Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A study led by Suzanna Judd, a nutritional epidemiologist at the University of Alabama, found that people who ate Southern food six times per week had about a 41 percent higher risk of stroke, compared with people who just ate Southern food once per month.[5]
The study, conducted by a team of researchers led by Suzanna Judd, a nutritional epidemiologist at the University of Alabama, is the first large-scale effort to look at how a diet of fried chicken, bacon, ham and sweet teas can raise the possibility of stroke. Judd and colleagues medically assessed 20,000 patients aged 45 and older. The patients then took surveys and answered questions about their eating habits and health in 2003 and 2007. Although people who ate traditional Southern diets lived across the U.S., about two-thirds of those involved in the study were located in the southeastern portion of the U.S.
Not every Southerner eats fried foods everyday, nor do we all cook like Paula Deen. And "organ meats" are just nasty IMO, most younger people won't eat that.
As for sweet tea, on a sweetness scale of 0-10 (zero being totally unsweet), I make mine about a 3.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynAragon
I've lived most of my life in the American south, and rarely eat fried foods, organ meats, "gizzards" - or tea sweetened with sugar.
Yeah that's all well and good, but the article isn't talking about you. It isn't talking about "true" southerners, or "all" southerners. It isn't even really talking about southerners, exclusively. It's talking about the variety of foods known to fall into the category of "southern foods," and the risk of eating lots of it.
IF YOU ARE - someone who eats lots of these foods, then you will be at risk of stroke.
IF YOU ARE NOT - someone who eats lots of these foods, then the article doesn't apply to you.
Yeah that's all well and good, but the article isn't talking about you. It isn't talking about "true" southerners, or "all" southerners. It isn't even really talking about southerners, exclusively. It's talking about the variety of foods known to fall into the category of "southern foods," and the risk of eating lots of it.
IF YOU ARE - someone who eats lots of these foods, then you will be at risk of stroke.
IF YOU ARE NOT - someone who eats lots of these foods, then the article doesn't apply to you.
Both of the quotes are presenting exceptions/challenges to the absolute rule, so they aren't examples of the "no true scotsman" fallacy. Those who respond to a challenge by modifying the subject would actually be committing the fallacy.
Here's the form, to clarify:
1. Absolute rule: All southerners eat P.
2. Challenge: Q is a southerner but does not eat P.
3. Fallacy (informal): All true southerners eat P.
That's strange because I considered Colorado to be among the leanest. Do you think findings like the ones below are misrepresentative?
Just posting my personal observations.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.