Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2009, 05:23 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,361,589 times
Reputation: 2975

Advertisements

Far-flung suburbs should be cut off from city funding. You are free to live way out there, but why should we pay for roads, streetlights, sewage and all that just to reach a few people who choose to live in plastic homes that all look alike? The money goes a long way to meet real social services so why waste it patching potholes that will just be reopened by the next Hummer that thunders by?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2009, 05:29 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,476,314 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by krudmonk View Post
Far-flung suburbs should be cut off from city funding. You are free to live way out there, but why should we pay for roads, streetlights, sewage and all that just to reach a few people who choose to live in plastic homes that all look alike? The money goes a long way to meet real social services so why waste it patching potholes that will just be reopened by the next Hummer that thunders by?
Don't pretend that people living in suburbs don't pay property taxes. Are you under the illusion that a city like LA pays to pave the roads in Riverside?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 05:51 PM
 
3,292 posts, read 4,478,516 times
Reputation: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhcompy View Post
as a telecommuter, i can tell you that they can take away my suburbs when they pry them from my cold dead hands.

urban centers are no place to raise kids. limited park space(especially low on baseball diamonds and football fields), generally increased crime, generally poorer school conditions, and little to no backyards(depending on where you live). ill stick to suburbia where my kid can have some space to grow and get a good education, while i can have the space to sit on my patio and drink while my son plays in the backyard
Couple things here:

1. No one is kicking you out of your boring suburb. All they're saying is that people are moving out because it's unsustainable due to rising costs. Older streetcar suburbs will probably remain because the sustainability is far far higher. They really only built those on the east coast though, I haven't really seen any since moving out west.

2. Schools are only poor due to the communities that surround them. If you stick inner city Detroit into La Jolla the schools in La Jolla will suck as well.

3. Who cares about parking when you can walk your kid down baseball field?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,493,769 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by krudmonk View Post
Far-flung suburbs should be cut off from city funding. You are free to live way out there, but why should we pay for roads, streetlights, sewage and all that just to reach a few people who choose to live in plastic homes that all look alike? The money goes a long way to meet real social services so why waste it patching potholes that will just be reopened by the next Hummer that thunders by?
Eh?

You realize a lot of suburban communities are incorporated cities and are independent entities?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 10:37 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,361,589 times
Reputation: 2975
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
Don't pretend that people living in suburbs don't pay property taxes. Are you under the illusion that a city like LA pays to pave the roads in Riverside?
LA's taxes go to the state. Are none distributed to huge roads in IE that feed back to LA?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
Eh?

You realize a lot of suburban communities are incorporated cities and are independent entities?
So they pay for freeway widenings and such? The wealth of industry in these exurbs is funding their glut of twelve-lane boulevards?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 11:01 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,476,314 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by krudmonk View Post
LA's taxes go to the state. Are none distributed to huge roads in IE that feed back to LA?

So they pay for freeway widenings and such? The wealth of industry in these exurbs is funding their glut of twelve-lane boulevards?
I'll make you a deal: You won't have to pay for roads in the suburbs if we don't have our property tax money redistributed and poured down the inner-city rat hole of waste and corruption you call a public school system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 12:47 AM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,361,589 times
Reputation: 2975
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
I'll make you a deal: You won't have to pay for roads in the suburbs if we don't have our property tax money redistributed and poured down the inner-city rat hole of waste and corruption you call a public school system.
Get out of the '50s already...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 01:12 AM
 
Location: Cushing OK
14,539 posts, read 21,283,482 times
Reputation: 16944
The *roads* in the county's are paid for by the counties. Thus, Riverside maintains Riverside roads. LA maintains LA roads.

The *freeways* are funded through caltrans. This is a state agency. Improvements and maintaince may be of more immediate advantage and safety of the local area, but the overall idea is to provide somoene in LA who decides to go to San Diego a sufficently maintained road they can get there. And the freeways are a part of the interstate system.

Even if you wipe out the suburbs and have only rural and urban you still have roads to maintain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 09:39 AM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,361,589 times
Reputation: 2975
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightbird47 View Post
Even if you wipe out the suburbs and have only rural and urban you still have roads to maintain.
So maintaining two-lanes highways and the dirt roads which feed them is the same maintaining 8-lane freeways and the 6-lane bouelvards that feed those?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 09:56 AM
 
9,527 posts, read 30,501,156 times
Reputation: 6440
A ridiculous article which has incited a number of ridiculous responses.

- Richard Florida has an agenda, he has written this article (or appeared in similar) dozens of times

- no one is abandoning the suburbs, on the contrary most suburbs continue to grow despite an increasing interest in moving back to cities

- newly built exurban cities 1+ hour outside of metros are primarily the ones with the overbuilding and foreclosure problems

- most suburban and exurban communities in CA are THEIR OWN CITIES with their own tax base and get their own share of money from the STATE, not the city they happen to be an exurb to.

I live in the city but I am not going to delude myself into thinking that the majority (especially those in the child-rearing stage of life) will be willing to take bad schools, crime and more expensive housing to be closer to cafes and doggie boutiques. Richard Florida is painfully elite and out-of-touch with how actual people live... he is trapped in his yuppie-academic fantasy about the "creative class" which he has based his entire career on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top