Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: which of these 2 is more "flyover"?
midwest 46 56.79%
south 35 43.21%
Voters: 81. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2012, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,211,676 times
Reputation: 37337

Advertisements

all I would ask is that as you flyover us, just every so often, give us a little wave and wait until you hit Wisconnie to flush the toilet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2012, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis
1,704 posts, read 3,459,056 times
Reputation: 2393
I consider the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans to be the only true flyover country. As far as I know, pilots are even encouraged never to land there! Talk about "no international tourist destinations!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2012, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Canada
4,868 posts, read 10,566,044 times
Reputation: 5516
The South is perceived to be a vibrant, unique culture and people from other countries do want to visit it over the Midwest which is not perceived as a very interesting place to go. Savannah, Charleston, New Orleans are all famous. Houston and Atlanta are not that well known despite their sizes and people don't know what would be interesting to go see there. I say this as someone from outside the United States who has talked about these issues with people from many countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2012, 12:10 PM
 
Location: M I N N E S O T A
14,773 posts, read 21,575,601 times
Reputation: 9263
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliSon View Post
How have I been proven wrong? When tourists come to the U.S. there are only a handful of cities they want to visit imo, NYC, LA, SF, MIA, and Orlando the rest fight it out for scraps but even then cities like Boston, SD, Las Vegas get most of that
because both regions do have international tourist destinations. Midwest main city is Chicago. The South (excluding Florida) main city is New Orleans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2012, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Chicago =)
410 posts, read 637,386 times
Reputation: 362
Neither. The world is flyover country for America
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2012, 04:30 PM
 
2,076 posts, read 3,679,966 times
Reputation: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIMBAM View Post
The South is perceived to be a vibrant, unique culture and people from other countries do want to visit it over the Midwest which is not perceived as a very interesting place to go. Savannah, Charleston, New Orleans are all famous. Houston and Atlanta are not that well known despite their sizes and people don't know what would be interesting to go see there. I say this as someone from outside the United States who has talked about these issues with people from many countries.
atlanta is well known. houston should be better known based on her size. but it does seem the south has more attractions than the midwest. i mean, i know many midwesterners who go to the south just for vacation. while other than chicago, people from the south only come to the midwest to see family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2012, 08:53 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis
1,704 posts, read 3,459,056 times
Reputation: 2393
St. Louis, Mount Rushmore, and the Great Lakes coast would beg to differ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2012, 11:08 PM
 
640 posts, read 1,230,817 times
Reputation: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by S.D. Calif View Post
This number is highly contingent on the definition of the South.
You can't just take out certain states from the population of the South just because you want to...the South is the South is the South...get over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2012, 11:18 PM
 
6,143 posts, read 7,578,444 times
Reputation: 6617
Quote:
Originally Posted by steel03 View Post
St. Louis, Mount Rushmore, and the Great Lakes coast would beg to differ.
I see many foreign tourists at Rushmore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 12:00 AM
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
3,565 posts, read 8,015,830 times
Reputation: 2605
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliSon View Post
Excluding Florida, what the title says
Listen to this song and tally up how many of each Midwestern and Southern states are mentioned, then you'll have your answer.


Jason Aldean - Fly Over States - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top