Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-29-2008, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Austin TX
1,590 posts, read 4,575,830 times
Reputation: 458

Advertisements

Short story!!!

I have had this 5 cylinder 20 valve turbo charged Audi for 8 years and 110k. It is chipped and when dynoed it was putting about 28psi of presure through! So it broke at 190K after a number of track days etc....

I got a new head for it as well as a bigger turbo, injectors, exhaust, exhaust manifold, and an upgraded ECU (ecu is what we think failed in the first place) this is all done to Audi RS2 specs. Not cheap but I love the car!

The machine shop that cleaned up the head shaved 0.012 in off even though they were told NOT to!!! Like my 4.5 year old son they were not listening and used to work on big american V8's. When you are putting close to 300hp on the ground with a 2.2 liter motor things get a bit more dicy

MY question: Should I get a compression droping gasket or should I put a stock gasket back on there?

It is turbo charged and higher compression is not good but will -0.012 in matter or should I not risk it and go +0.005in. USING A THICKER GASKET?

I have both gaskets just debating which to use!!!!

Thank you for your thoughts!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-29-2008, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
5,987 posts, read 11,674,449 times
Reputation: 36729
Use the thicker gasket unless you plan on using racing fuel. Extra compression is likely to cause detonation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 10:34 AM
 
Location: WA
5,641 posts, read 24,955,595 times
Reputation: 6574
I suggest you try some of the Audi forums to get experienced advice.

On many cars you would be OK and many others have a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 11:08 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,712 posts, read 58,054,000 times
Reputation: 46182
I would use the thicker gasket, but you can do a volumetric calculation of reduction in compression chamber since you know the head cavity configuration. There may be some SS shim gaskets available. I can get them with a CDN part number for my VW's (diesel). If you can get a SS head gasket, they are typically laminated and you can pull off the stack height you need.

Do Check out the forums, there are some Audi groups on VW Vortex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2008, 11:29 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,185,348 times
Reputation: 29983
I don't understand why you'd even want to take a chance when you're already cramming 28 pounds worth of boost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2008, 09:42 PM
 
Location: Austin TX
1,590 posts, read 4,575,830 times
Reputation: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
I don't understand why you'd even want to take a chance when you're already cramming 28 pounds worth of boost.
Yes I won't. A headgasket to new spec is on its way!

I had ask the question to several old school audi mechanics, but I wanted an unbiased more theoretical confirmation!

I am on vortex but find the noise to knowledge ratio on older Audi stuff to be rather high .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2008, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Incognito
7,005 posts, read 21,336,879 times
Reputation: 5522
I would use the thicker one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2008, 04:47 PM
 
Location: Eastern Washington
17,216 posts, read 57,078,859 times
Reputation: 18579
You might want to cc the head as-milled, compare to stock. Without knowing the combustion chamber shape you can't say for certain how much milling a head will change compression. There are thumb rules out there for the most popular Detroit V-8's, IIRC, but a. I don't know them and b. they wouldn't apply to your Audi.

Once you know how many cc's you lost, you could approximate the added gasket volume of a cylinder (OK, a pancake-shaped cylinder but mathematically it's a cylinder) with diameter equal to bore size and height equal to the *difference* in thickness between the regular gasket and the thick one.

I'd at least check with a turbo-Audi guru and consider maybe getting an un-milled head. I do know that BMW's party line is you can't mill the head much at all or it's not usable.

You may want to think about valve clearance to the piston, although with turbo engines this is usually not an issue.

At 28# of boost (roughly 43 PSIA), your ideal charge density would be nearly 3X what a very good breathing NA engine makes. Due to charge heating it's not that high, but, you are getting pretty close to Jet Propulsion Lab's turf, if you know what I mean. (not that that's a bad thing)

Last edited by M3 Mitch; 08-01-2008 at 04:48 PM.. Reason: correct spelling error
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2008, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Austin TX
1,590 posts, read 4,575,830 times
Reputation: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3 Mitch View Post

At 28# of boost (roughly 43 PSIA), your ideal charge density would be nearly 3X what a very good breathing NA engine makes. Due to charge heating it's not that high, but, you are getting pretty close to Jet Propulsion Lab's turf, if you know what I mean. (not that that's a bad thing)
Mitch thanks a bunch, I have spoken with several Audi techs and they all agree: put the thicker one on! Several had at first said that they thought it would not matter, but when I found someone that could make the proper gasket for a reasonable amount of money they all said to go for it!

As for the 28 lbs of boost, it had been running that for 130k so I am not that concerned with it, obviously it is not an american V8 where tolerances are a lot looser, so things in this motor need to be as close to specs to get the proper compression and everything needs to be clamped down pritty well! Getting a masive boost leak on TWS sounded like a bomb exploded out front . This old lady does put over 100hp per liter to the wheels so its got to be right the first time!

Thanks for your input!!! Now cross your fingers! rep points to all!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top