Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-30-2009, 10:53 AM
 
Location: underworld
45 posts, read 157,944 times
Reputation: 25

Advertisements

The standard of living in the early 20th century during the Great Depression was totally different than today.
Cars were a rare and new luxury that only the Astors could afford.
Most people still lived in the horse and buggy and 40 acre farm stage.
Imagine people today losing everything compared to those back then that didn't have much anyway.
Good Luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-30-2009, 10:59 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,753,831 times
Reputation: 14746
Technology has come a long way since the 1930's. Not to mention, here in the U.S. we subsidize food, water, and housing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2009, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,831,531 times
Reputation: 14116
Quote:
Originally Posted by 24kgold View Post
Cars were a rare and new luxury that only the Astors could afford.
Most people still lived in the horse and buggy and 40 acre farm stage.
Funny, I thought Henry Ford changed that in the teens, well before the depression.

Ford Model T - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2009, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Business ethics is an oxymoron.
2,347 posts, read 3,337,383 times
Reputation: 5382
Of course the Recession is over.

Who you going to believe?

Me and my trusty Power Point presentation?

Or your lying eyes?

Signed,
Ben "Dover" Bernanke
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2009, 01:54 PM
 
Location: underworld
45 posts, read 157,944 times
Reputation: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post
Funny, I thought Henry Ford changed that in the teens, well before the depression.

Ford Model T - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 out of 10 Americans owning cars back then compared to everyone owning cars today, some with several cars, is not the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2009, 02:33 PM
 
8,423 posts, read 7,429,154 times
Reputation: 8776
Quote:
Originally Posted by 24kgold View Post
1 out of 10 Americans owning cars back then compared to everyone owning cars today, some with several cars, is not the same.
24kgold, i think you are wrong.

In 1920, one in three households in the United States owned an automobile.

By 1930, four out of five household owned an automobile.

The Great Depression was 1930 to 1940 (roughly).

In 2006, there were about 250,000,000 registered vehicles in the United States. At that time there were about 116,000,000 households. While roughly 2 cars per household in 2006 is a greater ratio than in 1930, at least 80% of the American households owned at least one car in 1930. That's a far cry from "1 out of 10 Americans owning cars".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2009, 04:07 AM
 
4,010 posts, read 10,217,675 times
Reputation: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
While roughly 2 cars per household in 2006 is a greater ratio than in 1930, at least 80% of the American households owned at least one car in 1930. That's a far cry from "1 out of 10 Americans owning cars".
Your math is completely flawed because it assumes a household is the same size now as it was during the depression and that simply isn't true. You also did not give your numbers for the 1930s which are needed to draw that conclusion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2009, 07:12 AM
 
8,423 posts, read 7,429,154 times
Reputation: 8776
Quote:
Originally Posted by lumbollo View Post
Your math is completely flawed because it assumes a household is the same size now as it was during the depression and that simply isn't true. You also did not give your numbers for the 1930s which are needed to draw that conclusion.
The numbers for 1920 and 1930 were taken directly from sources available on the web. I don't have the sources here at work, but you can certainly look them up yourself.

The numbers for 2006 were taken from government sources - 250 million registered vehicles from the US Department of Transportation, 116 million households from the US Census Bureau.

My only arithmetic was dividing 250 million vehicles by 116 million households to obtain an average of 2 vehicles per household. I never estimated the size of a current household. I will concede that there are some households in the United States that don't own any automobiles.

Lumbollo, your assumptions as to my "flawed math" are, well, flawed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2009, 01:44 PM
 
30,904 posts, read 36,989,319 times
Reputation: 34552
Quote:
Originally Posted by lumbollo View Post
Actually if you count unemployment as they did years ago, then the number is running around 22% of those they know about. I don't know about you, but 1 out 5 people who want to work full time, that are not, is a pretty bad statistic IMO.
That's a bunch of baloney. The true unemployment rate is always lower than the stated rate. Always has been. Nothing new here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2009, 01:50 PM
 
30,904 posts, read 36,989,319 times
Reputation: 34552
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post
Not a recession, a depression. But even in the depths of the Great Depression life still went on. The whole world doesn't stop.
It was NOT a depression. A serious recession, yes. Depression, no. Very few of us were alive during the Great Depression. That was a real depression. 10% unemployment is not. 25% unemployment like they had during the Great Depression is. And as I said in another post, the true unemployment rate is always higher than the official rate. It was as true in the 1930s as it is now.

The government bailout of the banks averted a true Depression. However, I once read an interesting analogy....the financial crisis presented us with a choice between a car crash and cancer. We opted for cancer.

All we really did was push the problem forward a few more years....We're all going find out what a real depression looks and feels like soon enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top