Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2012, 10:55 AM
 
Location: London, U.K.
886 posts, read 1,563,745 times
Reputation: 828

Advertisements

Chicago may be growing again according to the link by the OP. It shows Cook county growing By 22k which declined in the 2000's because of Chicago. Also seems Miami is growing faster now than even the 2000s decade
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2012, 10:55 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
If the definitions don't change that much, DC MSA is poised to pass Philly MSA sometime this decade if the DC growth continues. 120,000 for DC is pretty impressive. DFW and Houston keeps on keepin on.

Think it will be close; to me the DC growth rate is far less sustainable than the others (large % growers) as it has been fueled on govt expansion susbsidy to grow the job base; will see after the election how the impacts are to DC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 12:10 PM
 
3,709 posts, read 5,985,671 times
Reputation: 3038
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLAXTOR121 View Post
This report isn't for "within" a year. It's for 15 months after the census was taken in 2010. This is the census report for growth between April 2010 and July 2011. For Atlanta as an example take that 90k and divide by 15, which is the number of months measuring growth (April 1, 2010- July 1, 2011) then multiply by 12 the number of months in a year and that's how much your metro is growing by a year. Atlantas growth is 72k in a year according to the census that's a 28% slowdown from the decade earlier
Good catch. All the better that Atlanta's growth has slowed down that much more. I'd much rather see our job growth kick up a notch than our population growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 12:16 PM
 
Location: MIA/DC
1,190 posts, read 2,252,781 times
Reputation: 699
By next census with todays trends

MIA
6,408,555
U.S. rank 7

DC
6,557,458
U.S. rank 6
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
I think people are placing too much weight on these.

This is just an estimate.

As we saw with the 2010 official counts these estimates can be wildly off.

Most Cities were estimated to have hundreds of thousands of people more than they actually had.

The estimates last decade showed that DFW, ATL, Las Vegas and Phoenix were gaining more people than Houston, when in fact Houston gained more than all of these.

The estimates were a good guide but it has major flaws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 01:57 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
686 posts, read 1,167,565 times
Reputation: 675
I keep asking, but what about the 2010 Census challenges?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 02:26 PM
 
Location: The Greatest city on Earth: City of Atlanta Proper
8,485 posts, read 14,994,819 times
Reputation: 7333
Quote:
Originally Posted by HouTXmetro View Post
I keep asking, but what about the 2010 Census challenges?
They won't be considered until next year some time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 03:22 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,655 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
After last year's census, I think these overly optimistic estimates are odd.

The Bay Area grew by 95,000 last year? Yeah right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Indianapolis
3,892 posts, read 5,512,078 times
Reputation: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
After last year's census, I think these overly optimistic estimates are odd.

The Bay Area grew by 95,000 last year? Yeah right.
Heck they underestimated Indiana's population in 2009.
the Census also overestimated Atlantas population by 10%
Really ill believe it when the 10 year census comes out.
Lets see if the Census can follow the trend here.
Indiana has 6.5M people i predict with the patter of growth we have been having to hit 7M by 2020 or more than 7M
Lets see the estimates on that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Indianapolis
3,892 posts, read 5,512,078 times
Reputation: 957
lol @ Crook County Illinois growing.
i honestly dont believe the census gets it.
Even Chicagoans call it Crook County. so why in the world would i live in that high tax/messed up county?
Heck the suburban counties are way more desirable than Crook County so i bet Crook County is losing population well the suburbs are gaining population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top