Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2013, 11:23 AM
 
Location: The Woodlands
805 posts, read 1,876,956 times
Reputation: 1077

Advertisements

Income based. Govts will always find new and 'important' (to them) things to spend money on, they cant be trusted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-21-2013, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Taos NM
5,368 posts, read 5,166,545 times
Reputation: 6816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willy702 View Post
To make by income work you would basically have to tell everyone who gets a check from the government that what you receive from us won't be known until we cut you the check and its going to be kind of late since we first have to count every source of money and expense and then figure out what goes where so we have a perfect balance.

So if you were say a concrete contractor and were working on a new road, you better have enough to pay all your workers and your suppliers first and then hope what we give you is enough to cover what you paid out. Repeat this exercise at all levels for a myriad of jobs and you can see it doesn't quite work well.

The obsession with a balanced budget is unrealistic. Its a great thought, but it just doesn't happen. What is wrong with the whole debate is how so many forget when times are good you must generate a surplus and pay down some debt drawn when times were not so good and set a little aside for future rough patches.
The issue in this debate is not so much the timing of the expenditures - whether we use last tax seasons money or ones to come - as it is which takes precedence. Should the governments expenditures be the principle to which the income is dictated or vice versa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2013, 10:47 PM
 
6,386 posts, read 11,908,707 times
Reputation: 6886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil P View Post
The issue in this debate is not so much the timing of the expenditures - whether we use last tax seasons money or ones to come - as it is which takes precedence. Should the governments expenditures be the principle to which the income is dictated or vice versa.
Doesn't matter what period you use, its still difficult to be income based. Sure my example was extending things a bit, but I still maintain if you want to have an orderly society you really have to assume fairly stable spending levels with modest inflationary growth. Hiring and firing of the civil service because of how the tax collector did last year is no way to run a government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top