Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The City that I think should be growing faster out of the bunch is Chicago because consistantly it has been losing population by the decade which is crazy.Atlanta is a city that is at a stand still around 400,000 people for the past 20 yrs and Dallas being at a million for 20yrs as well doesn't make any sense to me.
San Antonio is a city that has surpass Dallas city population but the metro as a whole isn't growing as fast as I think it should.Chicago really needs to make a push or a city in south with be claiming that
#3 spot and that is Houston.
The City that I think should be growing faster out of the bunch is Chicago because consistantly it has been losing population by the decade which is crazy.Atlanta is a city that is at a stand still around 400,000 people for the past 20 yrs and Dallas being at a million for 20yrs as well doesn't make any sense to me.
San Antonio is a city that has surpass Dallas city population but the metro as a whole isn't growing as fast as I think it should.Chicago really needs to make a push or a city in south with be claiming that
#3 spot and that is Houston.
This is not true...looks like we have another misguided thread gearing up.
I guess you aren't aware that city limits population is hardly ever considered to be a valid statistic, especially not when discussing comparisons.
The City that I think should be growing faster out of the bunch is Chicago because consistantly it has been losing population by the decade which is crazy.
The City that I think should be growing faster out of the bunch is Chicago because consistantly it has been losing population by the decade which is crazy.Atlanta is a city that is at a stand still around 400,000 people for the past 20 yrs and Dallas being at a million for 20yrs as well doesn't make any sense to me.
San Antonio is a city that has surpass Dallas city population but the metro as a whole isn't growing as fast as I think it should.Chicago really needs to make a push or a city in south with be claiming that
#3 spot and that is Houston.
We'll see. Lucky for Chicago is that its economy has diversified so it can hold on well if it loses population.
But since so many people are moving to Texas It's surprising that Dallas grew by so little in the past 10 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maintainschaos
Chicago gained population in the 2000 census.
I would like to see a map of areas where data was not received for the 1990, 2000, and 2010 census' for Chicago.
Atlanta is not able to annex because of all the other cities and towns that have locked it in.....City limits is not a good place to look in this case. The metro is growing fast enough...Think the cities you listed are growing well...
Atlanta is not able to annex because of all the other cities and towns that have locked it in.....City limits is not a good place to look in this case. The metro is growing fast enough...Think the cities you listed are growing well...
Atlanta will only be in the picture as far as the metro growth but staying at 400,000 people in Atlanta city limits along is Ludacris.All those trees that are standing up in the Atl city limits could be build infrastruture of homes/condos so don't make excuses for Atlanta.A city called Spring and Woodlands out side of Houston are about 1/2 sq mi and each city along have around 60,000 so yes if Atlanta want to populate more it could don't blame on the burbs or metro.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.