Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Pewitt Elementary School in Omaha, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 49
Address
 374 COUNTY RD 4318
Omaha, TX 75571
Telephone
(903) 884-2404
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://pewittcisd.net
City-data.com school rating
49
Students
488
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
33.0
Free lunch eligible students
304
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
53
School district
PEWITT CISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CHAPEL HILL EL (11.0 miles):

86
PEWITT H S (0.6 miles):

66
CHAPEL HILL H S (11.0 miles):

61
SOUTH EL (11.1 miles):

60
CHAPEL HILL J H (11.0 miles):

60
Pewitt Elementary School:

49
DAINGERFIELD J H (9.8 miles):

30
PEWITT J H (0.6 miles):

26
DAINGERFIELD H S (11.3 miles):

20
Pewitt Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Morris County:

42
Omaha:

47
Pewitt Elementary School:

49

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 488
Enrollment in 2015: 504
Enrollment in 2014: 524
Enrollment in 2013: 557
Enrollment in 2012: 528
Enrollment in 2011: 511
Enrollment in 2010: 490
Enrollment in 2009: 461
Enrollment in 2008: 474
Enrollment in 2007: 466
Enrollment in 2006: 444
Enrollment in 2005: 435
Enrollment in 2004: 375
Enrollment in 2003: 398
Enrollment in 2002: 425
Enrollment in 2001: 444
Enrollment in 2000: 453
Enrollment in 1999: 452

Pewitt Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students60716483727167488
Female students32303340313522223
Male students28413143413645265
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - 1 - - - - 1
Asian students - 1 - - 1 - - 2
Hispanic students881013911564
Black students9710101591474
White students38513756464948325
Two or More Races students546412 - 22

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 60
Kindergarten enrollment: 71
1st grade enrollment: 64
2nd grade enrollment: 83
3rd grade enrollment: 72
4th grade enrollment: 71
5th grade enrollment: 67

Pewitt Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 223 (45.7%)
School:

45.7%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 265 (54.3%)
School:

54.3%
Texas:

50.1%

Pewitt Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Pewitt Elementary School:

0.2%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Pewitt Elementary School:

0.4%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 64 (13.1%)
Pewitt Elementary School:

13.1%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 74 (15.2%)
Here:

15.2%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 325 (66.6%)
School:

66.6%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 22 (4.5%)
Pewitt Elementary School:

4.5%
State:

2.1%

Pewitt Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 357 (73.2%)
Pewitt Elementary School:

73.2%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 304 (62.3%)
Pewitt Elementary School:

62.3%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 53 (10.9%)
School:

10.9%
State:

6.2%

Pewitt Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 33

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 0.3

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

14.8
State:

15.6

Pewitt Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,064,386
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 27.9 (Salary Expenditures: $1,706,327)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $200,330
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $0
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,412,881
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $0

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 36 (male: 14, female: 22)
  • Hispanic: 34 (male: 14, female: 20)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic8
  • Black7
  • White47
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 62 (male: 42, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Black: 7 (all male)
  • White: 47 (male: 31, female: 16)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

5.6%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 4 (all female)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Pewitt Elementary School:

6.3%
State:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

4.8%
Texas:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Pewitt Elementary School:

2.8%
State:

4.1%

Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Pewitt Elementary School:

2.8%
Texas:

3.6%

    Total number of students retained in 5th grade

  • Black2
  • White4
  • IDEA2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Here:

9.0%
Texas:

4.3%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

14.3
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,457
  • Males1,477
  • Females1,437
  • Hispanic1,462
  • Black1,379
  • White1,466
  • Multirace1,514
Math Average Scale Score:

1,457
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 63
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 63

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.4 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

21%
36%
29%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 16%)
10%
42%
32%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,437, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
31%
31%
25%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,462, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 71%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
71%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,379, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
45%
37%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,466, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 22%)
22%
28%
28%
22%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,514, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
50%
37%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,427
  • Males1,430
  • Females1,425
  • Hispanic1,410
  • Black1,364
  • White1,441
  • Multirace1,469
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,427
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 63
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 63

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.6 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

21%
42%
21%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,430, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 13%)
26%
39%
22%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,425, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 19%)
16%
46%
19%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,410, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
29%
42%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,364, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 9%)
36%
55%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,441, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 22%)
17%
39%
22%
22%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,469, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
13%
38%
37%
13%

3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,475
  • Males1,447
  • Females1,503
  • Hispanic1,492
  • Black1,416
  • White1,485
Math Average Scale Score:

1,475
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 74
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 74

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.1 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2 (50%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

57%
25%
10%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,447, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 66%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 3%, Masters: 5%)
66%
26%
3%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,503, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 11%)
47%
25%
17%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 8%)
42%
33%
17%
8%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,416, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 75%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 0%)
75%
17%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,485, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 9%)
55%
28%
8%
9%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,470
  • Males1,435
  • Females1,507
  • Hispanic1,478
  • Black1,405
  • White1,483
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,470
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 74
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 74

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

47%
27%
12%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,435, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 3%)
58%
29%
10%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,507, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 25%)
36%
25%
14%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,478, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 17%)
42%
41%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,405, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 83%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 0%)
83%
9%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,483, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 15%)
38%
30%
17%
15%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,463
  • Males3,297
  • Females3,638
  • Hispanic3,712
  • Black3,254
  • White3,451
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,463
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 74
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 74

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.1 (39%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.4 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 61%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

61%
20%
15%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,297, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 74%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 3%)
74%
18%
5%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,638, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 6%)
47%
22%
25%
6%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,712, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 0%)
33%
25%
42%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,254, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 83%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 0%)
83%
9%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,451, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 62%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 4%)
62%
23%
11%
4%

4th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Writing students tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,613
  • Males1,613
  • Females1,612
  • Hispanic1,599
  • Black1,572
  • White1,622
Math Average Scale Score:

1,613
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 62
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 62

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.3 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

13%
32%
39%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 19%)
9%
38%
34%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 13%)
17%
26%
44%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 80%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
80%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 9%)
18%
46%
27%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 20%)
14%
25%
41%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,548
  • Males1,528
  • Females1,569
  • Hispanic1,578
  • Black1,544
  • White1,544
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,548
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 62
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 62

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

24%
36%
25%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 9%)
31%
38%
22%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 20%)
17%
33%
30%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
60%
20%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 9%)
36%
28%
27%
9%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 16%)
25%
34%
25%
16%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,824
  • Males3,821
  • Females3,826
  • Hispanic3,700
  • Black3,714
  • White3,873
Science Average Scale Score:

3,824
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 61
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 61

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.2 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

20%
42%
27%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,821, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 13%)
22%
44%
21%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,826, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 10%)
17%
42%
31%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,700, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,714, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 64%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
18%
64%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,873, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 14%)
21%
32%
33%
14%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for

This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (All preschool students): 2
Preschool students who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
Instances of corporal punishment (IDEA preschool students): 1

Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 32

    Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment

  • Hispanic4
  • Black5
  • White16
  • Multirace4
  • LEP4
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 29 (male: 23, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 5 (all male)
  • White: 16 (male: 14, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Instances of corporal punishment (Students with disabilities): 6
Students with disabilities who received corporal punishment: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)


Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

4.1
Texas:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Black2
  • White3
  • IDEA2
  • 5041
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 5 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 3
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
  • Section 504: 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 6

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Pewitt Elementary School:

12.3
Texas:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 9 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • White: 5

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 3

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
School:

6.1
State:

27.5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
Pewitt Elementary School:

2.0
State:

12.0
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Omaha, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents