Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Grandview Elementary School in Grandview, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 84
Address
 301 ZEBRA PKWY
Grandview, TX 76050
Telephone
(817) 866-4600
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://gvisd.org
City-data.com school rating
84
Students
492
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
31.9
Free lunch eligible students
179
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
31
School district
GRANDVIEW ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Grandview Elementary School:

84
GRANDVIEW J H (0.4 miles):

74
GRANDVIEW H S (0.4 miles):

66
COVINGTON SCHOOL (6.8 miles):

56
ITASCA EL (6.8 miles):

48
ITASCA H S (6.8 miles):

45
ALVARADO H S (9.2 miles):

43
ITASCA MIDDLE (6.8 miles):

26
ALVARADO INT (9.8 miles):

16
Grandview Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Johnson County:

55
Grandview:

75
Grandview Elementary School:

84

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 492
Enrollment in 2015: 482
Enrollment in 2014: 482
Enrollment in 2013: 482
Enrollment in 2012: 234
Enrollment in 2011: 238
Enrollment in 2010: 248
Enrollment in 2009: 243
Enrollment in 2008: 238
Enrollment in 2007: 248
Enrollment in 2006: 246
Enrollment in 2005: 252
Enrollment in 2004: 246
Enrollment in 2003: 234

Grandview Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students33748673598087492
Female students17353829342943225
Male students16394844255144267
American Indian/Alaska Native students111 - 2 - 16
Asian students1 - - 1 - 2 - 4
Hispanic students111314188161595
Black students - - - 11125
White students19597051486068375
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - 2 - - - 2
Two or More Races students111 - - 115

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 33
Kindergarten enrollment: 74
1st grade enrollment: 86
2nd grade enrollment: 73
3rd grade enrollment: 59
4th grade enrollment: 80
5th grade enrollment: 87

Grandview Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 225 (45.7%)
Grandview Elementary School:

45.7%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 267 (54.3%)
Here:

54.3%
State:

50.1%

Grandview Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 6 (1.2%)
School:

1.2%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 4 (0.8%)
Grandview Elementary School:

0.8%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 95 (19.3%)
School:

19.3%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 5 (1.0%)
Grandview Elementary School:

1.0%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 375 (76.2%)
School:

76.2%
State:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 2 (0.4%)
School:

0.4%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 5 (1.0%)
Here:

1.0%
State:

2.1%

Grandview Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 210 (42.7%)
Here:

42.7%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 179 (36.4%)
School:

36.4%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 31 (6.3%)
Here:

6.3%
Texas:

6.2%

Grandview Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 31.9

Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 1
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 0.3
Number of FTE nurses: 0.3

Student/Teacher Ratio
Grandview Elementary School:

15.4
Texas:

15.6

Grandview Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,098,356
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 34 (Salary Expenditures: $1,681,562)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 8 (Salary Expenditures: $169,672)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.3 (Salary Expenditures: $82,982)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $108,717)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $116,498
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $410,886
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,744,863
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 9.8 (Salary Expenditures: $219,187)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.3 (Salary Expenditures: $82,982)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $108,717)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $116,993

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 40 (male: 20, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 40 (male: 20, female: 20)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5 (all male)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 39 (male: 29, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 13 (all male)
  • White: 26 (male: 16, female: 10)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (all male)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic4
  • Black4
  • White22
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 32 (male: 20, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

2.7%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Here:

2.3%
State:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
School:

3.4%
Texas:

4.1%

Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all female)
  • Two or More Races: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
School:

2.3%
State:

4.3%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic2
  • White13
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 17 (male: 8, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

34.6
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,544
  • Males1,556
  • Females1,528
  • Hispanic1,489
  • White1,559
Math Average Scale Score:

1,544
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 85
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 85

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 47%

14%
19%
20%
47%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 52%)
13%
21%
15%
52%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 41%)
16%
16%
27%
41%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 31%)
23%
15%
31%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 48%)
12%
20%
20%
48%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,499
  • Males1,496
  • Females1,504
  • Hispanic1,453
  • White1,510
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,499
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 85
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 85

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

8%
32%
24%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 31%)
6%
36%
27%
31%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,504, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 43%)
11%
27%
19%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,453, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 23%)
23%
15%
39%
23%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 39%)
5%
34%
22%
39%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,693
  • Males1,676
  • Females1,715
  • Hispanic1,618
  • White1,715
Math Average Scale Score:

1,693
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 86
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 86

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.1 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.5 (86%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 13%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 62%

2%
13%
23%
62%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,676, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 63%)
4%
12%
21%
63%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,715, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 59%)
14%
27%
59%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 35%)
4%
31%
30%
35%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,715, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 69%)
2%
6%
23%
69%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,590
  • Males1,591
  • Females1,589
  • Hispanic1,524
  • White1,609
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,590
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 86
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 86

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.4 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

6%
28%
25%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 43%)
8%
21%
28%
43%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 38%)
3%
38%
21%
38%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,524, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 17%)
17%
40%
26%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,609, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 47%)
2%
25%
26%
47%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,911
  • Males3,897
  • Females3,930
  • Hispanic3,618
  • White4,016
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,911
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 86
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 86

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.2 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

28%
27%
29%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,897, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 12%)
27%
26%
35%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,930, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 22%)
30%
27%
21%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,618, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 0%)
52%
18%
30%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,016, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 22%)
20%
29%
29%
22%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,718
  • Males1,706
  • Females1,725
  • Hispanic1,676
  • White1,729
Math Average Scale Score:

1,718
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 79
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 79

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.9 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 8%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 49%

5%
8%
38%
49%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,706, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 47%)
3%
4%
46%
47%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,725, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 51%)
6%
10%
33%
51%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,676, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 33%)
8%
9%
50%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,729, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 53%)
3%
7%
37%
53%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,607
  • Males1,596
  • Females1,613
  • Hispanic1,543
  • White1,619
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,607
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 79
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 79

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.1 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

8%
36%
23%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,596, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 30%)
10%
33%
27%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 35%)
6%
39%
20%
35%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,543, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 58%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 8%)
17%
58%
17%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 37%)
6%
31%
26%
37%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,046
  • Males4,203
  • Females3,950
  • Hispanic3,845
  • White4,103
Science Average Scale Score:

4,046
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 79
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 79

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.6 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.1 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

8%
41%
31%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,203, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 33%)
7%
23%
37%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,950, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 12%)
8%
53%
27%
12%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,845, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 8%)
25%
42%
25%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,103, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 25%)
3%
41%
31%
25%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for

This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 11
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 12 (male: 10, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

Instances of corporal punishment (Students with disabilities): 6
Students with disabilities who received corporal punishment: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic4
  • Black2
  • White19
  • LEP2
  • IDEA7
  • 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 25 (male: 15, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Grandview Elementary School:

50.8
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 5 (all male)
  • White: 5

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • White4
  • 5044
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Grandview, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents