Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-22-2007, 09:49 PM
 
1 posts, read 10,622 times
Reputation: 17

Advertisements

Chicago spent money on police cameras to fight crime in certain neighborhoods. A camera was put at the beginning of my block at 66th and Emerald. On the morning of Aug. 22 my son's car was stolen from in front of our house no more than 25 feet from the police camera. His was the second car to be taken from the block in a matter of weeks. When making the report he informed the officer about the camera and stated that the crime must have been caught on tape. The officer told him he would put it in the report. Why do we have this high tech, costly equipment if it is not being utilized in a timely manner? Perhaps this is why thieves feel comfortable enough to steal cars right in front of the camera. I was happy when the camera was put up but its purpose in either catching perpetrators or deterring them seems to be negligible. Is there any way to access the camera archives online? Perhaps citizens can help reviewing tapes if there is a backlog? My son probably wont get his car back in the same shape as it was but right and wrong should fit in this equation somewhere.


If we can access google cameras at street level why not access police cameras?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2007, 12:56 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,265,595 times
Reputation: 29983
66th and Emerald... wow. I don't know how you carry on down there. I guess someone has to... Anyway, the only way I see you getting access to the contents of that tape is to get a lawyer and compel access via a subpoena. And by then, who knows, the contents may have been erased. Or, the camera may have been pointing in a different direction entirely. Have you contacted the officer assigned to the case for a progress report? It sounds like they're not taking the case very seriously, which sucks. But hey, that's the CPD for ya.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2007, 06:22 PM
 
Location: Chicago, Tri-Taylor
5,014 posts, read 9,474,025 times
Reputation: 3994
Looking at my neighborhood map, 66th and Emerald is the exact dead center of Englewood. Either this is a creative troll or this poor dude's realtor really steered him wrong!

If this isn't a troll, count your blessings that the cops even showed up at all. They tend to take more of a "hands off" approach in that area. I think you're pretty much SOL on getting the tapes. Unless you file a lawsuit, you can't issue a subpoena (and who would you sue since you don't know who did it?). And even if you did, the CPD would likely assert the law enforcement or investigative privilege. And records relating to law enforcement are exempt from the Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Advice -- Save the money on the lawyer and use the insurance proceeds to get an apartment in another part of the City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2007, 08:49 AM
 
8,425 posts, read 12,197,647 times
Reputation: 4882
Let's not be too elitist. Someone has to live at 66th & Emerald if there is housing stock there. It might be attractive to a person who feels he or she can handle the crime rate and the local hazards compared to the relative inexpensiveness of the housing stock. Maybe that area is close to a person's job, his kids' schools, relatives or a house of worship. Maybe that person inherited a house that his parents bought in the sixties. I am acquainted with people who live in Englewood but, sure, the poster could be a troll.

But the previous post had it right. You can't subpoena camera results without having a law suit in progress. A FOIA request is your best bet. I don't know what seeing the camera results will get you, though. And the police don't constantly monitor the cameras, they just view them when a crime has been committed in the area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2007, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Chicago, Tri-Taylor
5,014 posts, read 9,474,025 times
Reputation: 3994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
Let's not be too elitist. Someone has to live at 66th & Emerald if there is housing stock there.
That's a huge IF in that area. I think most of it is burned down or boarded up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2007, 08:45 AM
 
8,425 posts, read 12,197,647 times
Reputation: 4882
Check out the area on google's satellite pics. I bet there's some occupied housing still standing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top