Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: It's worth the cost!
Boston 9 30.00%
DC 5 16.67%
New York 12 40.00%
San Diego 4 13.33%
San Francisco 8 26.67%
Seattle 6 20.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-26-2013, 11:57 PM
 
214 posts, read 410,817 times
Reputation: 129

Advertisements

Based on the following criteria, which city provides the best dollar value?
- outdoor amenities
- cultural offerings
- public transportation
- residential space
- arts/entertainment
- QOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2013, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Nashville/Memphis
367 posts, read 997,750 times
Reputation: 330
Where's Chicago?...its a reletively affordable expensive city
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2013, 07:28 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,192,238 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveTime View Post
Where's Chicago?...its a reletively affordable expensive city
I don't know that I'd call Chicago an affordable expensive city.......but I think I know what you mean. For me, Chicago gives the best bang for the buck. Many of its urban neighborhoods are downright cheap compared to other major/urban cities in America. What you get for your dollar in Chicago is tremendous. I dare say that urban neighborhoods in Chicago cost 33 cents on the dollar or less to comparable NYC/SF hoods. When was the last time you saw a decent (and decent sized) $250K urban condo in either of those two cities?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2013, 08:28 AM
 
214 posts, read 410,817 times
Reputation: 129
Chicago and Philadelphia are so affordable for the most point that rarely they are mistaken for expensive places in comparison with the aforementioned cities. Even LA, albeit glitzy on the outside, offers much more dollar value than San Francisco and San Diego.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2013, 08:47 AM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 11 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,489 posts, read 44,146,303 times
Reputation: 16887
I voted DC...more free entertainment there than in the others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2013, 08:18 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,541,157 times
Reputation: 5884
I am not sure Chicago cracks the expensive cities list. I think you'd have to go through LA and Miami before you got there. I voted for Boston, SF and NYC as worth the cost. I think DC is a little overpriced for what it is, but would be next in line. 5 years ago I would have put DC up there though but real estate looks to be getting out of hand there. I think its possible for DC to become the 2nd most expensive city in the U.S.

^ A lot of the museum's in NYC are "suggested" amount.. You don't actually have to pay that. i.e. you can pay a dollar for a normal 25.00 entry fee...tourists don't know any better and pay the suggested amounts. I mean, of course if you have the money to blow, it is cool to pay the full price, but somebody like a student or not working some high end job shouldn't feel bad whatsoever of paying what they can afford to experience what is supposed to be free access to the public anyway and non commercial.

Last edited by grapico; 01-27-2013 at 08:37 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2013, 08:37 PM
 
214 posts, read 410,817 times
Reputation: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
I am not sure Chicago cracks the expensive cities list. I think you'd have to go through LA and Miami before you got there. I voted for Boston, SF and NYC as worth the cost. I think DC is a little overpriced for what it is, but would be next in line. 5 years ago I would have put DC up there though but real estate looks to be getting out of hand there. I think its possible for DC to become the 2nd most expensive city in the U.S.
Your assessment exactly where I was headed. I was hesitant to put LA in the fray because you can get so much "house" in several neighborhoods in comparison to other places. With regards to Miami, the housing market provided so much opportunity for regular people to get steals in residential property. *If you take $500k, your house will look so much different in the places on the list vs other major cities like Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Houston, LA, Miami, and Philadelphia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2013, 08:39 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,541,157 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Milehigh View Post
Your assessment exactly where I was headed. I was hesitant to put LA in the fray because you can get so much "house" in several neighborhoods in comparison to other places. With regards to Miami, the housing market provided so much opportunity for regular people to get steals in residential property. *If you take $500k, your house will look so much different in the places on the list vs other major cities like Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Houston, LA, Miami, and Philadelphia.
calculating square feet is definitely the way to go about it also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2013, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,995,933 times
Reputation: 4328
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Milehigh View Post
Your assessment exactly where I was headed. I was hesitant to put LA in the fray because you can get so much "house" in several neighborhoods in comparison to other places.
Like where? A detached 2BR, 1.5 bath is over $1,000,000 in Santa Monica. 3BR, 2BA detached and maybe 1,400 square feet is at least $700,000 anywhere with a good school district.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2013, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,952,341 times
Reputation: 8365
IMO, only NYC and maybe San Francisco are worth the cost but it is very close. Boston is next, with it being a little overpriced imo. DC is completely overpriced imo. Seattle and San Diego seem cheaper than those four but they also offer tons in the way of natural scenery, surroundings, safety. I'd say Seattle and San Diego are just a little overpriced for what they offer.

LA, Chicago and especially Philadelphia give you the most value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top