affairs experience.
You just love Perry dont you? lol
What is the interest in executives seriously many of our great presidents didnt need to be executives in fact I would prefer someone who doesn't have that background.
From this race of republicans I don't need someone who thinks like a democrat supported democrats, likes to ship jobs overseas, like state run healthcare and is a prick.
I'm just sayings.
Casper is just being theoretical. Paul/Romney would probably be the case, but Romney/Paul would have a much better shot at victory.
That would be an odd couple pairing as Romney is a Progressive with the history to prove it. (Romneycare, Mass. AWB, against state's rights). For the life of me I cannot understand why some self-professed conservatives keep rushing to back the Bilderburger globalists with the biggest smile and best hair.
I honestly don't see anyone in the Republican party worthy of that position.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
