Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Fairmont Elementary School in Pasadena, TX
(KG-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 95
Address
 4315 HEATHFIELD
Pasadena, TX 77505
Telephone
(832) 668-8500
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
95
Students
802
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
47.4
Free lunch eligible students
135
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
23
School district
DEER PARK ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Fairmont Elementary School:

95
FAIRMONT J H (0.6 miles):

92
CARPENTER ELEMENTARY (2.4 miles):

85
TURNER EL (1.7 miles):

73
BONDY INT (1.6 miles):

72
JP DABBS ELEMENTARY (1.9 miles):

68
BONNETTE J H (2.5 miles):

65
VISTA ACADEMY OF PASADENA (0.6 miles):

62
GOLDEN ACRES EL (2.2 miles):

12
Fairmont Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Harris County:

51
Pasadena:

42
Fairmont Elementary School:

95

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 802
Enrollment in 2015: 809
Enrollment in 2014: 831
Enrollment in 2013: 814
Enrollment in 2012: 814
Enrollment in 2011: 804
Enrollment in 2010: 769
Enrollment in 2009: 796
Enrollment in 2008: 790
Enrollment in 2007: 768
Enrollment in 2006: 808
Enrollment in 2005: 789
Enrollment in 2004: 811
Enrollment in 2003: 758
Enrollment in 2002: 748
Enrollment in 2001: 770
Enrollment in 2000: 811
Enrollment in 1999: 846

Fairmont Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students117142121141130151802
Female students566569615867376
Male students617752807284426
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - - 1 - 1
Asian students32425319
Hispanic students454951544962310
Black students24464727
White students658260786778430
Two or More Races students25214115

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 117
1st grade enrollment: 142
2nd grade enrollment: 121
3rd grade enrollment: 141
4th grade enrollment: 130
5th grade enrollment: 151

Fairmont Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 376 (46.9%)
Fairmont Elementary School:

46.9%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 426 (53.1%)
Here:

53.1%
State:

50.1%

Fairmont Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Here:

0.1%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 19 (2.4%)
School:

2.4%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 310 (38.7%)
School:

38.7%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 27 (3.4%)
Here:

3.4%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 430 (53.6%)
Fairmont Elementary School:

53.6%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 15 (1.9%)
School:

1.9%
State:

2.1%

Fairmont Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 158 (19.7%)
Fairmont Elementary School:

19.7%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 135 (16.8%)
School:

16.8%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 23 (2.9%)
Here:

2.9%
State:

6.2%

Fairmont Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 47.4

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 4
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

16.9
Texas:

15.6

Fairmont Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $3,118,442
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 47.4 (Salary Expenditures: $2,613,420)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3.9 (Salary Expenditures: $70,574)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $629,650)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $161,087)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $186,798
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,513,365
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,784,632
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 8.8 (Salary Expenditures: $164,379)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6.1 (Salary Expenditures: $818,980)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $161,087)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $186,798

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic22
  • Asian7
  • White4
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 35 (male: 23, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 43 (male: 29, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 20 (male: 13, female: 7)
  • White: 23 (male: 16, female: 7)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic16
  • Black4
  • White34
  • Multirace2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 56 (male: 35, female: 21)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 34 (male: 23, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Here:

1.4%
Texas:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

1.7%
Texas:

4.8%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic16
  • Asian4
  • White52
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 74 (male: 44, female: 30)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 52 (male: 29, female: 23)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

92.3
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,480
  • Males1,481
  • Females1,478
  • Hispanic1,473
  • Black1,385
  • White1,500
Math Average Scale Score:

1,480
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 162
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 163

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.2 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

19%
35%
23%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,481, Tested: 91, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 24%)
19%
36%
21%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,478, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 21%)
18%
36%
25%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,473, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 17%)
22%
36%
25%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,385, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 8%)
42%
25%
25%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,500, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 30%)
14%
34%
22%
30%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,463
  • Males1,450
  • Females1,480
  • Hispanic1,466
  • Black1,371
  • White1,472
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,463
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 163
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 163

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

18%
38%
18%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,450, Tested: 92, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 24%)
24%
40%
12%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,480, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 30%)
10%
36%
24%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,466, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 31%)
18%
36%
15%
31%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,371, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 8%)
33%
42%
17%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,472, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 25%)
12%
44%
19%
25%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,660
  • Males1,669
  • Females1,652
  • Hispanic1,662
  • Black1,443
  • White1,672
  • Multirace1,677
Math Average Scale Score:

1,660
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 143
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 143

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.7 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%

5%
24%
21%
50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,669, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 49%)
6%
19%
26%
49%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,652, Tested: 75, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 51%)
4%
28%
17%
51%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,662, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 54%)
2%
30%
14%
54%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,443, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
50%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,672, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 48%)
4%
15%
33%
48%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,677, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 50%)
50%
50%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,574
  • Males1,567
  • Females1,580
  • Hispanic1,573
  • Black1,437
  • White1,586
  • Multirace1,554
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,574
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 142
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 143

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.8 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

11%
25%
33%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,567, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 30%)
12%
27%
31%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,580, Tested: 75, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 32%)
11%
22%
35%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,573, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 29%)
14%
27%
30%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,437, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
50%
17%
16%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 33%)
6%
24%
37%
33%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
20%
20%
40%
20%

Writing students tested: 2
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 2


5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,641
  • Males1,643
  • Females1,638
  • Hispanic1,637
  • Black1,634
  • White1,647
Math Average Scale Score:

1,641
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 117
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 160

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.7 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

6%
30%
40%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 23%)
5%
26%
46%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 25%)
8%
34%
33%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,637, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 29%)
10%
27%
34%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,634, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
57%
29%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,647, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 48%, Masters: 21%)
3%
28%
48%
21%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,622
  • Males1,633
  • Females1,607
  • Hispanic1,620
  • Black1,560
  • White1,628
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,622
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 158
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 160

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.6 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

8%
27%
35%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,633, Tested: 90, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 28%)
3%
27%
42%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 34%)
15%
26%
25%
34%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 69, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 30%)
12%
27%
31%
30%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
14%
57%
15%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 80, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 31%)
5%
24%
40%
31%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,179
  • Males4,249
  • Females4,087
  • Hispanic4,139
  • Black3,883
  • White4,229
Science Average Scale Score:

4,179
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 159
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 159

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.7 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.9 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.5 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

7%
27%
33%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,249, Tested: 91, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 36%)
3%
21%
40%
36%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,087, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 29%)
12%
35%
24%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,139, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 30%)
9%
31%
30%
30%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,883, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 0%)
14%
43%
43%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,229, Tested: 80, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 39%)
5%
22%
34%
39%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,890
  • Males1,904
  • Females1,865
  • Hispanic1,887
  • White1,887
Math Average Scale Score:

1,890
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 42
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.8 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.6 (91%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.3 (90%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 83%

17%
83%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,904, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 89%)
11%
89%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,865, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 73%)
27%
73%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,887, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 89%)
11%
89%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,887, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 77%)
23%
77%

Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 42


Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White19
  • IDEA4
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 33 (male: 20, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Fairmont Elementary School:

41.1
State:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

5.0
State:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Pasadena, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents