Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2008, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Tower Grove East, St. Louis, MO
12,063 posts, read 31,623,677 times
Reputation: 3799

Advertisements

I lived in Westmont until literally 30 days ago. If you'd ever read any of my posts you'd know that.

So the question is, if Westmont's property values aren't lower because of the poor quality of the schools, then why are they lower???? Whatever reason you give, it'd have to be a negative right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2008, 01:17 PM
 
7,331 posts, read 15,386,950 times
Reputation: 3800
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYrules View Post
I would have to second this person's question. Chicago drove IL into bankruptcy? UMMM I think its quite the other way around my friend. Almost all of the major employers and tax generators for the state are located in Chicago or Cook Cty. Farms (of which IL is mostly made up of) are real pretty and all, but don't generate hardly a darn dime for Blago's spending bills, so where do you think all that money comes from for our roads that are finally after 30 years being updated? You guessed it, that county that is breaking the bank in Springfield as you put it, you know the one where most people live; Cook Cty.

And yes, young folks are flooding into the city and inner ring burbs again, not only for stuff to do, but how about getting to work and not having to pour $80 every other day into their gas tanks?
Well, this accusation gets thrown around all the time: The idea of urban dwellers as leeches. Truth is, areas with a more concentrated population generally shoulder more of a tax burden than other areas. Things like roads are expensive. So are schools. Parks. Their cost doesn't change significantly whether 10 people pay for them or 100,000 people pay for them. (True, some of these things are maintained through municipal authorities, but many others receive state and federal funds.)

I'm just curious about actual data rather than opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top