Quote:
Originally Posted by k9coach
I have a question about this. If my dogs have taken rimadyl in the past and seemingly done fine on it, should that indicate to me that they will probably never have an adverse reaction to the drug? After I became aware of all of the health issues and deaths caused by rimadyl, I have requested other drugs every time pain management was required, even though my dogs did fine on rimadyl in the past. I guess what I'm asking is have there been dogs that did well on rimadyl and then later when the drug was given again there were major problems? Also, what alternative for pain management do you recommend? Any thoughts on Tramadol? (The only times my dogs have needed pain management has been after surgeries. So far none of them require a long term pain management med. If there is a different pill you recommend for that though I'd be interested to hear about that as well.)
|
K9coach - Rimadyl seems to do a number on seniors and Labradors. It is my understanding that Rimadyl/Carprofen is given for most soft tissue injuries and surgeries. I did not ask my old vet if my girls had, had it in the past such as when I had them spayed, however, since it is what most vets grab for first, it is possible.
I do know that
Happy had taken it a couple of years before for a soft tissue surgery she had and she had zero problems. She was probably 10ish. However, when she started having hip issues (about 12ish) that is the medicine that did her in. (I know 10ish is still considered a senior...)
Tara, on the other hand had used it for two ACL surgeries and did just fine, seven and nine years old. Then at 12, she went in for a "sprang shoulder" and was prescribed Carprofen. That was on a Friday...by Sunday, she was showing signs of Rimadyl sickness and I stopped her meds immediately. I called the vet, they prescribed another medication but it was for her symptoms...it did not help. Over the next three weeks, she visited another vet and was put on a bland diet (which she ate at first, then she could not hold it down. When she was still eating, she had the doggy trots so bad, she could barely get out of the door and then she started having accidents in the house (thank God for carpet shampooer's!) Her's hips gave out and I had to assist her. When she could not get up out of her own mess, I new it was time to help her across the bridge, my heart was breaking.
![Crying](https://pics3.city-data.com/forum/images/smilies/sad4.gif)
I felt so much guilt from not being her advocate, it still hurts.
Diesel, recently had a soft tissue surgery and even though I have a standing order for NO Rimadyl / Carprofen, I still had to remind my vet. We went with
Tramodal and he did great. No side effects for Diesel! (Yay!)
As for using another anti-inflamatory, I would discuss what is available with your vet. I would ask what are the pros and cons. Your pet can't speak, you can. You are your pets greatest advocate. Don't just "trust" blindly. ASK questions!!! I only wish I had and needed too.
Chiroptera - agreed there were "other meds" and you know from the link as much as I do (other meds - no idea what they were.) However, there must have been enough evidence to show that Pfizer was negligent.
After
Tara got sick, I started looking up EVERYTHING on Rimadyl and Carprofen. I found even on Pfizer's website
https://www.rimadyl.com/default.aspx at the bottom
"Important Safety Information" it lists the side effects, including
possible death.
Is this story from 7News "sensationalised news story that is jumping on Rimadyl?" Personally, I don't think enough has been said about what Rimadyl can do. The guy that won the suit is using the money to give back to other pet-parents making them aware of what can happen.
I suppose something that does concern me is that when I am standing in the vets office and they are giving me a medication for my dog (or cat) they explain the pros and cons. I assumed (big mistake) that the vet was there for the betterment of my dogs health.
Had I known the "possible" effects, I would have never given either dog Rimadyl...it would have been my choice. Instead, I blindly took the medicine and gave it to my dogs, causing horrible effects (not every dog has them...) but mine did.
I suppose this story just reminded me of "MY" past mistakes, that I NEVER want to repeat...and like the guy that did the suit, I just want people to be
aware of what can happen. I am so glad it does not effect every animal like it did mine.
One more note, I found a website (I'll have to see if I can find it again
The Senior Dogs Project ) that explained, if you have blood tests (liver and kidney) done
before starting Rimadyl / Carprofen (and the tests are within limits) if something happens (Rimadyl sickness) and then you have the tests re-done (showing problems)...and the animal dies, you will have better case against Pfizer.
This is NOT the first time Pfizer has paid out on a suit for Rimadyl.
Sorry so long, just wanted to address questions and share my experience...
The Senior Dogs Project