Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Lakeway Elementary School in Austin, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 94
Address
 1701 LOHMANS CROSSING RD
Austin, TX 78734
Telephone
(512) 533-6350
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
94
Students
716
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
43.2
Free lunch eligible students
24
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
9
School district
LAKE TRAVIS ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
HUDSON BEND MIDDLE (3.6 miles):

99
LAKE TRAVIS MIDDLE (3.5 miles):

99
RIVER RIDGE EL (3.6 miles):

99
LAKE POINTE EL (4.5 miles):

98
BEE CAVE EL (3.1 miles):

97
SERENE HILLS EL (1.5 miles):

96
Lakeway Elementary School:

94
LAKE TRAVIS H S (1.8 miles):

90
LAKE TRAVIS EL (2.2 miles):

45
Lakeway Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Travis County:

57
Austin:

57
Lakeway Elementary School:

94

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 716
Enrollment in 2015: 701
Enrollment in 2014: 663
Enrollment in 2013: 648
Enrollment in 2012: 659
Enrollment in 2011: 652
Enrollment in 2010: 601
Enrollment in 2009: 570
Enrollment in 2008: 719
Enrollment in 2007: 726
Enrollment in 2006: 736
Enrollment in 2005: 873
Enrollment in 2004: 820
Enrollment in 2003: 628
Enrollment in 2002: 596
Enrollment in 2001: 587
Enrollment in 2000: 584
Enrollment in 1999: 676

Lakeway Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students297104116117132148716
Female students - 484650566174335
Male students2495866617174381
American Indian/Alaska Native students - 1 - 11115
Asian students - 9899121259
Hispanic students115101617112090
Black students - 14 - 1129
White students164788482100104513
Two or More Races students - 74677940

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 2
Kindergarten enrollment: 97
1st grade enrollment: 104
2nd grade enrollment: 116
3rd grade enrollment: 117
4th grade enrollment: 132
5th grade enrollment: 148

Lakeway Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 335 (46.8%)
School:

46.8%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 381 (53.2%)
Here:

53.2%
State:

50.1%

Lakeway Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 5 (0.7%)
School:

0.7%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 59 (8.2%)
Here:

8.2%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 90 (12.6%)
School:

12.6%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 9 (1.3%)
School:

1.3%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 513 (71.6%)
Lakeway Elementary School:

71.6%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 40 (5.6%)
School:

5.6%
Texas:

2.1%

Lakeway Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 33 (4.6%)
School:

4.6%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 24 (3.4%)
Lakeway Elementary School:

3.4%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 9 (1.3%)
School:

1.3%
State:

6.2%

Lakeway Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 43.2

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 5
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

16.6
State:

15.6

Lakeway Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $3,003,236
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 43 (Salary Expenditures: $2,272,182)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $306,552)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $258,105)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $166,398)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $70,060
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $731,054
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,272,182
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $306,552)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $258,105)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $166,397)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $70,060

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian10
  • White4
  • IDEA4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 27 (male: 15, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • Asian: 10 (male: 2, female: 8)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 64 (male: 47, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • White: 53 (male: 40, female: 13)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian4
  • Black2
  • White37
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 52 (male: 32, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 37 (male: 23, female: 14)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Here:

2.1%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
School:

1.9%
Texas:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Lakeway Elementary School:

1.7%
Texas:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
School:

1.7%
Texas:

4.1%

Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
School:

1.4%
Texas:

4.3%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian7
  • Black2
  • White55
  • Multirace10
  • LEP4
  • IDEA4
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 81 (male: 40, female: 41)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 55 (male: 26, female: 29)
  • Two or More Races: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

113.1
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,566
  • Males1,566
  • Females1,566
  • Hispanic1,532
  • Asian1,585
  • White1,566
  • Multirace1,602
Math Average Scale Score:

1,566
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 105
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 106

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.4 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.4 (85%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 46%

6%
25%
23%
46%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 48%)
7%
21%
24%
48%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 43%)
5%
31%
21%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,532, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 38%)
6%
44%
12%
38%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 55%)
9%
9%
27%
55%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 44%)
6%
26%
24%
44%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,602, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 60%)
40%
60%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,549
  • Males1,541
  • Females1,561
  • Hispanic1,515
  • Asian1,500
  • White1,557
  • Multirace1,622
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,549
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 105
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 106

