Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2012, 08:44 AM
 
38 posts, read 175,183 times
Reputation: 19

Advertisements

I'm not sure if I should get the ll bean boots with 200grams of thinsulate and goretex or the sorel 1964 waxed canvas with felt liner. Which is better for winter here in Chicago? Thank you..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2012, 08:50 AM
 
483 posts, read 847,107 times
Reputation: 503
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 09:04 AM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,832,436 times
Reputation: 18734
There are a whole lot of functional and style questions one ought to consider with either of those footware options. The Sorels are awesome for things like sitting at Solider Field during a January play off game but you will look like a backwoods freak anywhere else unless we have a blizzard. The LLBean stuff is similarly popular with people that actually do things like tote shotguns into the woods and blast away with pheasant but if you need to walk around all day the relatively old fashioned construction / lack of support are not kind to ones feet / legs / back walking on pavement or even actually out hiking on slipperly trails...

Given the fact it was over 60 yesterday and will likely be similarly far above normal I would not be in any hurry to blow nearly $200 on this kind of very specialized footwear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 09:51 AM
 
38 posts, read 175,183 times
Reputation: 19
Thanks but just cause it was in the 60s yesterday doesn't mean I don't need to get a pair of winter boots..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 09:57 AM
 
483 posts, read 847,107 times
Reputation: 503
Just cause you need a pair of winter boots doesn't mean you need to over-analyze the specs of said boots.

They're both fine and both probably overkill for your typical Chicago boot needs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 10:44 AM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,832,436 times
Reputation: 18734
They are overkill and sort of "fringe" in appearance. If you have been around the more fashionable parts of region you'll see there are a wide range of options that would work for both most office situations and various "normal" outdoor pursuits -- there simply are not many Chicagoans that spend a signficant part of their time on Saketchaun mine sites or Maine pheasant hunts...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 10:50 AM
 
38 posts, read 175,183 times
Reputation: 19
Sure..if you choose fashion over function..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 10:54 AM
 
14,796 posts, read 17,819,306 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by chet everett View Post
There are a whole lot of functional and style questions one ought to consider with either of those footware options. The Sorels are awesome for things like sitting at Solider Field during a January play off game but you will look like a backwoods freak anywhere else unless we have a blizzard. The LLBean stuff is similarly popular with people that actually do things like tote shotguns into the woods and blast away with pheasant but if you need to walk around all day the relatively old fashioned construction / lack of support are not kind to ones feet / legs / back walking on pavement or even actually out hiking on slipperly trails...

Given the fact it was over 60 yesterday and will likely be similarly far above normal I would not be in any hurry to blow nearly $200 on this kind of very specialized footwear.
I agree, if these boots are really $200, skip em. You don't need to spend more than $100 and can spend less quite easily.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 11:00 AM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,832,436 times
Reputation: 18734
Functional boots for the kind of conditions likely to be encountered in Chicago are available from a wide range of sources and can be made in ways that don't draw attention to them or their wearers.

Lots of people buy winter footwear at stores like REI or Lands End or Nordstroms that do an excellent job of keeping your feet warm / dry and resist salt stains while still having a very mainstream appearance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2012, 11:03 AM
 
968 posts, read 2,682,216 times
Reputation: 431
I've used Bean Snow Sneakers for the last 4 years .. they're perfect and not over-the-top Nanook of the North ... Insulated just enough and pretty snowproof .. and you don't necessarily need to swap them out once indoors ( your feet won't roast ..) ..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top