Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
WHAT I'M CURIOUS TO KNOW IS :WHAT CITIES DO SOME OF YOU THINK "OUTWEIGH" IN THE SIZE OF THEIR SKYLINES RATHER THAN THEIR ACTUAL IMPORTANCE?iN OTHER WORDS ALL GLITZ BUT NO REAL SUBSTANCE?
None that I can think of (but I can think of some examples the other way around). Even for the cities that boomed earlier in their history and aren't quite as important now as they were then, their skylines still seem to reflect their size/importance pretty accurately. I think that's mainly because a lot of the cities that had a later economic growth spurt went on to build skylines to reflect their growing importance. But you can usually tell by the architecture of the skylines when the city peaked in importance.
LA would no doubt be numero uno. But Atlantais second by a mile. It is so spread out it doesn't show just how many skyscrappers it has in just one photo. Atlanta has like 5 skylines .
(sigh) I think only about 10% of Americans know how to spell "Cincinnati" correctly.
So I added an extra "t" by mistake.We all cannot be robots.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
