Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-26-2015, 06:15 AM
 
Location: Taipei
8,864 posts, read 8,440,884 times
Reputation: 7414

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jezer View Post
I've seen some insensitive posts in my time and this one is high up there.
Totally.

Quote:
Originally Posted by so954 View Post
The co-pilot of the doomed Germanwings A320 “voluntarily” put the aircraft into a dive and was alive until the moment of impact, the Marseilles prosecutor said citing a transcript of the last 30 minutes of the cockpit voice recorder.

Germanwings co-pilot intended to destroy plane, says French prosecutor
And I certainly hope this isn't true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-26-2015, 06:23 AM
 
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
7,138 posts, read 11,027,344 times
Reputation: 7808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xircal View Post
The problem here seems to be that once the Lock selector is enabled, the door will remain locked for between 5 and 20 minutes according to the flight manual.

However, the scenario you've described doesn't seem likely because slumping over the selector would have to be a sideways motion. If the PF became incapacitated for whatever reason, he/she would simply slump in the seat as illustrated in the video.

If the cockpit door was locked deliberately by the PF after the FO had left the flight deck, then it would seem more likely to be a CFIT incident with pilot suicide as the main factor.
From the video it looks to me like it would be pretty easy to accidentally flip the switch into the locked position. Especially if the pilot is having some kind of issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Morrisville, NC
9,144 posts, read 14,762,210 times
Reputation: 9070
According to what they released this morning, they said they could hear the pilot "breathing normally" for 10 minutes until impact, while they could hear the pilot trying to break the door down eventually.

One, that had to be some chilling tape to listen to and two, that would seem to rule out him having some sort of involuntary movements like from a seizure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 07:09 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,633 posts, read 18,209,295 times
Reputation: 34496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woof View Post
I suppose it's possible that the pilot had some medical condition like very low blood sugar that can make someone confused without actually passing out, and locked the door from the panel instead of opening it when there was pounding on it. Maybe he then in confusion thought that he had to immediately lower the altitude for some reason, thinking his problem was from depressurization? Or that he was landing normally at destination?

However, at this time, I'm putting down my quarter on the pilot deliberately committing suicide for whatever reason, whether personal or terrorist. But on the personal level, he'd have had to be a total sociopath to want to take so many people with him ......... and if it was terrorism, why didn't he get a message out saying so? It would have been wasted in it's purpose of creating terror if it was never found out what happened or who did it.

Furthermore, it probably wouldn't have been a passenger forcing his way in or getting let in as part of a plot, since the other pilot wasn't concerned at first, just tapping at the door. If someone strange had gone into the cockpit, the other crew members would have noticed and raised the alarm.
Except this seems to be creating adequate terror, with various flight crews refusing to fly now due to this incident.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 07:14 AM
 
622 posts, read 526,955 times
Reputation: 564
The co-pilot has been named as Andreas Lubitz, 28 from a small town in Germany called Montabaur in Rhineland-Palatinate according to French prosecutors.

His full name is though is Andreas Guenter Lubitz. I note from his background that his medical designation was due to expire in June this year. I wonder if that has a bearing on the case.

See here for more details: Andreas Guenter Lubitz - Rheinland Pfalz | Pilots and Airmen

Sorry guys, but you'll have to grab the URL from that. This forum won't let me post web addresses for some unknown reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Metro Washington DC
15,430 posts, read 25,807,497 times
Reputation: 10450
I remember all the debates about strengthening cockpit doors after 9/11. They wanted to make it impossible, or at least extremely difficult for a hijacker to break in. Now we see it even keeps a pilot out in an emergency. There definitely needs to be a way in that can't be locked out from the inside. Either that or a lav inside the cockpit that can't be locked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 07:31 AM
 
622 posts, read 526,955 times
Reputation: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkf747 View Post
I remember all the debates about strengthening cockpit doors after 9/11. They wanted to make it impossible, or at least extremely difficult for a hijacker to break in. Now we see it even keeps a pilot out in an emergency. There definitely needs to be a way in that can't be locked out from the inside. Either that or a lav inside the cockpit that can't be locked.
Here's the FAA link to the cockpit door hardening directive: Press Release – Airlines Meet FAA's Hardened Cockpit Door Deadline

I agree with you completely though. It's ironical that a measure designed to enhance passenger safety can veritably lead to their demise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 07:37 AM
 
2,727 posts, read 2,833,497 times
Reputation: 4113
In addition to everything mentioned, I find it highly strange the pilot left (presumably for the bathroom) on a 90-min flight. I mean who knows, maybe he wasn't feeling well, or any number of things - but guys like this are highly robotical and are mentally programmed to not be fickle and need to go tinkle during a 90 min flight. The odds of the pilot leaving cockpit during a 90 min flight are probably 1%, and at that very moment, an unstable co pilot takes advantage of a situation and crashes the plane?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 07:52 AM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,551,696 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeymags View Post
In addition to everything mentioned, I find it highly strange the pilot left (presumably for the bathroom) on a 90-min flight.
That is an excellent point. A scenario where the co pilot is murderously depressed, and he flies around for weeks on short flights waiting for the pilot to go to the bathroom is implausible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 08:09 AM
 
Location: Saint Louis, MO
3,483 posts, read 9,015,984 times
Reputation: 2480
Pilots go to the bathroom all the time, even on 90 minute flights. If you've flown a couple legs, and didn't see a bathroom near the gate you were parked and you have to be airborne within a few minutes (add in if you had to grab lunch, or another drink) you may be pressed for time. Often, the aircraft lav is the only place you have time to relieve yourself.

Sometimes I'd go a week w/o a fellow pilot using the lav, but other times it seemed like the guys went every other leg.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top