Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School in Austin, TX
(KG-04 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 43
Address
 8509 FM 969 BLDG 629
Austin, TX 78724
Telephone
(512) 501-3643
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.kippaustin.org
City-data.com school rating
43
Students
601
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
34.5
Free lunch eligible students
440
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
68
School district
KIPP AUSTIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
JORDAN EL (1.8 miles):

74
KIPP AUSTIN COLLEGE PREP (0.3 miles):

60
KIPP AUSTIN ACADEMY OF ARTS & LETTERS (0.0 miles):

58
KIPP AUSTIN COMUNIDAD (0.0 miles):

57
AUSTIN DISCOVERY SCH (0.5 miles):

49
KIPP AUSTIN COLLEGIATE (0.3 miles):

45
Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School:

43
OVERTON EL (1.7 miles):

33
OAK MEADOWS EL (0.3 miles):

29
Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Travis County:

57
Austin:

57
This School:

43

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 601
Enrollment in 2015: 482
Enrollment in 2014: 372
Enrollment in 2013: 260
Enrollment in 2012: 132

Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeKGG01G02G03G04Total
All students131125121116108601
Female students6958516448290
Male students6267705260311
Asian students - - 1 - - 1
Hispanic students11910510910397533
Black students5141013951
White students74 - - 213
Two or More Races students - 21 - - 3

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 131
1st grade enrollment: 125
2nd grade enrollment: 121
3rd grade enrollment: 116
4th grade enrollment: 108

Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 290 (48.3%)
School:

48.3%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 311 (51.7%)
Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School:

51.7%
State:

50.1%

Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Here:

0.2%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 533 (88.7%)
School:

88.7%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 51 (8.5%)
Here:

8.5%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 13 (2.2%)
Here:

2.2%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 3 (0.5%)
School:

0.5%
Texas:

2.1%

Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 508 (84.5%)
Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School:

84.5%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 440 (73.2%)
School:

73.2%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 68 (11.3%)
School:

11.3%
Texas:

6.2%

Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 34.5

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 4

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

17.4
State:

15.6

Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,000,801
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 29 (Salary Expenditures: $1,451,847)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $228,120)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.3 (Salary Expenditures: $84,193)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $236,641)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,516,607
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $659,881
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,500,408
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $228,120)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.8 (Salary Expenditures: $104,120)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $327,641)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $1,595,931

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic406
  • Black2
  • White4
  • IDEA34
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 412 (male: 220, female: 192)
  • Hispanic: 406 (male: 218, female: 188)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 34 (male: 26, female: 8)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 55 (male: 38, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 47 (male: 34, female: 13)
  • Black: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 38 (male: 28, female: 10)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,613 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School:

1.5%
State:

5.3%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,487
  • Males1,483
  • Females1,492
  • Hispanic1,488
  • Black1,433
Math Average Scale Score:

1,487
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 115
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 115

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

23%
26%
27%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,483, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 23%)
23%
21%
33%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 26%)
22%
32%
20%
26%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,488, Tested: 100, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 24%)
21%
27%
28%
24%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,433, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 17%)
42%
16%
25%
17%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,394
  • Males1,400
  • Females1,388
  • Hispanic1,387
  • Black1,400
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,394
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 87
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 87

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

41%
29%
12%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,400, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 22%)
38%
31%
9%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,388, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
45%
26%
15%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,387, Tested: 72, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 15%)
43%
28%
14%
15%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,400, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 25%)
33%
42%
25%
3rd Grade (Spanish)

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,435
  • Males1,417
  • Females1,460
  • Hispanic1,435
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,435
Texas:

956
Reading students tested: 28
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 28

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.6 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

18%
25%
28%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,417, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 19%)
19%
25%
37%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,460, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 42%)
17%
25%
16%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,435, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
18%
25%
28%
29%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,559
  • Males1,551
  • Females1,569
  • Hispanic1,561
  • Black1,520
Math Average Scale Score:

1,559
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 109
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 109

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.2 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.2 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

23%
29%
27%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 20%)
25%
30%
25%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 22%)
20%
29%
29%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,561, Tested: 101, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 22%)
23%
28%
27%
22%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,520, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
29%
42%
15%
14%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,478
  • Males1,451
  • Females1,511
  • Hispanic1,478
  • Black1,442
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,478
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 108
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 108

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.6 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

44%
21%
18%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,451, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 14%)
53%
16%
17%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,511, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 20%)
33%
26%
21%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,478, Tested: 100, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 16%)
42%
22%
20%
16%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,442, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 14%)
71%
15%
14%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,660
  • Males3,529
  • Females3,817
  • Hispanic3,669
  • Black3,409
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,660
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 108
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 108

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

42%
25%
24%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,529, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 7%)
53%
23%
17%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,817, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 12%)
29%
26%
33%
12%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,669, Tested: 100, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 10%)
40%
26%
24%
10%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,409, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
71%
15%
14%
4th Grade (Spanish)
Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Writing students tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Health & Safety


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived race, color or national origin. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin constitutes racial harassment.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of religion refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived religion. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of religion constitutes religious harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 2
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin per 1,000 students
School:

3.3
State:

1.3
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sexual orientation: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sexual orientation per 1,000 students
Here:

1.7
Texas:

0.8


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic28
  • Black7
  • White2
  • LEP19
  • IDEA2
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 37 (male: 19, female: 18)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
  • Black: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

61.6
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

1.7
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Austin, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Austin main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Kipp Austin Connections Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents