Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2011, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Behind you
388 posts, read 850,373 times
Reputation: 142

Advertisements

Anyone know how Austin public schools rank among the state and among other states? I'm habing trouble finding actual good rankings on this topic, all I really have is word of mouth, which isnt too good so far.

I have a friend of mine that had kids that started school in TX, then moved to CA and found they were completely behind the learning curve in this state, almost a full year behind. Recently, he is having to put them back in school in TX for a year and is finding that his kids are now very well ahead of their peers.

I know its hard to judge a states or cities school system if you've lived there forever, growing up and going to school in Maryland I thought the schools sucked, but come to find out, we had one of the best school systems in the nation. Anyone have any thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2011, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,273 posts, read 35,693,423 times
Reputation: 8617
Depends on the school and district, really. Greatschools.net ranks schools, although I have never paid much attention to how it does it. In AISD there are many schools that I think are excellent, and some not so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Austin
1,774 posts, read 3,799,029 times
Reputation: 800
It seems the only state that's really ahead of the pack is Massachusetts. So maybe...go east, young man?

CA doesn't look too bad, Texas doesn't look too good. I'm guessing AISD is fairly representative of the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,220,324 times
Reputation: 9270
Schools in Texas are highly variable in quality. It is impossible to truly say schools in any particular city or the state have any particular quality.

In the Austin area, there are many Independent School Districts (ISDs). The groupings below are my opinions, a bit arbitrary, and I don't mean to pick a fight with anyone. Others may have a different perspective.

Best
- Eanes (small, wealthy)
- Round Rock (bigger, very solid overall)
- Lake Travis (faster growing, consistently good)

Better
- Leander (large, fast growing, solid)
- Dripping Springs (rural flavor, good performance)
- Pflugerville

Average
- Austin (wide range of school performance, some very good, some poor, neighborhood specific)

Challenged
- Bastrop
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Plano, TX
1,011 posts, read 2,467,402 times
Reputation: 1158
I've lived in Austin (went to AISD and Eanes) and worked on a project where I travelled to Lompoc before (supporting NASA launch). When it was mentioned that I went to Berkeley before, I was accused of not being qualified and a token because I was Chinese. I'm sorry, the main businesses around Lompoc are the Air Force Base and the prison, but somebody is seriously trolling ... If you or your friend love California so much, that's great, feel free to enjoy your state. However, don't you have something better to do than to make up Texas BS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 02:28 PM
 
3,091 posts, read 3,275,687 times
Reputation: 2514
The OP's specific question is probably best answered by those who have a direct point of comparison, but here is something to chew on based on NewsWeek's high school rankings (this is a snippet of an email I sent to someone earlier in the year when the rankings came out):

Quote:
Newsweek listing of the top high schools in the nation:

rank school student graduation % college AP/IB
teacher rate bound Tests
ratio %
---- --------- ------- ------------- --------- ------
21 LASA 16.7 100 96 6.7
47 Westwood 29.1 98 93 4.6
72 Westlake 14.0 98 87 5.3
144 Harmony 12.3 100 86 3.8
474 Anderson 13.4 93 77 2.6
488 Lake Travis 16.0 94 79 1.8

First time I've seen Westwood ranked higher than Westlake. Don't know if the Westwood student/teacher ratio is correct since it seems out of whack with the others. Texas had 14 in the top 100 and 3 in the top 10. The Dallas/Ft Worth area had #1, #2, #10 (2 magnet schools and 1 prep school). The AP/IB number is the average number of AP/IB tests taken per graduate, this seems a bit misleading since IB works differently than AP so it may be skewed a bit towards schools that focus on AP vs IB.

California had 10 schools in the top 100 (4 less than Texas) and only 1 school in the top 10 (#8 in Irvine).
So based on that measure, it wouldn't seem at first blush that Cali schools are "better". Of course it's impossible to generalize from one persons experience. Even within Austin (let alone TX or the US) you are going to have different experiences in different schools (even on the same campus ala LASA/LBJ). Plus the above is for high schools (it would be pretty impracticable to rank below that level) so the variations in middle/elementary schools is just going to be more significant. Speaking of which, again if he above numbers have any meaning at all, having some variation at the below high school level in the end would appear to "wash out". In other words, even if Cali elementary/middle schools were somehow more "advanced" than Tx, the above rankings would seem to imply that by the time the kiddos got to high school, that any difference doesn't really matter. At least on the high end anyway, maybe the numbers tell us that in the top 10% it doesn't matter, but we just don't see what happens below that? Ahh, so many ways to interpret the numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Behind you
388 posts, read 850,373 times
Reputation: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by compSciGuy View Post
I've lived in Austin (went to AISD and Eanes) and worked on a project where I travelled to Lompoc before (supporting NASA launch). When it was mentioned that I went to Berkeley before, I was accused of not being qualified and a token because I was Chinese. I'm sorry, the main businesses around Lompoc are the Air Force Base and the prison, but somebody is seriously trolling ... If you or your friend love California so much, that's great, feel free to enjoy your state. However, don't you have something better to do than to make up Texas BS.
Looks like you have nothing better to do than sit and write something akin to what I saw on the toilet paper after I wiped this morning(always need to check for odd colors, right?). What a waste of time on your part, but I appreciate the sincere concern you have over why I am asking an actual relevant question which I dont even know how anyone could consider trolling.

Knowing what you do about there being a military base in Lompoc, and that I stated I grew up and went to school in Maryland, along with an anecdote from a friend(also military, thats why his kids are in and out of schools in TX) about his experinces with the scooling differential, your first instinct is that I am a CA loving Schwarzenegger-til-I-die west coastie, and not a Military member here out of service to the nation, huh? Good call.

Anyways, for those that are taking my question about my future seriously, I appreciate the input and your thoughts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Behind you
388 posts, read 850,373 times
Reputation: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by austinnerd View Post
The OP's specific question is probably best answered by those who have a direct point of comparison, but here is something to chew on based on NewsWeek's high school rankings (this is a snippet of an email I sent to someone earlier in the year when the rankings came out):



So based on that measure, it wouldn't seem at first blush that Cali schools are "better". Of course it's impossible to generalize from one persons experience. Even within Austin (let alone TX or the US) you are going to have different experiences in different schools (even on the same campus ala LASA/LBJ). Plus the above is for high schools (it would be pretty impracticable to rank below that level) so the variations in middle/elementary schools is just going to be more significant. Speaking of which, again if he above numbers have any meaning at all, having some variation at the below high school level in the end would appear to "wash out". In other words, even if Cali elementary/middle schools were somehow more "advanced" than Tx, the above rankings would seem to imply that by the time the kiddos got to high school, that any difference doesn't really matter. At least on the high end anyway, maybe the numbers tell us that in the top 10% it doesn't matter, but we just don't see what happens below that? Ahh, so many ways to interpret the numbers.
Just for reference I am not directly trying to compare TX and CA schools. I will not be living here when my child is school age. I am more looking at how Austin stacks up against anywhere else in the U.S., but I do appreciate the info you have given me, thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 04:11 PM
 
1,961 posts, read 6,130,276 times
Reputation: 571
But what about football?

I've been overall impressed with the LISD over Round Rock in general. Round Rock seems to have a few stellar schools and some not so much. LISD seems to be pretty consistent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2011, 04:18 PM
 
1,430 posts, read 2,379,152 times
Reputation: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by capcat View Post
It seems the only state that's really ahead of the pack is Massachusetts. So maybe...go east, young man?

CA doesn't look too bad, Texas doesn't look too good. I'm guessing AISD is fairly representative of the state.
Texas schools are way, way better than California. Go poke around the NAEP statistics to see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top