Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2014, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,923,075 times
Reputation: 7419

Advertisements

^ The career driven ones, yes, but not all. There's many different types of people such as the ones with ultra high standards like your friend for every single thing and somehow thinks that she's owed something better than her in life because she has a degree from a real nice school, the ones who want to date a "project", etc. I wish your friend luck, because of her really high standards it may be harder for her to find someone she actually wants to be with long term. If she's not already in her 30s, I hope she realizes this for her own sake - unless she doesn't give a **** about "finding someone."

I think there is a balance though, that a lot of people kind of miss out on. In the end, I think a big part of life is about finding happiness. Just because you have $1 million doesn't mean you're going to be happy and just because you have a degree from Harvard with a 6 figure job doesn't mean you are the **** and an absolutely amazing person. You may be intelligent, but there's more to relationships than how smart you are and how much money you make. And in my opinion, if you base your relationship on stupid statistics like that, the more likely you are to end up unhappy. I totally get the "if he can take care of himself, then he can take care of me" thing, but things like "Oh, well he's 5'11", not 6'1", so no" (happened to me) in the realm of silliness are insane and to me is the mark of someone who doesn't feel as good about themselves as you may think. If I don't think I'm going to be happy with them, then all the money in the world and good looks can't change my denial of them. Been in bad relationships with women that tons of other guys wanted, and it's not worth it. If you are unhappy, you are unhappy. It doesn't usually matter the setting.

At the same time I have my standards too, like everyone else. You have to find a balance and simplicity though. I think that wanting someone who can take care of how they look is fine, but once you get into the things like "Well, he makes $5000/year less than me, so no" type of thing, then I think that's grounds for failure.

Last edited by marothisu; 02-12-2014 at 04:44 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2014, 06:16 PM
 
14 posts, read 16,894 times
Reputation: 31
Honestly, I don't think money should keep a girl happy. Obviously it helps, but if a girl doesn't like you when you're not spending money on her, then you gotta move on in my opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2014, 06:50 PM
 
421 posts, read 676,443 times
Reputation: 246
ONSs are much cheaper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 01:14 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
229 posts, read 469,062 times
Reputation: 246
You can have a great work ethic and accomplish many things in life and still not be intelligent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 05:43 AM
 
9,912 posts, read 9,590,000 times
Reputation: 10109
You could save some money by getting Ripple,, or do what Fred Sanford did and make Champibble - wine with Ripple, you'd have to have watched Sanford and Son on TV though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 09:49 AM
 
166 posts, read 259,861 times
Reputation: 302
If you have to ask you can't afford one buddy. Go out there and man the hell up and get a girlfriend. If she becomes too expensive for you then you end it and find another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 12:23 PM
 
896 posts, read 1,399,937 times
Reputation: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Very true and that gets lost in it for a lot of guys. If you don't already do this and want a "hot" girlfriend who is up on her fashion and what not, there's a 95% chance she'll want you to make an effort too. That's been my experience at least and you're absolutely right in saying that it may add to the costs. It may seem shallow, but more and more women in their 20s and 30s care about how men look and dress in this country. I thought my friend was joking once who said she could never date a guy who didn't have some awareness of this stuff and would literally not date someone if they wore tennis shoes as their normal shoes. Sad, but true.

Who are you guys dating. I could care less if a guy wears tennis shoes compared to other shoes. I mean really! Maybe this is why I can not catch the typical yuppie professional because I could care less about this stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 12:30 PM
 
4,059 posts, read 5,619,531 times
Reputation: 2892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
I think it's closer to $2000/month. The cost to maintain a boyfriend is like $1000/month.
You could maintain a boyfriend for less than that. After you've paid off the PS4, the ongoing expense of Hot Pockets wouldn't be so bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,923,075 times
Reputation: 7419
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephei2000 View Post
Who are you guys dating. I could care less if a guy wears tennis shoes compared to other shoes. I mean really! Maybe this is why I can not catch the typical yuppie professional because I could care less about this stuff.
To be fair, I don't like wearing tennis shoes as my normal shoes anyway. But I've only dated one woman who was truly like that. The others wouldn't raise a big fuss about it, but expect you to take care of yourself...at least where it appears that you do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
555 posts, read 804,387 times
Reputation: 1174
a
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
^ The career driven ones, yes, but not all. There's many different types of people such as the ones with ultra high standards like your friend for every single thing and somehow thinks that she's owed something better than her in life because she has a degree from a real nice school, the ones who want to date a "project", etc. I wish your friend luck, because of her really high standards it may be harder for her to find someone she actually wants to be with long term. If she's not already in her 30s, I hope she realizes this for her own sake - unless she doesn't give a **** about "finding someone."

I think there is a balance though, that a lot of people kind of miss out on. In the end, I think a big part of life is about finding happiness. Just because you have $1 million doesn't mean you're going to be happy and just because you have a degree from Harvard with a 6 figure job doesn't mean you are the **** and an absolutely amazing person. You may be intelligent, but there's more to relationships than how smart you are and how much money you make. And in my opinion, if you base your relationship on stupid statistics like that, the more likely you are to end up unhappy. I totally get the "if he can take care of himself, then he can take care of me" thing, but things like "Oh, well he's 5'11", not 6'1", so no" (happened to me) in the realm of silliness are insane and to me is the mark of someone who doesn't feel as good about themselves as you may think. If I don't think I'm going to be happy with them, then all the money in the world and good looks can't change my denial of them. Been in bad relationships with women that tons of other guys wanted, and it's not worth it. If you are unhappy, you are unhappy. It doesn't usually matter the setting.

At the same time I have my standards too, like everyone else. You have to find a balance and simplicity though. I think that wanting someone who can take care of how they look is fine, but once you get into the things like "Well, he makes $5000/year less than me, so no" type of thing, then I think that's grounds for failure.
Hilarious about the height. Crazy.

My friend wasn't happy her boyfriend made only 55k at the time. (Admittedly, that isn't much to go on in the Silicon Valley, but he had valuable stock options.) She couldn't respect him for that. I don't agree w/her on that. But, I gotta hand it to her for being honest with herself. She knows what she wants and what she doesn't want. Better for her to go after what she wants then try to fool herself that what her man makes doesn't matter. Because if she does that and ends up marrying that poor fellow, she'll just be unhappy, keep trying to change him, and they'll be unhappy.

BTW, both friends are now happily married -- to people who look an awful lot like their ex-boy/girlfriend.

So, I think it's fine if sugar mamas/daddies and trophy girl/boyfriends judge people by their looks and money. As long as people are upfront about their wishes with prospective dates, and don't hurt/mislead anyone/waste their time, what's the harm? They know what they want; they should go after it. And if that means only dating a man or woman who makes at least six figures, a man or woman who "takes care of herself," etc. then more power to them, I say. The rest of us can steer clear of them. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top