I'm not understanding why they were shooting at the dog to start with?
It seems like they are leaving something out. Either that, or whoever was shooting at the dog really had no reason what-so-ever to be shooting at the dog.
11/23/07: Bullet Meant For Dog Kills Owner - Louisville News Story - WLKY Louisville (http://www.wlky.com/news/14674336/detail.html - broken link)
Taken From Text:
Quote:
Indiana woman chasing her dog was fatally shot by a neighbor after the dog ran through the neighbor's property
|
Who in the world would shoot a dog for just running
through their property?!
Is it just me, or does that seem a bit ridiculous? I could see shooting the dog if it was running
at you about to attack you, but from what the story says, it was
nothing like that.
Quote:
Officers arrested Linda Lindauer on preliminary charges of involuntary manslaughter and reckless homicide in Stroud's death.
|
I hope she gets the max sentence!
This is such a sad story!
In my opinion, she shouldn't have been shooting at the dog to start with. If she wasn't outside shooting at a dog that she really had no reason to be shooting at, none of this would have happened!