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (93%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.2 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%

5%
29%
16%
50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,541, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 49%)
2%
32%
17%
49%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,561, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 52%)
9%
25%
14%
52%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,515, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 56%)
44%
56%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,500, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 45%)
45%
10%
45%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,557, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 49%)
7%
25%
19%
49%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 60%)
20%
20%
60%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,681
  • Males1,694
  • Females1,666
  • Hispanic1,601
  • Asian1,898
  • White1,684
  • Multirace1,676
Math Average Scale Score:

1,681
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 130
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 130

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.2 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 55%

8%
19%
18%
55%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,694, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 57%)
7%
17%
19%
57%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,666, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 52%)
8%
22%
18%
52%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 24%)
14%
34%
28%
24%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,898, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,684, Tested: 91, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 57%)
5%
19%
19%
57%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,676, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 67%)
11%
11%
11%
67%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,616
  • Males1,627
  • Females1,604
  • Hispanic1,593
  • Asian1,719
  • White1,617
  • Multirace1,589
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,616
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 130
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 130

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%

8%
21%
21%
50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 53%)
4%
25%
18%
53%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 47%)
13%
17%
23%
47%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 33%)
14%
29%
24%
33%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,719, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 75%)
25%
75%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,617, Tested: 91, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 52%)
7%
20%
21%
52%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 56%)
22%
11%
11%
56%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,301
  • Males4,297
  • Females4,306
  • Hispanic4,077
  • Asian4,853
  • White4,305
  • Multirace4,369
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,301
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 129
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 130

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.2 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 35%

10%
19%
36%
35%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,297, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 32%)
9%
16%
43%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,306, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 38%)
12%
21%
29%
38%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,077, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 14%)
10%
33%
43%
14%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,853, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 88%)
12%
88%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,305, Tested: 90, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 34%)
10%
17%
39%
34%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,369, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 44%)
22%
11%
23%
44%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,692
  • Males1,703
  • Females1,680
  • Hispanic1,629
  • Asian1,766
  • White1,701
  • Multirace1,710
Math Average Scale Score:

1,692
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 115
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 128

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 47%

6%
17%
30%
47%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,703, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 49%)
5%
14%
32%
49%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,680, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 45%)
7%
21%
27%
45%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,629, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 32%)
26%
16%
26%
32%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,766, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 71%)
14%
15%
71%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,701, Tested: 79, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 51%)
3%
15%
31%
51%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,710, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
43%
14%
43%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,674
  • Males1,669
  • Females1,679
  • Hispanic1,610
  • Asian1,694
  • White1,692
  • Multirace1,666
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,674
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 127
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 128

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.4 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.2 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%

5%
15%
30%
50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,669, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 47%)
3%
18%
32%
47%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,679, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 52%)
6%
14%
28%
52%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,610, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 26%)
16%
31%
27%
26%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,694, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 55%)
18%
27%
55%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,692, Tested: 84, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 56%)
2%
11%
31%
56%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,666, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 50%)
20%
30%
50%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,927
  • Males3,980
  • Females3,876
  • Hispanic3,630
  • Asian4,041
  • White3,980
  • Multirace3,995
Science Average Scale Score:

3,927
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 128
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 128

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.7 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

15%
39%
30%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,980, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 22%)
11%
45%
22%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,876, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 11%)
18%
34%
37%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,630, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 5%)
42%
32%
21%
5%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,041, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 27%)
9%
36%
28%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,980, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 18%)
8%
43%
31%
18%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,995, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 20%)
10%
40%
30%
20%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,863
  • Males1,898
  • Females1,833
  • White1,874
Math Average Scale Score:

1,863
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 13
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 13

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.6 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.5 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.5 (92%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6 (86%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 8%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 92%

8%
92%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,898, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 83%)
17%
83%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,833, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,874, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%

Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 13


Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White28
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
  • IDEA7
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 41 (male: 18, female: 23)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 28 (male: 14, female: 14)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Lakeway Elementary School:

57.3
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Lakeway Elementary School:

2.8
State:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Austin, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents