Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-16-2010, 11:10 AM
 
1,148 posts, read 2,786,757 times
Reputation: 639

Advertisements

Austin foreclosures up from '09, steady since May - Austin Business Journal

Year on Year foreclosures in Austin are up 98%, a huge number. From May to June the numbers are up a more modest 6% but its obvious Austin isnt out of the woods yet in terms of real estate. Hutto and Manor are really hurting badly with 1 out of 58 homes in serious arrears or in foreclosure. The entire state of Texas' real estate picture is worsening as now 1 in 148 homes is either in serious arrears or in foreclosure.

Jobs picture for Central Texas is also bad unfortunately. The area is shedding high paying education, government, and health jobs and adding 'leisure and hospitality' jobs. Where the stimulus money is going is anyones guess because its obviously not going to keep government workers in their jobs.

The article says it increased 5 percentage points month to month but I assume it must mean .5 percentage points from 6.9 to 7.4% for Central Texas. Still either way a bit concerning.

Cental Texas jobless rate rises to 7.4% - Austin Business Journal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2010, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Pflugerville
2,211 posts, read 4,861,359 times
Reputation: 2242
Quote:
Originally Posted by orbius View Post
Austin foreclosures up from '09, steady since May - Austin Business Journal

Year on Year foreclosures in Austin are up 98%, a huge number. From May to June the numbers are up a more modest 6% but its obvious Austin isnt out of the woods yet in terms of real estate. Hutto and Manor are really hurting badly with 1 out of 58 homes in serious arrears or in foreclosure. The entire state of Texas' real estate picture is worsening as now 1 in 148 homes is either in serious arrears or in foreclosure.

Jobs picture for Central Texas is also bad unfortunately. The area is shedding high paying education, government, and health jobs and adding 'leisure and hospitality' jobs. Where the stimulus money is going is anyones guess because its obviously not going to keep government workers in their jobs.

The article says it increased 5 percentage points month to month but I assume it must mean .5 percentage points from 6.9 to 7.4% for Central Texas. Still either way a bit concerning.

Cental Texas jobless rate rises to 7.4% - Austin Business Journal
Moderator cut: off topic The economy, and foreclosures, are bad ALL OVER THE WORLD. Austin is doing much better than most places.

Moderator cut: off topic

Last edited by RaleighLass; 07-19-2010 at 05:51 PM.. Reason: Off topic, comments directed at other poster
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,688,366 times
Reputation: 27720
Just tighten the belt, stay liquid and grit your teeth and make due with what we have.
Recall that we were late to the game so maybe we have yet to hit our peak.
More people coming than jobs available and more people trying to maintain two homes puts a strain on even healthy economies.

It is what it is. I am thankful though that I am in Texas to weather out this financial storm and have been prepared to deal with deflation, tight credit and a tight job market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 01:54 PM
 
5 posts, read 43,640 times
Reputation: 15
Actually foreclosures are up 98% vs the same month last year. That should be the title since most real estate stats are annualized. Of course the Austin real estate cheerleaders would have to the the ABJ to spin it. This great news for buyers! I don't understand the bias towards sellers. Low prices are only bad for one party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Corvallis, Oregon
653 posts, read 1,798,127 times
Reputation: 276
Well I have been watching a particular market (I get the emails for each update). While it is a small market, most of the activity is
- price reduced
- status change (usually one that was sale pending going back on the market)
- houses just pulled (and I notice this when I see it no longer there, and not listed as pending).

I knew it was not the best time to buy, but I needed a place to live, and it was the right house.

Low prices are bad for multiple parties, sellers and Realtors.
High prices are only bad for one party, buyers.

Personally I would LOVE it if house prices were steady, rising only based on inflation.
That would likely keep sales steady, and more to those who want to own the property than to investors who only hope to turn it for profit. It would make for a much healthier housing market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Back home in California
589 posts, read 1,816,593 times
Reputation: 292
Moderator cut: referenced deleted post


Things are hard all over; but here in Austin, things are better than just about anywhere else in the Country. (For me that means, the World.) You should try to focus on what good is still going on here and continue to count yourself lucky that you live in such a fabulous City.

Last edited by RaleighLass; 07-19-2010 at 05:56 PM.. Reason: referenced orphaned post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 02:49 PM
 
5 posts, read 43,640 times
Reputation: 15
Default Prices

Quote:
Originally Posted by eileenkeeney View Post
Well I have been watching a particular market (I get the emails for each update). While it is a small market, most of the activity is
- price reduced
- status change (usually one that was sale pending going back on the market)
- houses just pulled (and I notice this when I see it no longer there, and not listed as pending).

I knew it was not the best time to buy, but I needed a place to live, and it was the right house.

Low prices are bad for multiple parties, sellers and Realtors.
High prices are only bad for one party, buyers.

Personally I would LOVE it if house prices were steady, rising only based on inflation.
That would likely keep sales steady, and more to those who want to own the property than to investors who only hope to turn it for profit. It would make for a much healthier housing market.
Low prices aren't really bad for realtors. No transactions are bad for realtors. They need the market to "clear" because they get paid when buyers and sellers agree and transact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,259,789 times
Reputation: 9270
Moderator cut: referenced deleted post text

I always like to see data.

But there is an interesting quote from the article:

"Even with the increasing figures, overall Austin still ranks low among metro areas with the highest number of foreclosures in June, checking in at No. 118 of the 203 areas that RealtyTrac monitors. Austin came in at No. 120 in May and No. 115 in April."

Last edited by RaleighLass; 07-19-2010 at 05:57 PM.. Reason: Referenced deleted text
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 03:38 PM
 
1,148 posts, read 2,786,757 times
Reputation: 639
I agree the numbers for the rest of the country are really concerning and its a good thing Austin is doing better. 1 in 75 houses in foreclosure during a 6 month period for the country as a whole. While Austin is about 1 in 145, much better but still up 42% year on year.

Quote:
Moderator cut: referenced deleted text I wish you felt better about Austin and the future.

Things are hard all over; but here in Austin, things are better than just about anywhere else in the Country. (For me that means, the World.) Moderator cut: off topic
Moderator cut: referenced other member

Last edited by RaleighLass; 07-19-2010 at 06:03 PM.. Reason: referenced deleted text and other member-against TOS
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2010, 04:00 PM
 
Location: SW Austin & Wimberley
6,333 posts, read 18,094,951 times
Reputation: 5535
From the article:

Quote:
One in every 655 houses foreclosed or was in danger of foreclosing in June, a 98 percent increase from the same month in 2009.
So, let's ask what this "98%" increase means. Doesn't seem that bad to me, as hoffdano pointed out with a quote from the actual article.

Before the 98% increase, how many homes out of 655 were in danger of foreclosing? Would it be 0.5050? (1/1.98) So, if you live in a 655 home subdivision, there is one foreclosed home? And a month ago there was only a half a foreclosure, or a foreclosure every two months instead of one month?

Is that's the bad news we're talking about here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top