Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Chapel Hill Elementary School in Mount Pleasant, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 86
Address
 1069 CR 4660
Mount Pleasant, TX 75455
Telephone
(903) 572-1086
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://chisddevils.com
City-data.com school rating
86
Students
468
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
33.0
Free lunch eligible students
215
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
31
School district
CHAPEL HILL ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Chapel Hill Elementary School:

86
CHAPEL HILL H S (0.0 miles):

61
CHAPEL HILL J H (0.0 miles):

60
HARTS BLUFF EL (7.6 miles):

59
ANNIE SIMS EL (4.6 miles):

54
FRANCES CORPREW EL (5.9 miles):

52
VIVIAN FOWLER EL (6.3 miles):

49
E C BRICE EL (4.9 miles):

48
P E WALLACE MIDDLE (4.8 miles):

25
Chapel Hill Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Titus County:

47
Mount Pleasant:

50
Chapel Hill Elementary School:

86

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 468
Enrollment in 2015: 460
Enrollment in 2014: 471
Enrollment in 2013: 467
Enrollment in 2012: 457
Enrollment in 2011: 402
Enrollment in 2010: 381
Enrollment in 2009: 376
Enrollment in 2008: 414
Enrollment in 2007: 412
Enrollment in 2006: 428
Enrollment in 2005: 433
Enrollment in 2004: 412
Enrollment in 2003: 420
Enrollment in 2002: 429
Enrollment in 2001: 388
Enrollment in 2000: 359
Enrollment in 1999: 379

Chapel Hill Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students32587383748464468
Female students18333239334827230
Male students14254144413637238
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - 1 - - 1 - 2
Asian students - - 2 - 11 - 4
Hispanic students12162526243222157
Black students152 - 54219
White students18364156404640277
Two or More Races students11214 - - 9

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 32
Kindergarten enrollment: 58
1st grade enrollment: 73
2nd grade enrollment: 83
3rd grade enrollment: 74
4th grade enrollment: 84
5th grade enrollment: 64

Chapel Hill Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 230 (49.1%)
Here:

49.1%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 238 (50.9%)
School:

50.9%
State:

50.1%

Chapel Hill Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
Here:

0.4%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 4 (0.9%)
Chapel Hill Elementary School:

0.9%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 157 (33.5%)
School:

33.5%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 19 (4.1%)
Chapel Hill Elementary School:

4.1%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 277 (59.2%)
Here:

59.2%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 9 (1.9%)
Here:

1.9%
State:

2.1%

Chapel Hill Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 246 (52.6%)
Chapel Hill Elementary School:

52.6%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 215 (45.9%)
Here:

45.9%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 31 (6.6%)
School:

6.6%
Texas:

6.2%

Chapel Hill Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 33

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 25
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 9
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

14.2
Texas:

15.6

Chapel Hill Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,657,735
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 25 (Salary Expenditures: $1,337,932)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 9 (Salary Expenditures: $159,398)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $96,405)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $64,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $124,582
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,794,989
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,383,275
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $203,977)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $143,736)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $64,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $199,684

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic94
  • Asian4
  • White2
  • IDEA10
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 100 (male: 54, female: 46)
  • Hispanic: 94 (male: 50, female: 44)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 43 (male: 35, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
  • White: 29 (male: 25, female: 4)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 14 (male: 10, female: 4)


Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Chapel Hill Elementary School:

6.9%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Here:

8.2%
Texas:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

2.4%
State:

4.8%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Chapel Hill Elementary School:

29.9
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,471
  • Males1,461
  • Females1,481
  • Hispanic1,404
  • White1,512
Math Average Scale Score:

1,471
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 74
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 74

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.1 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 49%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

12%
49%
23%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,461, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 11%)
9%
57%
23%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,481, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 21%)
15%
41%
23%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,404, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 0%)
31%
45%
24%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,512, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 51%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 26%)
51%
23%
26%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,515
  • Males1,477
  • Females1,550
  • Hispanic1,453
  • White1,551
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,515
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 74
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 74

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.5 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.6 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

8%
28%
28%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 23%)
9%
42%
26%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 49%)
8%
15%
28%
49%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,453, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 21%)
17%
35%
27%
21%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 46%)
3%
25%
26%
46%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,536
  • Males1,532
  • Females1,540
  • Hispanic1,494
  • White1,562
Math Average Scale Score:

1,536
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 80
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 81

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

21%
39%
27%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,532, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 12%)
23%
40%
25%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
19%
38%
29%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,494, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 4%)
37%
33%
26%
4%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,562, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 18%)
12%
41%
29%
18%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,585
  • Males1,580
  • Females1,592
  • Hispanic1,506
  • White1,629
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,585
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 80
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 80

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.2 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

16%
18%
30%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,580, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 28%)
16%
19%
37%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 46%)
16%
16%
22%
46%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,506, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 19%)
27%
27%
27%
19%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,629, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 46%)
10%
13%
31%
46%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,799
  • Males3,695
  • Females3,922
  • Hispanic3,642
  • White3,891
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,799
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 79
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 80

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.9 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

32%
27%
36%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,695, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 2%)
35%
32%
31%
2%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,922, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 8%)
28%
22%
42%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,642, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 0%)
38%
39%
23%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,891, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 8%)
27%
24%
41%
8%

4th Grade (Spanish)

Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


Writing students tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,699
  • Males1,686
  • Females1,715
  • Hispanic1,723
  • Black1,601
  • White1,693
Math Average Scale Score:

1,699
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 82
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.5 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%

1%
14%
35%
50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,686, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 43%)
2%
20%
35%
43%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,715, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 58%)
6%
36%
58%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,723, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 67%)
7%
26%
67%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,693, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 47%)
2%
11%
40%
47%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,605
  • Males1,586
  • Females1,630
  • Hispanic1,587
  • Black1,494
  • White1,633
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,605
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 82
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.4 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.1 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

9%
28%
33%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 24%)
11%
32%
33%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,630, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 39%)
6%
22%
33%
39%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,587, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 22%)
11%
33%
34%
22%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,494, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 80%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
20%
80%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,633, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 40%)
4%
20%
36%
40%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,112
  • Males4,036
  • Females4,209
  • Hispanic4,018
  • Black4,140
  • White4,178
Science Average Scale Score:

4,112
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 82
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 82

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.2 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.3 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 42%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

7%
27%
42%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,036, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 17%)
7%
34%
42%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,209, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 33%)
8%
17%
42%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,018, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 19%)
7%
34%
40%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,140, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
20%
20%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,178, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 29%)
4%
27%
40%
29%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for

This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (All preschool students): 2
Preschool students who received corporal punishment: 4 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Two or More Races: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
Instances of corporal punishment (IDEA preschool students): 1

Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 3
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Instances of corporal punishment (Students with disabilities): 1
Students with disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all female)
  • Two or More Races: 2


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 1 (all male)
  • White: 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

2.1
Texas:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic7
  • White7
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 16 (male: 10, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • White2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Mount Pleasant, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents