Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-11-2024, 10:38 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,788 posts, read 9,644,430 times
Reputation: 7364

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Dallas gets the edge here, for me. Philadelphia has a better urban dense setting though between the two, and has the classic city feel. Dallas has a better skyline aesthetic, though.

Dallas does need a couple of new towers. Would love to see Dallas get another 800 or so footer, and a 1,000 foot tall+ tower. They are overdue.

San Antonio vs Orlando?
San Antonio. It is larger with better architecture.

Cincinnati, OH or Baltimore, MD?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-12-2024, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Belton, Tx
4,034 posts, read 2,342,077 times
Reputation: 1854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
San Antonio. It is larger with better architecture.

Cincinnati, OH or Baltimore, MD?
I like both but like Baltimore's a little more. Jacksonville FL or Tampa?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2024, 07:30 PM
 
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee
1,793 posts, read 1,971,611 times
Reputation: 1656
Quote:
Originally Posted by brock2010 View Post
I like both but like Baltimore's a little more. Jacksonville FL or Tampa?
Tampa by far, Taller Denser More Towers and just better



Oklahoma City or Albany, New York
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2024, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,273 posts, read 14,760,933 times
Reputation: 11614
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueRedTide View Post
Tampa by far, Taller Denser More Towers and just better



Oklahoma City or Albany, New York
Even though I really dislike how the 800 foot Devon Tower sticks out oddly on the Oklahoma City skyline, Oklahoma City's density and number of buildings is better than Albany's.

Oklahoma City takes it.

Omaha, NE vs Richmond, VA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2024, 01:47 PM
 
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee
1,793 posts, read 1,971,611 times
Reputation: 1656
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Even though I really dislike how the 800 foot Devon Tower sticks out oddly on the Oklahoma City skyline, Oklahoma City's density and number of buildings is better than Albany's.

Oklahoma City takes it.

Omaha, NE vs Richmond, VA?
I agree Albany is a fine city but that's one fugly skyline lol



Richmond takes it. Much More Denser Looks Newer Far Better Architecture. Richmond looks like a 1.6 million metro skyline (even tho it isn't) Omaha looks like a 800,000 person skyline


Richmond Virginia, or Hartford Connecticut
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2024, 11:15 PM
 
Location: Belton, Tx
4,034 posts, read 2,342,077 times
Reputation: 1854
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueRedTide View Post
I agree Albany is a fine city but that's one fugly skyline lol



Richmond takes it. Much More Denser Looks Newer Far Better Architecture. Richmond looks like a 1.6 million metro skyline (even tho it isn't) Omaha looks like a 800,000 person skyline


Richmond Virginia, or Hartford Connecticut
I like Richmond's better. Buildings look taller. Midland TX or Mobile AL?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2024, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee
1,793 posts, read 1,971,611 times
Reputation: 1656
Quote:
Originally Posted by brock2010 View Post
I like Richmond's better. Buildings look taller. Midland TX or Mobile AL?
I agree Richmond may be taller, but I just started looking at Hartfords skyline recently and much better than I thought. I think people been sleeping on Hartford's skyline, it's quite nice





Mobile Alabama. One word, well actually two SIGNATURE ARCHITECTURE. This one Was Pretty Close Midland Actually is Denser with Less Gaps and I was about to award the contest to Midland. But Mobile's Chief Building looks like a mini Chrysler Building and has a couple of other really nice architectural pieces, Mobile is Taller and mixed in with the River and Bridge backdrop, Mobile wins Midland Has no building with that WOW factor. and lacks a river and is surrounded by flat land on all sides. That being said, If Mobile didn't have those 2 or 3 signature buildings Midland would Win as it's No Slouch and has a wonderful skyline for its size


Midland Texas or Stockton California
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2024, 10:20 PM
 
Location: Land of Ill Noise
3,560 posts, read 3,504,509 times
Reputation: 2280
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueRedTide View Post
I agree Richmond may be taller, but I just started looking at Hartfords skyline recently and much better than I thought. I think people been sleeping on Hartford's skyline, it's quite nice





Mobile Alabama. One word, well actually two SIGNATURE ARCHITECTURE. This one Was Pretty Close Midland Actually is Denser with Less Gaps and I was about to award the contest to Midland. But Mobile's Chief Building looks like a mini Chrysler Building and has a couple of other really nice architectural pieces, Mobile is Taller and mixed in with the River and Bridge backdrop, Mobile wins Midland Has no building with that WOW factor. and lacks a river and is surrounded by flat land on all sides. That being said, If Mobile didn't have those 2 or 3 signature buildings Midland would Win as it's No Slouch and has a wonderful skyline for its size


Midland Texas or Stockton California
I will say, I'm very surprised how much i liked Midland's skyline! I liked its mix of old and new buildings, and that it felt a little more dense(per pics) in its core than Stockton. Plus it's tallest building is taller, so I'll go with Midland.

Baton Rouge, LA, or Corpus Christi, TX?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2024, 11:01 PM
 
Location: Belton, Tx
4,034 posts, read 2,342,077 times
Reputation: 1854
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonySegaTendo617 View Post
I will say, I'm very surprised how much i liked Midland's skyline! I liked its mix of old and new buildings, and that it felt a little more dense(per pics) in its core than Stockton. Plus it's tallest building is taller, so I'll go with Midland.

Baton Rouge, LA, or Corpus Christi, TX?
Corpus Christi. It's 3 tallest buildings alone are gorgeous in my opinion. Stamford CT or Springfield MA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2024, 07:08 AM
 
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee
1,793 posts, read 1,971,611 times
Reputation: 1656
Quote:
Originally Posted by brock2010 View Post
Corpus Christi. It's 3 tallest buildings alone are gorgeous in my opinion. Stamford CT or Springfield MA?
Stamford Connecticut. More Expansive and Immersive, Denser and Prettier


Speaking of Gorgeous Buildings, Both of these Cities have a few
Mobile Alabama or Corpus Christi Texas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top