Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Red Lick Elementary School in Texarkana, TX
(KG-04 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 91
Address
 3511 N F M 2148
Texarkana, TX 75503
Telephone
(903) 838-8230
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.redlickisd.com
City-data.com school rating
91
Students
305
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
20.0
Free lunch eligible students
30
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
3
School district
RED LICK ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I targeted assistance school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
MARTHA & JOSH MORRISS MATH & ENGINEERING EL (3.6 miles):

100
RED LICK MIDDLE (0.0 miles):

96
Red Lick Elementary School:

91
PLEASANT GROVE INT (3.0 miles):

89
PLEASANT GROVE H S (3.7 miles):

81
HOOKS EL (4.9 miles):

79
NASH EL (2.9 miles):

68
WAKE VILLAGE EL (4.7 miles):

54
LEARY EL (2.0 miles):

45
Red Lick Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Bowie County:

58
Texarkana:

55
Red Lick Elementary School:

91

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 305
Enrollment in 2015: 326
Enrollment in 2014: 283
Enrollment in 2013: 289
Enrollment in 2012: 270
Enrollment in 2011: 269
Enrollment in 2010: 264
Enrollment in 2009: 264
Enrollment in 2008: 281
Enrollment in 2007: 293
Enrollment in 2006: 288
Enrollment in 2005: 278
Enrollment in 2004: 234
Enrollment in 2003: 228
Enrollment in 2002: 238
Enrollment in 2001: 237
Enrollment in 2000: 224
Enrollment in 1999: 237

Red Lick Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04Total
All students15666476273305
Female students - 3538242736160
Male students12128233537145
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - - - 11
Asian students - 1 - - - - 1
Hispanic students - 3342315
Black students - 1 - - 2 - 3
White students15162425766279
Two or More Races students - - 11136

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 1
Kindergarten enrollment: 56
1st grade enrollment: 66
2nd grade enrollment: 47
3rd grade enrollment: 62
4th grade enrollment: 73

Red Lick Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 160 (52.5%)
Red Lick Elementary School:

52.5%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 145 (47.5%)
School:

47.5%
State:

50.1%

Red Lick Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.3%)
Red Lick Elementary School:

0.3%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 1 (0.3%)
Red Lick Elementary School:

0.3%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 15 (4.9%)
Here:

4.9%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 3 (1.0%)
School:

1.0%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 279 (91.5%)
Here:

91.5%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 6 (2.0%)
School:

2.0%
Texas:

2.1%

Red Lick Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 33 (10.8%)
Red Lick Elementary School:

10.8%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 30 (9.8%)
School:

9.8%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 3 (1.0%)
School:

1.0%
State:

6.2%

Red Lick Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 20

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

15.3
State:

15.6

Red Lick Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $25
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 20 (Salary Expenditures: $900,430)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $32,179)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $51,951)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $69,387)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $284,234

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 20 (male: 13, female: 7)
  • White: 20 (male: 13, female: 7)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 21 (male: 10, female: 11)
  • White: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Red Lick Elementary School:

3.6%
Texas:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Red Lick Elementary School:

3.0%
Texas:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

4.3%
Texas:

4.8%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 22 (male: 8, female: 14)
  • White: 22 (male: 8, female: 14)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

72.1
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,635
  • Males1,612
  • Females1,655
  • White1,634
Math Average Scale Score:

1,635
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 72
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 72

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.3 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.7 (92%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 10%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 64%

10%
26%
64%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 61%)
15%
24%
61%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 67%)
5%
28%
67%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,634, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 65%)
9%
26%
65%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,572
  • Males1,547
  • Females1,593
  • White1,573
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,572
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 72
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 72

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (92%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.5 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.3 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 56%

1%
20%
23%
56%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 52%)
3%
21%
24%
52%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 59%)
18%
23%
59%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,573, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 56%)
1%
21%
22%
56%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,625
  • Males1,592
  • Females1,650
  • Hispanic1,596
  • White1,628
Math Average Scale Score:

1,625
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 46
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 46

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.2 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 13%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 37%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

9%
13%
37%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 40%)
20%
5%
35%
40%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,650, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 42%)
19%
39%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,596, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 44%)
10%
12%
34%
44%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,570
  • Males1,542
  • Females1,591
  • Hispanic1,587
  • White1,567
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,570
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 46
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 46

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.8 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 37%

11%
26%
26%
37%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,542, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 20%)
20%
30%
30%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 50%)
4%
23%
23%
50%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,587, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 40%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,567, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 37%)
12%
22%
29%
37%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,088
  • Males3,848
  • Females4,272
  • Hispanic3,997
  • White4,099
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,088
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 46
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 46

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.9 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.7 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

17%
26%
40%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,848, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 0%)
30%
25%
45%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,272, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 31%)
8%
27%
34%
31%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,997, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,099, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 20%)
20%
21%
39%
20%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for

This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 16
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • White: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)

Instances of corporal punishment (Students with disabilities): 3


Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Red Lick Elementary School:

6.6
State:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 5 (all male)
  • White: 5
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 4

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

13.1
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Red Lick Elementary School:

3.3
Texas:

27.5

Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Texarkana, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents