Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Kress Elementary School in Kress, TX
(PK-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 19
Address
 200 E 5TH
Kress, TX 79052
Telephone
(806) 684-2326
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
19
Students
153
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
10.5
Free lunch eligible students
112
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
6
School district
KRESS ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
ESTACADO MIDDLE (11.2 miles):

54
PLAINVIEW H S (11.7 miles):

54
THUNDERBIRD EL (10.6 miles):

52
KRESS H S (0.0 miles):

42
CORONADO MIDDLE (11.1 miles):

41
EDGEMERE EL (11.3 miles):

41
HIGHLAND EL (12.1 miles):

33
TULIA J H (12.2 miles):

30
Kress Elementary School:

19
Kress Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Swisher County:

45
Kress:

31
Kress Elementary School:

19

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 153
Enrollment in 2015: 140
Enrollment in 2014: 130
Enrollment in 2013: 153
Enrollment in 2012: 139
Enrollment in 2011: 122
Enrollment in 2010: 119
Enrollment in 2009: 104
Enrollment in 2008: 118
Enrollment in 2007: 106
Enrollment in 2006: 127
Enrollment in 2005: 139
Enrollment in 2004: 123
Enrollment in 2003: 143
Enrollment in 2002: 157
Enrollment in 2001: 159
Enrollment in 2000: 148
Enrollment in 1999: 144

Kress Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06Total
All students1722162119142519153
Female students512910669562
Male students1210711138161491
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - 1 - - - - 1
Hispanic students12141114106111189
Black students2111222112
White students37457512649
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - - 1 - 12

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 17
Kindergarten enrollment: 22
1st grade enrollment: 16
2nd grade enrollment: 21
3rd grade enrollment: 19
4th grade enrollment: 14
5th grade enrollment: 25
6th grade enrollment: 19

Kress Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 62 (40.5%)
Kress Elementary School:

40.5%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 91 (59.5%)
School:

59.5%
State:

50.1%

Kress Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.7%)
Here:

0.7%
Texas:

0.4%
Hispanic enrollment: 89 (58.2%)
Here:

58.2%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 12 (7.8%)
Here:

7.8%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 49 (32.0%)
School:

32.0%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 2 (1.3%)
Kress Elementary School:

1.3%
Texas:

0.1%

Kress Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 118 (77.1%)
Here:

77.1%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 112 (73.2%)
School:

73.2%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 6 (3.9%)
Here:

3.9%
Texas:

6.2%

Kress Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 10.5

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 3.5
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 7
Number of FTE school counselors: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

14.6
Texas:

15.6

Kress Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $864,837
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 11 (Salary Expenditures: $864,837)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $94,093)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $309,624)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $209,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $612,716
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $612,716
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $864,837
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $94,093)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $309,624)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $209,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $0

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 5 (all female)
  • Black: 5
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 5

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Kress Elementary School:

9.1%
Texas:

5.2%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

26.1
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,391
  • Males1,363
  • Females1,420
  • Hispanic1,368
  • White1,472
Math Average Scale Score:

1,391
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 20
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 20

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.2 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

35%
40%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,363, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 0%)
60%
10%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,420, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 70%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
10%
70%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,368, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 0%)
46%
46%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,472, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 0%)
33%
67%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,386
  • Males1,367
  • Females1,405
  • Hispanic1,379
  • White1,431
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,386
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 20
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 20

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

35%
40%
15%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,367, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 10%)
40%
40%
10%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,405, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 10%)
30%
40%
20%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,379, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 8%)
38%
39%
15%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,431, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
17%
50%
16%
17%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,498
  • Males1,497
  • Females1,499
  • Hispanic1,474
  • White1,595
Math Average Scale Score:

1,498
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 27
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.3 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.1 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2 (50%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

48%
33%
12%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,497, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 0%)
43%
36%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,499, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 15%)
54%
31%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,474, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
50%
37%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,595, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 25%)
25%
37%
13%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,457
  • Males1,441
  • Females1,474
  • Hispanic1,462
  • White1,503
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,457
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 27
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.4 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

48%
30%
18%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,441, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
43%
43%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,474, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 8%)
54%
15%
23%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,462, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
44%
31%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,503, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 13%)
38%
38%
12%
13%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,497
  • Males3,527
  • Females3,465
  • Hispanic3,475
  • White3,723
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,497
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 27
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.3 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.7 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

59%
19%
18%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,527, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 0%)
57%
22%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,465, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 62%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 8%)
62%
15%
15%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,475, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 0%)
56%
25%
19%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,723, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
50%
12%
25%
13%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,606
  • Males1,581
  • Females1,628
  • Hispanic1,594
  • White1,641
Math Average Scale Score:

1,606
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 25
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 25

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.2 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

16%
36%
28%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,581, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 14%)
21%
43%
22%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
10%
30%
40%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,641, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 25%)
37%
38%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,554
  • Males1,541
  • Females1,568
  • Hispanic1,538
  • White1,586
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,554
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 25
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 25

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

20%
28%
36%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,541, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
21%
36%
29%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
20%
20%
40%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 13%)
27%
26%
34%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 25%)
13%
25%
38%
25%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,686
  • Males3,734
  • Females3,614
  • Hispanic3,517
  • White3,924
Science Average Scale Score:

3,686
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 25
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 25

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.2 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.7 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.1 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

32%
36%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,734, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
33%
34%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,614, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 0%)
30%
40%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,517, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 0%)
50%
43%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,924, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 0%)
11%
22%
67%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,609
  • Males1,594
  • Females1,627
  • Hispanic1,602
  • White1,618
Math Average Scale Score:

1,609
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 24
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.7 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.7 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.9 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

29%
42%
25%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 8%)
38%
39%
15%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 0%)
18%
46%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,602, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 59%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 8%)
33%
59%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
25%
25%
50%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,550
  • Males1,506
  • Females1,601
  • Hispanic1,566
  • White1,537
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,550
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 24
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.1 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

33%
42%
21%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,506, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 0%)
46%
39%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 9%)
18%
46%
27%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 8%)
33%
25%
34%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,537, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
38%
50%
13%

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
School:

13.1
State:

30.4

Corporal Punishment:
Show data for
This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 11 (male: 9, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 5 (all male)

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,090 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic10
  • Black4
  • White7
  • LEP4
  • IDEA4
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 21 (male: 9, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

137.3
State:

159.6

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic10
  • American Indian2
  • Native Hawaiian2
  • Black4
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 18 (male: 14, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Kress, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Kress main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Kress Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents