Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-23-2013, 09:50 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,472,244 times
Reputation: 7586

Advertisements

Does Microsoft have ADD and amnesia or what?

So in the beginning, there was Hotmail. Then they started issuing @msn.com addresses, but it was still Hotmail. Then they rebranded it as live.com and started issuing @live.com accounts, but it was still basically Hotmail. Now they're rebranding it to Outlook.com and issuing @outlook.com accounts. Pointing your browser to Sign In redirects to login.live.com, and ultimately calls itself Outlook. But it has nothing to do with the desktop Outlook application or Outlook Web Access.

I helped my first Windows Phone 7.x user the other day. It was connected to an Exchange Server from work and to a live.com account. I poked around in the phone, found the email accounts, including his live.com account, which sycs with m.hotmail.com or something like that. But the home screen tile is called Hotmail.

Then we log into the @live.com account on the web and it has the old Hotmail/MSN/Live look. Until I went into the contacts, then it sort of took on the flat Win8/Outlook.com look.

At least the Outlook tile was where his Exchange account was accessed, which matches the fact that he's using Outlook (the desktop app) to access the Exchange account on the PC.

So Hotmail is Outlook, but not that Outlook. Outlook.com can be accessed from Hotmail.com. If you login to live.com, then go to msn.com, it'll show you logged in. Clicking "Windows Live Home" takes you to your Outlook.com inbox. Going to outlook.com takes you to mail.live.com and your inbox, which could be a hotmail, msn, live, or outlook address. Signing out of Outlook.com takes you to MSN.com.

Imagine trying to explain this to someone who doesn't really grasp the Internet or email. Is Microsoft intentionally trying to confuse people?

Oh yeah, there's also MSN Explorer which another desktop app that seems to do everything Internet Explorer does, but with more fluff. And some people still insist on using it for no apparent reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2013, 05:54 AM
 
10,926 posts, read 22,017,615 times
Reputation: 10569
Personally I think MS should have just called them all...

Bob
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 06:31 PM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,734,592 times
Reputation: 37906
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHDave View Post
Personally I think MS should have just called them all...

Bob
At least they would have been right twice a day... 8:08
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2013, 01:07 AM
 
Location: West Los Angeles and Rancho Palos Verdes
13,584 posts, read 15,682,331 times
Reputation: 14050
This is what happens when you replace legitimate thinkers with cheap H-1B labor...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2013, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Metro Washington DC
15,436 posts, read 25,843,493 times
Reputation: 10460
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
So Hotmail is Outlook, but not that Outlook. Outlook.com can be accessed from Hotmail.com. If you login to live.com, then go to msn.com, it'll show you logged in. Clicking "Windows Live Home" takes you to your Outlook.com inbox. Going to outlook.com takes you to mail.live.com and your inbox, which could be a hotmail, msn, live, or outlook address. Signing out of Outlook.com takes you to MSN.com. .
I have a headache.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2013, 07:29 AM
 
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
16,556 posts, read 19,734,014 times
Reputation: 13341
I think it's because they are in such a hurry to get everything out the door, and not get left behind, everything comes out half baked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2013, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Bolton, CT
200 posts, read 241,659 times
Reputation: 113
This is pretty funny and so true. I've never understood why Windows went from 1, 2, 3 to 95, 98, Me, XP to Vista then back to 7 and now 8. And that's just the consumer side! I mean, I know "why", but I don't understand how that was ever thought to be a good idea.

Apple is certainly not innocent here either. Where did I manage (before the current wireless method) my iPhone/iPad software and settings for some time? Where can I buy/rent movies or subscribe to podcasts? All in something called "iTunes". :/ And still, where are the apps for iPad/iPod/iPhone managed/backed up (if not iCloud)? iTunes. Where are the apps for my Mac managed? App store. And lets not forget the .mac/iTools, MobileMe, iCloud debacle.

I believe they will have an issue with the "Apple TV" brand too if/when they do decide to actually market a TV (not just a box attached to one).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2013, 10:10 AM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,734,592 times
Reputation: 37906
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgorneau View Post
This is pretty funny and so true. I've never understood why Windows went from 1, 2, 3 to 95, 98, Me, XP to Vista then back to 7 and now 8. And that's just the consumer side! I mean, I know "why", but I don't understand how that was ever thought to be a good idea.

Apple is certainly not innocent here either. Where did I manage (before the current wireless method) my iPhone/iPad software and settings for some time? Where can I buy/rent movies or subscribe to podcasts? All in something called "iTunes". :/ And still, where are the apps for iPad/iPod/iPhone managed/backed up (if not iCloud)? iTunes. Where are the apps for my Mac managed? App store. And lets not forget the .mac/iTools, MobileMe, iCloud debacle.

I believe they will have an issue with the "Apple TV" brand too if/when they do decide to actually market a TV (not just a box attached to one).
True. Shouldn't Windows 7 actually have been Windows 9?

1, 2, 3, 95 (4), 98 (5), Me (6), XP (7), Vista (8)

Of course it could be higher I suppose. We're leaving out the non-consumer versions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2013, 10:12 AM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,734,592 times
Reputation: 37906
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgorneau View Post
This is pretty funny and so true. I've never understood why Windows went from 1, 2, 3 to 95, 98, Me, XP to Vista then back to 7 and now 8. And that's just the consumer side! I mean, I know "why", but I don't understand how that was ever thought to be a good idea.

Apple is certainly not innocent here either. Where did I manage (before the current wireless method) my iPhone/iPad software and settings for some time? Where can I buy/rent movies or subscribe to podcasts? All in something called "iTunes". :/ And still, where are the apps for iPad/iPod/iPhone managed/backed up (if not iCloud)? iTunes. Where are the apps for my Mac managed? App store. And lets not forget the .mac/iTools, MobileMe, iCloud debacle.

I believe they will have an issue with the "Apple TV" brand too if/when they do decide to actually market a TV (not just a box attached to one).
iChiuaua!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2013, 03:04 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,472,244 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tek_Freek View Post
True. Shouldn't Windows 7 actually have been Windows 9?

1, 2, 3, 95 (4), 98 (5), Me (6), XP (7), Vista (8)

Of course it could be higher I suppose. We're leaving out the non-consumer versions.
Yeah there's pretty much no math that makes Windows 7 the 7th version of Windows. Its actually NT 6.1 but since Vista was NT 6.0, I guess they wanted to give the impression that it was more different from Vista than it really is. Of course no one outside of tech circles knows the true version number so who cares if its 6.1 or 7. Then Windows 8 is really NT 6.2, showing how closely related Vista/7/8 are.

I think a lot of the naming issues comes from changing regimes and short attention spans within Microsoft. I prefer simple version numbers since its always easy to tell which is later and how closely related two products are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top