Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-09-2008, 11:59 AM
 
3,459 posts, read 5,806,434 times
Reputation: 6677

Advertisements

A lot of people would love to go back to the gold standard, but history has shown us that there are some problems with that approach. (cornering the market, etc.)

A while ago, another poster on CD mentioned pegging the dollar to units of energy, and the more I think about it, the more I like the idea. It would promote energy efficiency and alternative fuels, and the price of coal would skyrocket. Since we export so much coal to China, it would likely fix the trade deficit as well.

I look forward to hearing everybody's thoughts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-09-2008, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,893,508 times
Reputation: 24863
I do not even want to mine the stuff let alone burn it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 02:37 PM
 
3,459 posts, read 5,806,434 times
Reputation: 6677
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I do not even want to mine the stuff let alone burn it.
Pegging the dollar to energy would actually help to decrease the amount of coal burned because coal prices would rise in relation to oil.

These two factors would encourage alternative forms of energy, such as burning biomass, to be more profitable, and coal fired electricity to be less profitable.

Countries like China that don't care how much they pollute, would wind up paying a lot more for their power, and countries using renewable energy would be rewarded.

It would also help to make sure that price fixing by big oil isn't able to destroy the renewable energy market like it did back in the 70s. If you're guaranteed a certain number of dollars per Watt or BTU, its a lot safer bet to open up those alternative energy sources, and they wouldn't need ridiculous subsidies like ethanol does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top