Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Maryland > Baltimore
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-16-2014, 10:30 PM
 
1 posts, read 1,532 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

Hello all

I am hoping that one of you has some experience with this situation. I have been told that they are putting in several Non-Elderly Disabled (NED's) housing units next to my home. This is a federal voucher program that is supposed to transition people from nursing homes or health facilities to apartment living according to the literature. The definition that they give for this word is vague. It doesn't really say what kind of people that would include. The problem is that I cannot find any any contact people to help me figure out what kind of people that would include. I have very young children under 6 and I want to find out who will be moving into my neighborhood. Specifically, would that include felons, drug addicts, people with serious mental problems. Again, I am not one of those not in my backyard type of people. I just need to know if I need to move before they are finished so that I can keep my kids safe. Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2014, 07:52 PM
 
687 posts, read 915,547 times
Reputation: 2243
Consider moving. Sounds like bad news. Likely you will have "Disabled" adults in their 30s and 40s who simply don't want to take care of themselves living in your neighborhood (that you worked hard for) who are going to be doing a lot of sitting/standing around while you're away at work.

Oh, and you get to pay taxes so that these people can have free housing...and destroy the neighborhood in the process. That is, after all, what federal housing programs tend to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2014, 11:14 AM
 
389 posts, read 427,029 times
Reputation: 309
Quote:
Originally Posted by mapmd View Post
Consider moving. Sounds like bad news. Likely you will have "Disabled" adults in their 30s and 40s who simply don't want to take care of themselves living in your neighborhood (that you worked hard for) who are going to be doing a lot of sitting/standing around while you're away at work.

Oh, and you get to pay taxes so that these people can have free housing...and destroy the neighborhood in the process. That is, after all, what federal housing programs tend to do.
Not every younger adult who are disabled are bad news. I'm 28 and I'm disabled. Sure I can take care of myself but I do need help from my family and from my doctors and therapist. I have a disorder called fibromyalgia and it is no walk in the park. I worked for 10 years prior to being diagnosed. Never have I ever wanted to stand/sit outside, prior and after being diagnosed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2014, 08:23 PM
 
1,310 posts, read 1,510,792 times
Reputation: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunflowery View Post
Not every younger adult who are disabled are bad news. I'm 28 and I'm disabled. Sure I can take care of myself but I do need help from my family and from my doctors and therapist. I have a disorder called fibromyalgia and it is no walk in the park. I worked for 10 years prior to being diagnosed. Never have I ever wanted to stand/sit outside, prior and after being diagnosed.
I agree it would be incorrect to disparage the none elderly disabled (NEDs) as individuals. Most are probably just fine. Unfortunately, the sad story of what the inclusion of NEDs has done to Baltimore's (formerly) senior highrises should give the neighbors pause. NEDs have taken over the drug trade in the highrises, especially J Van Story on 20th Street, and turned them into places where it is unsafe for seniors to live.

Medical confidentiality rules make good management difficult because the managers aren't allowed to know what is going on medically with their tenants. While medical confidentiality is generally a good thing, the fact that the tenant is getting free housing based on the medical condition would seem to support management having some access to updated on the tenant's condition. After all, if management can't find out about the health status of the tenant, they have no way of knowing if the disability still exists. It is extremely difficult to evict a NED from public housing even for outrageous bad behavior. Fortunately, your new neighbors may not be quite as protected as public housing tenants. BUT BEWARE!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2014, 04:10 AM
 
1,915 posts, read 3,991,475 times
Reputation: 3061
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwduvall View Post
I agree it would be incorrect to disparage the none elderly disabled (NEDs) as individuals. Most are probably just fine. Unfortunately, the sad story of what the inclusion of NEDs has done to Baltimore's (formerly) senior highrises should give the neighbors pause. NEDs have taken over the drug trade in the highrises, especially J Van Story on 20th Street, and turned them into places where it is unsafe for seniors to live.

Medical confidentiality rules make good management difficult because the managers aren't allowed to know what is going on medically with their tenants. While medical confidentiality is generally a good thing, the fact that the tenant is getting free housing based on the medical condition would seem to support management having some access to updated on the tenant's condition. After all, if management can't find out about the health status of the tenant, they have no way of knowing if the disability still exists. It is extremely difficult to evict a NED from public housing even for outrageous bad behavior. Fortunately, your new neighbors may not be quite as protected as public housing tenants. BUT BEWARE!
HIPAA laws actually would make the health condition confidential, and a landlord/neighbors would not be identified as a party that needed to know that information. The neighbors would be more protected than public housing tenants. Good thing is registered sex offenders would be excluded from the program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Maryland > Baltimore
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top