Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2010, 08:38 PM
 
5,993 posts, read 13,240,593 times
Reputation: 4970

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcarlilesiu View Post
I have to disagree. Though Chicago did annex quite a few small municipalities, the assumption that the majority of people live in chicago and not in the surrounding metro area is false.

Chicago has a population of around 3 million where as the whole Chicagoland area is nearly 11 million.
2009 estimated population of the metro area is 9.8 million. The city proper is 2.85 million.

Look at this table.

Table of United States primary census statistical areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

All I was saying in many other metropolitan areas, the central city is a much smaller percentage compared to the rest of the metro area.

IE: San Fran is 700-800,000, while the Bay area is over 7 million in other words 1/10. The same goes for Boston and its metro area and D.C. and its metro area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2010, 08:58 AM
 
11,975 posts, read 31,975,592 times
Reputation: 4646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex?Il? View Post
IE: San Fran is 700-800,000, while the Bay area is over 7 million in other words 1/10. The same goes for Boston and its metro area and D.C. and its metro area.
Both of these examples are parts of coastal megalopolises. The Northeast is a unique case. It's simply the most populous area in the United States, and it's getting difficult to tell where the various MSAs and CSAs start and end. You could make the argument that it is one mult-nodal metro from Boston to D.C.--including New York, Newark, Philadelphia, and Baltimore. Sure, Chicagoland is creeping closer to Milwaukee each year, and we have NE Indiana, but we will never rival the population in the Northeast Corridor--even if we extend to Indianapolis and St. Louis (pretty much impossible given the geographic distances involved).

The Bay Area is also different from Chicago, because there are three major cities acting as one metro--SF, San Jose, and Oakland. I'm not sure where the individual MSAs and the whole CSA start and end, but it is definitely one metro area. And the Silicon Valley economic engine, along with truly separate (from SF) college towns like Berkley and Palo Alto, make this a really unique place in the U.S. It's a wonderful place to live if you can afford it and don't have earthquake trouble. San Francisco is certainly the "urban heart" of the region, but the more Palo Alto and gritty Oakland can't be dicounted too much as contributors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top