Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Ponder Elementary School in Ponder, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45
Address
 401 W BAILEY
Ponder, TX 76259
Telephone
(940) 479-8320
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.ponderisd.net
City-data.com school rating
45
Students
596
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
44.5
Free lunch eligible students
223
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
49
School district
PONDER ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
ARGYLE INT (7.4 miles):

97
PONDER J H (0.3 miles):

87
JUSTIN EL (7.1 miles):

82
NORTH TEXAS COLLEGIATE ACADEMY-NORTH CAMPUS (7.8 miles):

79
PONDER H S (0.2 miles):

74
KRUM H S (6.8 miles):

63
KRUM MIDDLE (6.6 miles):

60
BLANCHE DODD INT (6.7 miles):

48
Ponder Elementary School:

45
Ponder Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Denton County:

69
Ponder:

69
Ponder Elementary School:

45

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 596
Enrollment in 2015: 610
Enrollment in 2014: 565
Enrollment in 2013: 567
Enrollment in 2012: 578
Enrollment in 2011: 583
Enrollment in 2010: 602
Enrollment in 2009: 580
Enrollment in 2008: 546
Enrollment in 2007: 530
Enrollment in 2006: 492
Enrollment in 2005: 505
Enrollment in 2004: 459
Enrollment in 2003: 469
Enrollment in 2002: 428
Enrollment in 2001: 437
Enrollment in 2000: 433
Enrollment in 1999: 357

Ponder Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students409788958310588596
Female students18434453384845289
Male students22544442455743307
Asian students - - - - 1 - - 1
Hispanic students19262123172620152
Black students2 - 2311211
White students17686466647664419
Two or More Races students2313 - 2213

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 40
Kindergarten enrollment: 97
1st grade enrollment: 88
2nd grade enrollment: 95
3rd grade enrollment: 83
4th grade enrollment: 105
5th grade enrollment: 88

Ponder Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 289 (48.5%)
School:

48.5%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 307 (51.5%)
School:

51.5%
Texas:

50.1%

Ponder Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Asian enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Ponder Elementary School:

0.2%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 152 (25.5%)
School:

25.5%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 11 (1.8%)
Here:

1.8%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 419 (70.3%)
School:

70.3%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 13 (2.2%)
School:

2.2%
Texas:

2.1%

Ponder Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 272 (45.6%)
Ponder Elementary School:

45.6%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 223 (37.4%)
School:

37.4%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 49 (8.2%)
Ponder Elementary School:

8.2%
State:

6.2%

Ponder Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 44.5

Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 45
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

13.4
State:

15.6

Ponder Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,829,479
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 49 (Salary Expenditures: $2,372,615)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $157,254)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $151,780)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $147,830)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $80,855
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $456,864
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,431,415
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $157,254)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $151,780)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $147,830)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $80,855

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 57 (male: 28, female: 29)
  • Hispanic: 55 (male: 26, female: 29)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 46 (male: 32, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
  • White: 32 (male: 22, female: 10)


Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Ponder Elementary School:

9.3%
Texas:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Ponder Elementary School:

2.3%
State:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Ponder Elementary School:

2.1%
Texas:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Ponder Elementary School:

2.3%
State:

4.3%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 32 (male: 16, female: 16)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

53.7
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,515
  • Males1,528
  • Females1,503
  • Hispanic1,463
  • White1,534
Math Average Scale Score:

1,515
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 114
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 114

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.4 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.9 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

13%
30%
25%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 36%)
13%
24%
28%
36%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,503, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 30%)
14%
35%
21%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,463, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 21%)
24%
31%
24%
21%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 77, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 38%)
10%
29%
23%
38%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,464
  • Males1,441
  • Females1,487
  • Hispanic1,397
  • White1,491
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,464
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 114
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 115

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.9 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.7 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

18%
34%
21%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,441, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 21%)
19%
39%
21%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,487, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 33%)
16%
30%
21%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,397, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 51%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 10%)
28%
51%
11%
10%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,491, Tested: 77, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 35%)
14%
28%
23%
35%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,563
  • Males1,568
  • Females1,558
  • Hispanic1,540
  • Black1,447
  • White1,591
  • Multirace1,521
Math Average Scale Score:

1,563
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 113
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 114

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

23%
35%
17%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 29%)
26%
34%
11%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,558, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 20%)
20%
36%
24%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 21%)
34%
35%
10%
21%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,447, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
57%
29%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 31%)
13%
37%
19%
31%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,521, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
33%
34%
33%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,515
  • Males1,518
  • Females1,513
  • Hispanic1,462
  • Black1,457
  • White1,553
  • Multirace1,456
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,515
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 113
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 114

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

21%
31%
31%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,518, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 19%)
17%
33%
31%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,513, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 15%)
25%
30%
30%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,462, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 14%)
45%
17%
24%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,457, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 71%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
29%
71%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,553, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 21%)
10%
30%
39%
21%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,456, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 66%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
17%
66%
17%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,503
  • Males3,507
  • Females3,498
  • Hispanic3,255
  • Black3,352
  • White3,619
  • Multirace3,620
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,503
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 115
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 115

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.7 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%

55%
27%
15%
3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,507, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 3%)
56%
25%
16%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,498, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 4%)
54%
28%
14%
4%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,255, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 76%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 0%)
76%
14%
10%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,352, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 86%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
86%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,619, Tested: 72, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 4%)
43%
35%
18%
4%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,620, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 17%)
50%
33%
17%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,598
  • Males1,606
  • Females1,589
  • Hispanic1,570
  • White1,615
Math Average Scale Score:

1,598
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 105
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.2 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.3 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

19%
40%
21%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 21%)
14%
47%
18%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 18%)
24%
33%
25%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,570, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 17%)
27%
43%
13%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 21%)
12%
41%
26%
21%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,560
  • Males1,557
  • Females1,562
  • Hispanic1,532
  • White1,574
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,560
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 104
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

29%
24%
23%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,557, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 20%)
29%
29%
22%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,562, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 29%)
29%
18%
24%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,532, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 27%)
33%
27%
13%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,574, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 25%)
26%
23%
26%
25%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,808
  • Males3,880
  • Females3,724
  • Hispanic3,652
  • White3,871
Science Average Scale Score:

3,808
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 104
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 105

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.9 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 52%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

18%
52%
18%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,880, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 18%)
16%
45%
21%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,724, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 4%)
21%
60%
15%
4%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,652, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 3%)
24%
55%
18%
3%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,871, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 14%)
15%
52%
19%
14%

5th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Science students tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 41 (male: 25, female: 16)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • White: 31 (male: 20, female: 11)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Ponder Elementary School:

68.8
State:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

3.4
Texas:

7.2


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 20 (male: 16, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 16 (male: 14, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 5 (all male)
  • White: 5

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Ponder, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents