Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-02-2011, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,664 posts, read 67,596,324 times
Reputation: 21255

Advertisements

What?

Quote:
Some are practically salivating over the $41.3 billion in “reserves” from what they call “the 250 wealthiest special districts” in California. They contend it is obscene for any special district to have extra money in reserves while the state is hurting and faces yet another mega-deficit. This time around the deficit is $26.6 billion.

Even though all of that $41.3 billion held by special districts was collected for a specific purpose and restricted by state law on how it can be used, there is a suggestion that perhaps it is time for the state to change state law. It is the same argument behind the redevelopment agency money grab effort.

So if it is all bets are off on legal requirements on what money can be collected and spent for, maybe the state should go after the biggest pot of fund balances in California - its own.

At the end of the last fiscal year Sacramento had $80.2 billion in its coffers.

Manteca Bulletin - Sacramento should tap the $80B they have on hand first
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2011, 02:31 PM
 
30,904 posts, read 36,998,853 times
Reputation: 34557
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
What?
The article doesn't talk about what agencies have the money and what they do with it. It also doesn't mention that if you don't allow special districts to set aside money for a rainy day, then those districts will blow all their money in good times and have nothing left when bad times come (which is what the state does).

Even if the kinds of issues I just presented weren't a factor, I don't think the $80 Billion would really fix the underlying structural problems which are: 1. unfunded pension liabilities and 2. skyrocketing health care costs for MediCal.

Business as usual needs to change. Throwing more money at problems just puts off the day of reckoning for another year or two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2011, 03:14 PM
 
Location: SW MO
23,593 posts, read 37,506,794 times
Reputation: 29337
Nothing will change until there's a change of culture and a change of faces at the Capitol. Until both of those occur it is and will remain, so-old, same-old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2011, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Mokelumne Hill, CA & El Pescadero, BCS MX.
6,957 posts, read 22,325,306 times
Reputation: 6471
The special district I sat on the board of had to fork over a loan (not much of a loan so much as a "we're taking this money and we'll pay it back soon) to the state of about 14K last year. We are definitely a small fish in a big pond, but I don't doubt that there's uncommitted money out there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2011, 05:25 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,738,243 times
Reputation: 23296
Gotta love my boy Dennis.

Just to let you know he has a interest in not seeing Manteca's RDA disbanded because of how well it is run and what it has done for the development of Manteca and the surrounding area. It truely is one of the better run RDA programs in the state.

Tell em tiger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top