Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


West Cypress Hills Elementary School in SPICEWOOD, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 90
Address
 6112 CYPRESS RANCH BLVD
SPICEWOOD, TX 78669
Telephone
(512) 533-6000
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
90
Students
605
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
37.6
Free lunch eligible students
42
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
8
School district
LAKE TRAVIS ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
LAKE TRAVIS MIDDLE (3.2 miles):

99
DRIPPING SPRINGS EL (9.3 miles):

99
BEE CAVE EL (7.4 miles):

97
SERENE HILLS EL (4.9 miles):

96
LAKEWAY EL (6.4 miles):

94
LAKE TRAVIS H S (6.9 miles):

90
West Cypress Hills Elementary School:

90
LAGO VISTA H S (8.8 miles):

78
SPICEWOOD EL (9.3 miles):

73
West Cypress Hills Elementary School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
SPICEWOOD:

87
West Cypress Hills Elementary:

90

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 605
Enrollment in 2015: 525

Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students28210610810098109605
Female students1354557565257303
Male students1476151444652302
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - 1 - - - 1
Asian students - 54161219
Hispanic students - 11131719131487
Black students - - 311 - - 5
White students2648080707984459
Two or More Races students - 26845934

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 2
Kindergarten enrollment: 82
1st grade enrollment: 106
2nd grade enrollment: 108
3rd grade enrollment: 100
4th grade enrollment: 98
5th grade enrollment: 109

West Cypress Hills Elementary School - Enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 303 (50.1%)
West Cypress Hills Elementary School:

50.1%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 302 (49.9%)
School:

49.9%
State:

50.1%

West Cypress Hills Elementary School - Enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Here:

0.2%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 19 (3.1%)
School:

3.1%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 87 (14.4%)
West Cypress Hills Elementary School:

14.4%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 5 (0.8%)
School:

0.8%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 459 (75.9%)
School:

75.9%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 34 (5.6%)
Here:

5.6%
State:

2.1%

West Cypress Hills Elementary School - Enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 50 (8.3%)
Here:

8.3%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 42 (6.9%)
West Cypress Hills Elementary School:

6.9%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 8 (1.3%)
Here:

1.3%
Texas:

6.2%

West Cypress Hills Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 37.6

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 6
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

16.1
State:

15.6

School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,129,873
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 37.1 (Salary Expenditures: $1,735,936)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $59,276)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $246,261)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $88,400)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,335,788
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $393,936
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,735,936
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $59,276)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $246,260)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $88,400)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $1,391,124

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 11 (male: 2, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 2 (all female)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 55 (male: 32, female: 23)
  • Hispanic: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
  • White: 41 (male: 22, female: 19)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 28 (male: 18, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,651 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Here:

2.4%
Texas:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
West Cypress Hills Elementary School:

3.7%
State:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
West Cypress Hills Elementary School:

2.0%
State:

4.1%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian4
  • Black2
  • White28
  • Multirace7
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 45 (male: 20, female: 25)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 28 (male: 11, female: 17)
  • Two or More Races: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

74.4
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,576
  • Males1,575
  • Females1,576
  • Hispanic1,531
  • Asian1,707
  • White1,568
  • Multirace1,638
Math Average Scale Score:

1,576
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 147
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 147

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.6 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 51%

5%
22%
22%
51%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,575, Tested: 82, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 50%)
7%
19%
24%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 52%)
3%
26%
19%
52%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,531, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 38%)
4%
38%
20%
38%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,707, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 63%)
37%
63%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 104, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 51%)
7%
21%
21%
51%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 63%)
12%
25%
63%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,543
  • Males1,538
  • Females1,550
  • Hispanic1,496
  • Asian1,648
  • White1,540
  • Multirace1,574
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,543
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 146
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 147

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (92%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 51%

7%
18%
24%
51%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 47%)
5%
20%
28%
47%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 55%)
9%
16%
20%
55%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 39%)
4%
31%
26%
39%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 75%)
12%
13%
75%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 104, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 48%)
9%
16%
27%
48%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,574, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 75%)
12%
13%
75%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,614
  • Males1,624
  • Females1,605
  • Hispanic1,612
  • White1,612
  • Multirace1,586
Math Average Scale Score:

1,614
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 142
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 142

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.6 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.9 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

13%
24%
32%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,624, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 35%)
13%
21%
31%
35%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 27%)
14%
27%
32%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 33%)
21%
16%
30%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 104, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 30%)
13%
25%
33%
30%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 27%)
9%
36%
28%
27%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,596
  • Males1,590
  • Females1,601
  • Hispanic1,607
  • White1,593
  • Multirace1,573
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,596
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 142
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 142

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 44%

13%
18%
25%
44%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 46%)
11%
23%
20%
46%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 42%)
14%
14%
30%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 42%)
21%
37%
42%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 104, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 45%)
12%
22%
21%
45%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,573, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 27%)
9%
27%
37%
27%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,919
  • Males3,844
  • Females3,994
  • Hispanic3,940
  • White3,918
  • Multirace3,763
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,919
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 142
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 142

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.7 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

26%
25%
35%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,844, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 7%)
30%
28%
35%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,994, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 21%)
23%
21%
35%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,940, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
33%
17%
37%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,918, Tested: 104, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 14%)
23%
30%
33%
14%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,763, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 9%)
45%
46%
9%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,702
  • Males1,670
  • Females1,731
  • Hispanic1,682
  • Asian1,815
  • White1,699
  • Multirace1,688
Math Average Scale Score:

1,702
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 123
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 128

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 49%

7%
15%
29%
49%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,670, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 38%)
10%
18%
34%
38%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,731, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 58%)
3%
14%
25%
58%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,682, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 45%)
5%
22%
28%
45%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,815, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 75%)
25%
75%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,699, Tested: 86, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 47%)
6%
15%
32%
47%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,688, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,661
  • Males1,630
  • Females1,688
  • Hispanic1,617
  • Asian1,746
  • White1,667
  • Multirace1,605
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,661
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 127
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 128

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.1 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.7 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 45%

6%
22%
27%
45%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,630, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 37%)
5%
24%
34%
37%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,688, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 51%)
6%
22%
21%
51%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,617, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 32%)
9%
14%
45%
32%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,746, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 70%)
10%
20%
70%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,667, Tested: 88, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 47%)
5%
26%
22%
47%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
17%
33%
17%
33%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,973
  • Males3,929
  • Females4,010
  • Hispanic3,816
  • Asian4,159
  • White4,001
  • Multirace3,896
Science Average Scale Score:

3,973
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 126
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 127

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.1 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

12%
37%
33%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,929, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 10%)
9%
43%
38%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,010, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 25%)
15%
32%
28%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,816, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 5%)
18%
55%
22%
5%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,159, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 30%)
20%
50%
30%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,001, Tested: 87, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 21%)
11%
34%
34%
21%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,896, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
17%
50%
16%
17%

6th Grade
Math students tested: 4
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 4


Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 4


Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 24 (male: 11, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

39.7
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 1 (all male)
  • White: 1

Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 9 (male: 4, female: 5)
  • White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss SPICEWOOD, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents