Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't think the Cavalier name had as bad a reputation as GM thought. They were actually good little cars for the money, and very easy to work on.
Now for the Cobalt, yeah it was a dud. I don't know what it was about those, but they didn't hold up as well.
I wish Cavalier was still around as a new car. The name, I don't know, I think that was more the chattering masses.
If someone asks me what the overall best car I've owned have been regardless of manufacturer the two Cavaliers would likely be my answer. Having said that, except for the one that was totaled, each of the several Tauruses went to 250K (one now, actually a 2005 Sable, is at 200K).
I wish Cavalier was still around as a new car. The name, I don't know, I think that was more the chattering masses.
If someone asks me what the overall best car I've owned have been regardless of manufacturer the two Cavaliers would likely be my answer. Having said that, except for the one that was totaled, each of the several Tauruses went to 250K (one now, actually a 2005 Sable, is at 200K).
I had an 84 Buick Skyhawk with 2.0L and a 1994 Cavalier RS sedan. Liked the efficiency of the design for DIY maintenance and passenger/cargo for a vehicle this size. While critics downplayed the push rod 4 cylinders, one advantage was the torque came in at lower RPMs making for a smoother acceleration off the line.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.