Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > College Football
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-28-2016, 05:51 PM
 
Location: The Dirty South.
1,624 posts, read 2,039,990 times
Reputation: 1241

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoPro View Post
Wonder what happened to A&M's bragging about "we run this state"?
A&M has the potential to be good for a long time in sec. But its not with Kevin Sumlin. They need a better coach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2016, 06:22 PM
 
Location: OKIE-Ville
5,546 posts, read 9,513,111 times
Reputation: 3309
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoPro View Post
Wonder what happened to A&M's bragging about "we run this state"?
Yeh, I guess ya'll can still hang your hat on that last win the Horns put on 'em.

I do miss A&M though; they would make our conference a lot more respectable. I especially miss A&M's cheerleaders.............oh wait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2016, 07:00 PM
 
2,085 posts, read 2,143,374 times
Reputation: 3498
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bass&Catfish2008 View Post
Looks pretty accurate for Oklahoma. There might be a little more bleed over into Arkansas and North Texas as Oklahoma has typically been the most successful football program in the Southwest historically.

Also, in regards to Texas, UT, Oklahoma, and A&M own the Dallas market. Texas Christian has a contingent in Fort Worth, but there's still a ton of UT, OU, and A&M fans there too, not to mention Tech & Baylor and even Oklahoma State.

I agree with this...I always remembered A&M having a good deal more fans in the North Texas area, than UT did...it always seemed like UT was just supported because it was the generic Texas school that happened to be in Texas, but as far as die hard fans, I thing A&M wins that throughout much of the state...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2016, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
12,950 posts, read 13,358,198 times
Reputation: 14010
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfoe View Post
A&M has the potential to be good for a long time in sec. But its not with Kevin Sumlin. They need a better coach.
I agree with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2016, 03:03 PM
 
5,281 posts, read 6,219,958 times
Reputation: 3131
I thought the SC spread was pretty accurate. I say this because it reflects the UGA lean across the coast/Ga line pretty well. I was still surprised at how lopsided the USC-Clemson fandom was but I went to Clemson so I was probably oblivious to us being that much of a minority even though I knew USC commands a bigger swath of the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 04:16 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,385,085 times
Reputation: 11382
It's not accurate at all for my area in Dallas. It overstates the number of Texas fans. The actual number is less than half of what's indicated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 04:22 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,385,085 times
Reputation: 11382
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrpeatie View Post
I thought the SC spread was pretty accurate. I say this because it reflects the UGA lean across the coast/Ga line pretty well. I was still surprised at how lopsided the USC-Clemson fandom was but I went to Clemson so I was probably oblivious to us being that much of a minority even though I knew USC commands a bigger swath of the state.
Mr. Peatie, I grew up in Clemson, and by the time I finished high school I had met or heard of a total of one USC fan. I was shocked at what the map showed in South Carolina. However, it's probably a function of the fact that people who aren't actually fans at all will default to the state's flagship university even if, as in South Carolina (is it true anywhere else?) the state's flagship university is academically and athletically inferior to the A&M school. In other words, it's a mile wide and an inch deep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,518 posts, read 33,572,975 times
Reputation: 12162
Quote:
Originally Posted by soletaire View Post
I agree with this...I always remembered A&M having a good deal more fans in the North Texas area, than UT did...it always seemed like UT was just supported because it was the generic Texas school that happened to be in Texas, but as far as die hard fans, I thing A&M wins that throughout much of the state...
Texas will probably always have more fans. But they will also have more fairweather fans as well. It's easily the states best football and sports program historically. No school is really close. Texas A&M does better than Texas slightly in East Texas. Texas Tech makes some ground obviously in West Texas. But Texas is 1st or 2nd throughout most of the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2016, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas, NV
455 posts, read 652,613 times
Reputation: 528
South Carolina's fan base has certainly benefitted from the SEC "me too" effect over the past few decades, but I believe the map overstates the case. When I graduated high school in the mid-70's from the Charleston area and moved on to college at Clemson, there were at least as many Tiger fans in the Lowcountry as Gamecock fans. Throughout the 80's, with a national championship and perennial top ten finishes, this only increased. SC finally found some success for a few years under Spurrier and that certainly grew their base, it will be interesting to see if Muschamp can build on that legacy...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 07:23 PM
 
2,309 posts, read 3,853,583 times
Reputation: 2250
Very accurate for South Carolina. Clemson is a very niche program. Isolated geographically to the upstate of SC. Clemson like Wake Forest is not even a statewide brand let alone a regional or national brand. Thus your comparatively lower ratings for this year's final four playoffs compared to last years when you had schools with national followings.

But don't tell the Clemson faithful any of this. Clemson's faithful believe that anything beyond the upstate of SC is the wastelands.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > College Football

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top